-
2 votes
-
Digital Lithium
I'd like to preface this with saying I'm not a super big fan of the internet. While it's a great tool and places like Tildes exist, I'd posit that a vast majority of the internet is less utility...
I'd like to preface this with saying I'm not a super big fan of the internet. While it's a great tool and places like Tildes exist, I'd posit that a vast majority of the internet is less utility and more waste of mental space for most people. How much information does the typical web page for different types of content offer? How much do we intend to absorb? How much do we actually absorb? Most people say it is a decreasing trend, the web page offers (in ELI5 fashion) three informations, we try to absorb two, we generally only get one.
I believe it's different now-a-days. The web page offers two, we intend to absorb one, but we end up with three informations. Modern internet journalism preys on our emotions, social media preys on our emotions. The authors of major internet outlets sensationalize everything. So we end up with:
- The information we are interested in.
- The superfluous information, often irrelevant, through content like advertisements, "related topics/articles/pages" and other people's comments (not always made in good faith or constructive).
- Our emotional reaction. This is something that while engineered by the content creators, only exists in our minds.
Like any good book, we pick up the content and when we put it down we walk away with more to think about than what was originally written. Except, what do we do when this concept is detrimental to societal development and our own health?
Then we think about the speed of information. What prompted this entire post for me was an article I was reading on CNN today, about the execution of Daniel Lewis Lee. This is not a man I have any sympathy for, I do not like him or any ideas he represented. A man convicted of killing three people and a self-proclaimed white supremacist was executed this morning.
This morning.
I got into town this morning and read the article, it had been posted 10 minutes prior.
10 minutes.
Mr. Lee was pronounced dead at 8:07AM ET. I read this article at about 6:30AM MT. Within 30 or so minutes of a man being killed for what the state claims is his crime, I was informed by an internet article. I am about 2000 miles away from where this man was killed.
30 minutes.
I have been off the internet for quite some time, so I'm getting back into the groove a little bit. This hit me like a truck, had this occurred 3 months ago I don't think I would have flinched. What kind of world do we live in, where a ubiquitous monstrosity called the internet can so easily desensitize us to the fact that a human being was just killed by the state for their crimes?
I offer no sympathies for the man or his actions, I do not wish this to be a post about the death penalty but that is still a human being that was just killed. I argue not whether or not he should have been executed, I instead posit that our reactions as a society are a testament to how much empathy and humanity has been lost in the modern age. In the grand scheme of things, for everybody but the most intimately familiar and impacted people, this is just a headline. It will be forgotten in a few days, life will go on. I believe this is a direct consequence of the aforementioned information overload in association with emotionally driven content.
Is this the world we created? Is this how we want to live? In this society where the loss of one is equal to the loss of none? Even the loss of a distant many is inconsequential in the modern, desensitized age. I believe we as a people are numbed by our own creations, and I honestly don't know what we can do about it.
9 votes -
Friction, snake oil, and weird countries: Cybersecurity systems could deepen global inequality through regional blocking
5 votes -
Bad faith is the condition of the modern internet, and shitposting is the lingua franca of the online world
35 votes -
Only 9% of visitors give GDPR consent to be tracked
8 votes -
Google is messing with the address bar again—new experiment hides URL path
16 votes -
Terrible, dangerous EARN IT act set to move forward in the senate; attack on both encryption and free speech online
27 votes -
How the USA’s massive failure to close the digital divide got exposed by the coronavirus
5 votes -
Oracle's BlueKai tracks you across the web. That data spilled online.
5 votes -
Andrew Yang is pushing Big Tech to pay users for data
18 votes -
Inside the underground trade of pirated OnlyFans porn
9 votes -
US Department of Justice’s review of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and proposals for reform
5 votes -
What's wrong with email?
14 votes -
An army of volunteers is taking on vaccine disinformation online
6 votes -
Don't ask to ask, just ask
21 votes -
Facebook and Google refuse to pay revenue to Australian media
10 votes -
Cynicism is a tired trope
Cynicism is the bastard cousin of skepticism. While optimists look for the silver lining, cynics can't fail to see the fly in the ointment and true skeptics are somewhere in the middle. Cynicism...
