-
35 votes
-
Seattle’s law mandating higher pay for food delivery workers is a case study in backfire economics
18 votes -
Europe's new power map, from ASML to the Arctic – places other than Paris, Brussels and Berlin are wielding economic influence
4 votes -
Donald Trump hush money trial: What criminal charges does he face?
16 votes -
For proponents of "vote for the lesser of two evils", what is your endgame?
If I understand folks with that PoV correctly: if you are a democrat or typically vote democrat, you generally think that republicans are a danger to democracy, bad for the lives of minorities,...
If I understand folks with that PoV correctly:
if you are a democrat or typically vote democrat, you generally think that republicans are a danger to democracy, bad for the lives of minorities, and the disadvantaged/LGBT+, etc.
If you are a republican or typically vote republican, you generally think that democrats are a danger to democracy, divide the country with identity politics, etc.
(obviously I am making sweeping generalizations of both camps off the top of my head but hopefully the point comes across)But, I don't get what your endgame is. Like, you make it seem like if the other party wins, the country is screwed. but you can't possibly think that the country will forever vote for your party for President, right? So you think America is destined to go downhill depending on how many years the opposing party is in power?
America flips between red and blue. So the other party is bound to win at least once a decade imo. and yet I hear how democracy is more at stake now than it's ever been if "the other party wins". So I don't get the long-term viability of "lesser of 2 evils" approach.
Since I doubt America will become less angry and divisive anytime soon thanks to yallls 24 hour news networks and the social media companies that make more money the more Americans are mad at each other.
Then again, I am by no means an expert so where am I wrong or have I misunderstood something?
13 votes -
US survey shows abortion bans drive away young talent
52 votes -
German court says far-right AfD is suspected of extremism
23 votes -
Are most political talks performative?
This is a thought I had, and I'm not saying it's necessarily true, or at least cynically true. But I think it brings to the fore an interesting point, and I want to emphasize how it feels like. I...
This is a thought I had, and I'm not saying it's necessarily true, or at least cynically true. But I think it brings to the fore an interesting point, and I want to emphasize how it feels like.
I feel like people are mostly interested in politics from a distant and uninvolved point of view. For example, in more progressive spaces, there's all this talk about fear of climate change, deteriorating international politics, rise of right wing authoritarianism, populism, nationalism, etc. However, I feel like people expect others to do something about it. There's this passivity and inaction, and no real effort to combat such changes. I feel like debates, talking, ruminating and such perform a theatrical function that makes you feel as if you've contributed to "doing good", but you actually don't do anything. This is what I mean by performative.
This is not to say talking is unimportant. It's a major component of politics, and it's a core value and function of democratic and egalitarian approaches. However, it feels to me like doomscrolling and dreading or being angry about political things is seen as being politically conscious and active, while political consciousness can't exist without action.
What are your thoughts about this? Have you had similar thoughts, or do you think differently? How do you emotionally handle this?
24 votes -
I'm curious how people on here stay politically engaged and aware while maintaining mental health?
the Israel-Palestine war has not been good to my mental health and the coverage and the treatment of the campus protests oddly is what did me in. Now one approach could be to just not watch the...
the Israel-Palestine war has not been good to my mental health and the coverage and the treatment of the campus protests oddly is what did me in.
Now one approach could be to just not watch the coverage but I have come around to the point of view that not watching meaning not knowing what's happening and you need to know what is happening if only for the hope to be more informed about the politics of the government you live in.
So I guess I am trying to understand what is a responsible way to digest news about something that enrages you? Or is there no such thing? Cause I don't do social media (aside from occasional reddit and just the frontpage when I do that once in a while) and I refuse to watch any 24/7 news networks. I only do an hour of CBC and like 1-3 daily news podcasts which each do like 10-20 min daily updates.
Cause the Israel-Palestine war doubled with the terrible way the campus protests are being treated has really shaken my faith and trust in institutions and I won't go into how cause I don't want to invite infighting on tildes and potential Islamophobia and antisemitism after what happened in that macklemore thread.
27 votes -
Patriarchy according to the Barbie movie
9 votes -
Fascism and the failure of imagination
8 votes -
It’s the first time crypto has become an issue in the general election of a US Presidential race
3 votes -
The aggressive Arizona grand jury that indicted Donald Trump's allies
6 votes -
The five futures of Russia
27 votes -
Undocumented workers played a larger and more dangerous role in delivering the Olympic Games than the Emmanuel Macron administration acknowledges
7 votes -
Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of May 6
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate...
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.
This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.
9 votes -
California junk fee ban could upend restaurant industry
39 votes -
The Day Iceland Stood Still | Trailer
8 votes -
Sweden has a global reputation for championing high taxes and social equality, but it has become a European hotspot for the super rich
19 votes -
As China and Iran hunt for dissidents in the US, the FBI is racing to counter the threat
20 votes -
MIT scraps diversity statements in faculty-hiring process
14 votes -
The existence of a Roma police register is shocking but not surprising. It is directly linked to Norway's long history of antigypsyism.
16 votes -
Florida is the first state to ban lab grown meat - Ron DeSantis
37 votes -
7,000 Maui short-term rentals could be eliminated under new county bill
20 votes -
Spending cuts are often false economies that end up costing society dearly
16 votes -
Georgia rocked by protests as government pushes Vladimir Putin-style ‘foreign agent’ bill
27 votes -
George Monbiot comes face to face with his local conspiracy theorist
12 votes -
Arizona governor Katie Hobbs signs abortion ban repeal bill
49 votes -
Denmark to liberalize its abortion law to allow the procedure until eighteenth week of pregnancy
22 votes -
Britain's Foreign Secretary David Cameron, in Kyiv, promises Ukraine aid for 'as long as it takes'
18 votes -
Former US President Donald Trump will speak at the Libertarian National Convention
28 votes -
New EPA regulation requires coal plants in the United States to reduce 90 percent of their greenhouse pollution by 2039
33 votes -
Canada bet big on immigration. Now it’s hitting the brakes.
31 votes -
Colorado lawmakers approve broad, nation-leading Right to Repair law
22 votes -
US Supreme Court leaves in place a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify users' ages
33 votes -
Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of April 29
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate...
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.
This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.
3 votes -
Opinion: The many US campaign finance violations divulged in Donald Trump’s hush-money criminal trial
25 votes -
Ferrying voting machines to mountains and tropical areas in Indian elections is a Herculean task
13 votes -
How (and why) the right stole Christianity
22 votes -
US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana in a historic shift, AP sources say
75 votes -
UK becomes first country to outlaw easily guessable default passwords on connected devices
37 votes -
US House Democratic leaders say they would help save Speaker Mike Johnson's job
16 votes -
How do you accidentally run for President of Iceland?
30 votes -
It’s hard being black in France, says Omar Sy after Aya Nakamura racism row
19 votes -
Iraq criminalises same-sex relationships in new law
8 votes -
Ireland plans to send asylum seekers back to UK under emergency law
14 votes -
British Columbia to recriminalize use of drugs in public spaces
35 votes -
US government reportedly ponders crimping China's use of RISC-V
20 votes -
New American military aid for Ukraine - What's in the package and what impact will it have?
13 votes -
Book ban fight in Nevada would create LGBTQ section of libraries
9 votes