There's a sketchy link in the article to the study it cites, and uMatrix blocks it for me: the link, with the sketchiness removed, is this draft PDF in a google drive folder. At first glance, the...
There's a sketchy link in the article to the study it cites, and uMatrix blocks it for me: the link, with the sketchiness removed, is this draft PDF in a google drive folder.
At first glance, the decline being touted here seems minimal (126 MMTCO2e projected in 2020 vs a peak of 133 in 2010, a 5% decrease), and the projected emissions of 123 MMTCO2e in 2030 seem embarrassing and completely inadequate.
Am I reading this incorrectly? This doesn't seem to be good news at all.
Climate causing? Well we can't have that. Don't want clouds of climate floating around willy-nilly. Seriously though, good work Colorado. It's almost like passing legislation to force businesses...
Climate causing? Well we can't have that. Don't want clouds of climate floating around willy-nilly.
Seriously though, good work Colorado. It's almost like passing legislation to force businesses to operate more cleanly works better than just letting them "self-regulate" and hoping they'll do the right thing.
There's a sketchy link in the article to the study it cites, and uMatrix blocks it for me: the link, with the sketchiness removed, is this draft PDF in a google drive folder.
At first glance, the decline being touted here seems minimal (126 MMTCO2e projected in 2020 vs a peak of 133 in 2010, a 5% decrease), and the projected emissions of 123 MMTCO2e in 2030 seem embarrassing and completely inadequate.
Am I reading this incorrectly? This doesn't seem to be good news at all.
Climate causing? Well we can't have that. Don't want clouds of climate floating around willy-nilly.
Seriously though, good work Colorado. It's almost like passing legislation to force businesses to operate more cleanly works better than just letting them "self-regulate" and hoping they'll do the right thing.