Cynicism is the bastard cousin of skepticism. While optimists look for the silver lining, cynics can't fail to see
the fly in the ointment and true skeptics are somewhere in the middle. Cynicism is an overwhelming trend in internet forums. The most upvoted reactions are usually the more pessimistic (regardless of factuality), and seemingly virtuous attitudes are immediately met with assumptions of bad faith.Cynicism is tiresome and can very well lead to false conclusions.
This may be unlikely, but paradigms can be improved, governments can adopt better policies, corporations can act for the good of society, billionaires can be virtuous philanthropists, assholes can learn to be nice, and bigots can learn to respect diversity. We should be absolutely skeptical of sudden changes of attitude, but indiscriminate cynicism creates an environment that does not reward positive changes, and I don't think that's in the best interest of a community.
EDIT: I feel I need to clarify that cynicism is not equal to skepticism. Skeptics refrain from conviction in face of insufficient evidence, while cynics assume bad faith even without sufficient evidence. I am not advocating for naïveté, but for healthy skepticism.
40 votes -
Search only forums and find actually useful information with BoardReader
15 votes -
Thirteen virtual festivals and events this summer
5 votes -
CDA Section 230 explained: The important and often-misunderstood legal foundation of the social internet
6 votes -
Scuba divers could send sea life shots in real time using an aquatic internet service
3 votes -
Covid-19 makes it clearer than ever: access to the internet should be a universal right -- Tim Berners-Lee
14 votes -
Privacy browser Brave under fire for violating users’ trust
23 votes -
Why email is the best discussion platform
10 votes -
What if the internet never existed?
5 votes -
Incognito mode detection still works in Chrome despite promise to fix
11 votes -
Critics warn of multimedia 'hell' (1995)
9 votes -
Internet service provider Optus has been ordered to hand over the details of a customer accused of defaming a Melbourne dentist through a Google review
7 votes -
How a raccoon became an aardvark
7 votes -
Watch SpaceX launch Starlink Mission 8 [Livestream, launch at 9:25PM ET June 3, 1:25 UTC June 4]
8 votes -
DuckDuckGo now crawls the web regularly to create a free list of trackers to block
21 votes -
Can we save the night sky from satellite streaks? Legal comment launches as constellation companies scramble to satisfy astronomers' concerns
5 votes -
Min: a minimalist web browser
20 votes -
speed.cloudflare.com
16 votes -
The co-op that blocked the sale of the .org domain to private equity has a plan to democratise large parts of the internet
13 votes -
Skyrim grandma is taking a break because of internet assholes
18 votes -
Researchers claim new internet speed record of 44.2 Tbps over a standard optical fiber cable, using a single integrated chip
9 votes -
Copyright bots and classical musicians are fighting online. The bots are winning
15 votes -
The coronavirus is making us all camgirls: For millions of newly remote workers, doing your job now involves looking the part, figuring out your angles, and performing for the camera
7 votes -
Victory! ICANN rejects .ORG sale to private equity firm Ethos Capital
22 votes -
What does it mean to be a ‘Karen’? Karens explain: As the meme has become more prominent online, its meaning has become confused – with real-life Karens caught in the crosshairs
13 votes -
The confessions of Marcus "MalwareTech" Hutchins, the hacker who stopped WannaCry and was arrested by the FBI in 2017
33 votes -
Anatomy of an internet shutdown
7 votes -
A high-level overview of the background of the ".org" top-level domain and what happened with its recent attempted sale to a private equity firm
12 votes -
Cringe
27 votes -
Welcome to the age of privacy nihilism
13 votes -
World of Warcraft's game director Ion Hazzikostas on how the game's culture has evolved with the internet
6 votes -
What are your internet time sinks?
Where do you all waste away most of your time on the internet? I hate to sound like a hipster, but I've come to avoid and/or dislike most main stream content aggregators. Reddit, Twitter,...
Where do you all waste away most of your time on the internet? I hate to sound like a hipster, but I've come to avoid and/or dislike most main stream content aggregators. Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, etc. are all platforms I no longer participate in because of privacy and quality reasons. I like Tildes and all, but the community is small (and I like it this way) and that means the content isn't always fresh. So where else do you all hang out?
31 votes -
Hey, what's that?
11 votes -
The story of Dimrain47
5 votes