16
votes
If you had to teach a class on literature, what books would you put on your syllabus?
I asked a similar question over in ~games and am interested to hear how ~books would respond to the same setup.
Here's the task: pretend you're a professor! You have to do the following:
- Choose a focus for your class on literature (with a snazzy title if you like)
- Choose the books that you, as a professor, will have your class dive into in order to convey key concepts
- Explain why each book you chose ties into your overarching exploration
Your class can have any focus, broad or specific: victorian literature, contemporary poetry, Shakespearean themes in non-Shakespearean works -- whatever you want! It can focus on any forms of literature and does not have to be explicitly limited to "books" if you want to look at some outside-of-the-box stuff (I once took a literature class where we read afternoon, a story, for example.)
After choosing your specific focus, choose what will be included on your syllabus as "required reading" and why you've chosen each item.
For those interested in this topic, I'd also have to recommend Mary Pipher's nonfiction Women Rowing North, as much for the potential of examining its flaws during a classroom session, as for its virtues in exploring the challenges of aging for women. [The self-help and positive thinking book genres are worth literary analysis and exploration in their own rights, I suspect.]
I hate to bring up the old staple, Death of A Salesman, in this context, but it does grasp the nettle of mortality and the smallness and intimacy of an individual's life.
Welcome to 'Exposition in Economical Evolutionary Possibilities' (EEEP), my name is Professor Drannex, here will be your course reading list.
Fiction:
Non-fiction:
The books are varied, but they all have a central thesis on the possibilities of economic change, importance and the societal regards they require. This was a fun list to make and think about.
Dang, I loved Cod by Kurlansky. I feel like he did a shallow dive on how fishers acquired salt in that book and how key it was to their success, I'll definitely be checking out Salt: A History.
I love your take on this topic, and the books you've chosen sound really interesting (I've added several to my reading list)! I like that you're blending fiction and non-fiction as well. Very cool. Thanks for taking the time to put together this "class" for us!
What I would like to do if I were an actual teacher is find books that kids are already popular with my pupils, read through a few of them, and see if I could adapt them to my requirements. I'm something of an anti-classicalist; if I'm going to teach students, I want it to be obvious that this is useful today. That and I think that from an academic standpoint a lot of literature lessons are built around things students generally are not interested in.
The YA meta-genre which is popular right now is surprisingly rich, and one thing I really like about modern literature is that it seems that minorities are being given more chances to take the spotlight. Books like The Hate U Give are great examples of literature that also give excellent life lessons.
Honestly, I wouldn't want to limit my class to be limited to studying books; bringing games and movies or even TV series would be a really great way to expand students' minds. Imagine the kinds of conversations you could have after playing something like To The Moon, or watching Season 1 of The OA. I'm having fun imaging what would happen after I assigned Mulholland Drive.
I do have one "Cheat" book I would like to cover as well. I call it a cheat because I fell in love with it after being assigned from a literature class. Bread Givers by Anzia Yezierska is a relatively modern classic. The informal language makes it really easy for modern readers to understand, and there are so many fine layers you can examine. It's a story you can enjoy at face value, but once you start reading between the lines you find out that it has so much more to give you.
Don Quixote would be my #1 pick (but to be read last).
Then, in order:
Mason & Dixon by Thomas Pynchon.
Death Comes for the Archbishop by Willa Cather.
Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov.
100 Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez.
Pilgrim at Tinker Creek, Holy the Firm, and For the Time Being by Annie Dillard (as a trilogy).
An Elemental Thing by Eliot Weinberger.
The Periodic Table by Primo Levi.
Libra by Don DeLillo.
some collection of Borges.
The Recognitions by William Gaddis and 2666 by Roberto Bolaño (one required, one for extra credit).
and at least Franny and Zooey by J.D. Salinger (as an epilogue).
I think that's a good start. Contemporary(ish) American literature, mostly. Don Quixote is essential for understanding it all. But you'll understand why once you read it after all these other books. The three books in between the horizontal rules are a bit unrelated, in that sense, but provide a good non-fiction break. And they're beautiful books (Dillard, in particular).
Gods yes, this is a fantastic list. I'll confess that when I had to take a college English Literature class, the instructor thought that the relentlessly cheerful (/s) classics Jude the Obscure, Northanger Abbey, and Bartleby, the Scrivener would somewhat enrich our grasping little minds. To the best of my knowledge, there were no student suicides that semester, but it was a near thing.
That'd be a hell of a long semester! You could easily teach a course on just Pale Fire (and some supporting texts), or Don Quixote, or The Recognitions.
Ha, true! I guess it could be spread out over the course of a year, with the middle selection of books being an intercession, or somethin. Devotees of the study of literature would make quick work of that stuff, I'd imagine.
I’d grab some long reputable list mixing several genres and periods and tell them to choose.
My teacher did that on high school and it was great. I read Young Werther, The Process (Kafka) and Crime and Punishment.