On the other hand, it doesn't do any sort of CSS styling either, when many web sites rely on CSS to turn HTML that starts with sidebars and menu links into something people can read and use.
On the other hand, it doesn't do any sort of CSS styling either, when many web sites rely on CSS to turn HTML that starts with sidebars and menu links into something people can read and use.
True, but it's always been my opinion that a website that doesn't work in lynx doesn't work at all. It isn't necessarily a reasonable opinion, but I'm an old man.
True, but it's always been my opinion that a website that doesn't work in lynx doesn't work at all. It isn't necessarily a reasonable opinion, but I'm an old man.
We're very amused by this at Mozilla. My favourite comment about it was this:
Good job, but I have to admit that I like Lynx precisely because it doesn't do CancerScript.
On the other hand, it doesn't do any sort of CSS styling either, when many web sites rely on CSS to turn HTML that starts with sidebars and menu links into something people can read and use.
True, but it's always been my opinion that a website that doesn't work in lynx doesn't work at all. It isn't necessarily a reasonable opinion, but I'm an old man.
You could combine this with noscript.
I could, or I could stick with lynx. :)
I've written JS for a paycheck, too. Not proud of it, but I was too old and fat to do more honest work, like gay-for-pay.
I agree with you, though I prefer w3m to lynx these days. Might be something to check out if you feel like shaking things up.