-
4 votes
-
How a grocery store's plan to shame customers into using reusable bags backfired
14 votes -
Six Finnish cities are building a model for sustainable urban development
6 votes -
9 top subreddits for tech sustainability enthusiasts
2 votes -
How to make wind power sustainable again
6 votes -
Jane Jacobs and the death and life of American planning
6 votes -
How the Green New Deal can deliver land justice
4 votes -
For a healthier planet, eat these fifty foods, campaign urges
9 votes -
Kipple field notes
3 votes -
Solar farms shine a ray of hope on bees and butterflies
5 votes -
UK ban on discarding edible fish at sea thwarted by industry
4 votes -
How to responsibly get rid of the stuff you’ve decluttered
6 votes -
What cities are getting wrong about public transportation
7 votes -
The status of vertical farming at the end of 2018 - a summary
13 votes -
Food in the Anthropocene
The study published in the Lancet: Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems The editorial in the Lancet: The 21st-century great food...
The study published in the Lancet: Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
The editorial in the Lancet: The 21st-century great food transformation
An article in Cosmos for people (like me!) who don't have access to the Lancet: Feeding the planet: a call for radical action
7 votes -
World's coffee under threat, say experts
8 votes -
Steven Pinker’s ideas are fatally flawed
14 votes -
Stop buying crap, and companies will stop making crap
30 votes -
Global food systems are failing humanity and speeding up climate change: New report from 130 national academies issues wake-up call
8 votes -
You can’t talk about right-wing populism without talking about urban planning
12 votes -
How to build a low-tech website
20 votes -
Roaches taste like blue cheese, and other bugsgiving revelations [Warning: graphic bug images]
9 votes -
Mondelez cuts ties with twelve palm oil suppliers, citing deforestation
14 votes -
If human population stops rising or decreases, what will be the negative effects for people?
From the environmental standpoint shrinking of human population is often quoted to have desirable effects, and that's reasonable. But from the point of view of our daily lives and functioning of...
From the environmental standpoint shrinking of human population is often quoted to have desirable effects, and that's reasonable. But from the point of view of our daily lives and functioning of the human society, what negatives could we then expect? (I mean a soft decline due to lower birth rates, not some abrupt events.)
For example, with smaller population fewer music albums could be made every year than some time before, and people would maybe feel less inspired and satisfied. Less scientific research, less choices for relationships... and maybe other things? Would being more technically advanced compensate for the issues? Won't we feel ourselves in oblivion and romanticize the "numerous" past?
15 votes -
Dan Barber: 'Twenty years from now you’ll be eating fast food crickets'
6 votes -
Seychelles issues world’s first blue bond to fund fisheries projects
3 votes -
How to build a low-tech website
31 votes -
Why growth can’t be green
16 votes -
Imagining Post-Capitalism - Kim Stanley Robinson, 2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csvroehk7Ww
6 votes -
Spinning sail technology is poised to bring back wind-powered ships
6 votes -
The world's first floating farm making waves in Rotterdam
4 votes -
Does eating sustainable caught food help or hurt this?
5 votes -
Frasers Receive Green Light for Green Mall in Australian Retail First
3 votes -
The entire economy is MoviePass now. Enjoy it while you can.
6 votes