-
6 votes
-
A rare “Polar Express” winter pattern is forecast over the United States and Canada, following a Polar Vortex split
36 votes -
National Data Buoy Center - BuoyCAMs
7 votes -
The secretive cabal of US polluters that is rewriting the EU’s human rights and climate law
9 votes -
Volcanic eruption may have triggered Europe's deadly Black Death plague
8 votes -
Collapse of critical Atlantic current is no longer low-likelihood, study finds
44 votes -
Tweaks to state laws mean many Americans will be able to benefit from small, simple plug-in solar panels
32 votes -
Iran's president says capital must move from Tehran over ecological concerns
39 votes -
Letter to a Liberal member of Parliament
Dear Mr. Sawatzky, Both atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) and temperature are increasing at an exponential rate, in lock-step. Atmospheric CO₂ levels during the Eocene have been estimated up to 840...
Dear Mr. Sawatzky,
Both atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) and temperature are increasing at an exponential rate, in lock-step. Atmospheric CO₂ levels during the Eocene have been estimated up to 840 parts per million (ppm); sea levels were close to 60 metres higher than today. CO₂ concentrations are over 425 ppm and still climbing. Pause a moment to consider what this will mean for all coastal cities.
What part of “keep the oil in the ground” that scientists have been shouting for decades do politicians not understand? What part of physics are politicians trying to deny?
I am opposed to allowing more oil tankers near our beautiful, fragile coast. I am vehemently opposed to marring our landscape with pipelines for transporting oil. Yes, $14 trillion dollars is a lot of money, but it will pale in comparison to the economic damage that exacerbating climate change will cause. Carbon capture and storage cannot offset our burn rate with any significance.
Earth has had a remarkably stable climate for tens of thousands of years; burning fossil fuels is destabilizing it.
I ask you to acknowledge that physics cannot be bargained with, show some foresight, protect our children's future, and care deeply about our planet's health. I ask that you tell our Prime Minister in no uncertain terms that selling fossil fuels is the wrong choice for the world and the wrong economic direction for Canada.
12 votes -
How Iran is running out of water
11 votes -
Farms and data centers contribute to a water pollution crisis in Eastern Oregon
13 votes -
A new take on Colombia’s cocaine hippos
25 votes -
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant appears set to begin restart
11 votes -
Norwegian fisherman creates urban lodgings for gull species threatened by climate change, predators and avian flu in their natural habitats. It's booked out.
12 votes -
Finland’s big idea: turning data center heat into power
10 votes -
In Alaska, fishing skippers and hungry orcas vie for halibut pulled from the deep
8 votes -
Denmark's climate minister, Lars Aagaard, announced that his government would submit a binding target to cut emissions by 82% by 2035 compared with 1990 levels
10 votes -
MIT researchers develop polymer film that could prevent solar panel corrosion
11 votes -
China’s CO2 emissions have been flat or falling for past eighteen months, analysis finds
41 votes -
Britain gives go-ahead to smaller nuclear reactor in Wales
10 votes