27 votes

Senator Richard Burr dumped up to $1.6 million of stock after reassuring public about coronavirus preparedness

13 comments

  1. [4]
    patience_limited
    Link
    From the article: While I know this is U.S.-centric, I encourage Tilders in other countries to be observant about similar instances of unspeakable venality and abuse of public trust in their...

    From the article:

    Soon after he offered public assurances that the government was ready to battle the coronavirus, the powerful chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Richard Burr, sold off a significant percentage of his stocks, unloading between $582,029 and $1.56 million of his holdings on Feb. 13 in 29 separate transactions.

    As the head of the intelligence committee, Burr, a North Carolina Republican, has access to the government’s most highly classified information about threats to America’s security. His committee was receiving daily coronavirus briefings around this time, according to a Reuters story.

    On Thursday, Burr came under fire after NPR obtained a secret recording from Feb. 27, in which the lawmaker gave a VIP group at an exclusive social club a much more dire preview of the economic impact of the coronavirus than what he had told the public.

    Burr’s public comments had been considerably less dire. In a Feb. 7 op-ed that he co-authored with another senator, he assured the public that “the United States today is better prepared than ever before to face emerging public health threats, like the coronavirus.” He wrote, “No matter the outbreak or threat, Congress and the federal government have been vigilant in identifying gaps in its readiness efforts and improving its response capabilities.”

    Burr was one of just three senators who in 2012 opposed the bill that explicitly barred lawmakers and their staff from using nonpublic information for trades and required regular disclosure of those trades. In opposing the bill, Burr argued at the time that insider trading laws already applied to members of Congress. President Barack Obama signed the bill, known as the STOCK Act, that year.

    While I know this is U.S.-centric, I encourage Tilders in other countries to be observant about similar instances of unspeakable venality and abuse of public trust in their politics. I sincerely hope the memories of the public and the press are long enough to get these robbers evicted at the polls.

    17 votes
    1. [3]
      Gaywallet
      Link Parent
      He's not the only one to profit off this.

      He's not the only one to profit off this.

      6 votes
      1. [2]
        patience_limited
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        It looks like you may have linked the same story twice? Is there another insider beneficiary besides Senator Loeffler? In any case, I'd love to see some prosecutions, and maybe a proper...

        It looks like you may have linked the same story twice? Is there another insider beneficiary besides Senator Loeffler? In any case, I'd love to see some prosecutions, and maybe a proper old-fashioned tar-and-feathering or two.

        And the footnote to all this is a security meeting January 24 that caused these people to dump stock, when they couldn't be bothered to engage public health authorities widely or warn the public for a month. [Let's not even discuss our Fearless Leader, who couldn't be bothered to acknowledge the pandemic until March 15. Be interesting to know how his investments have changed, though the hotels are probably taking a beating.]

        4 votes
        1. Gaywallet
          Link Parent
          Different pieces of information on what is essentially the same story, yes.

          Different pieces of information on what is essentially the same story, yes.

          1 vote
  2. [3]
    gpl
    Link
    Jesus. He needs to resign. This is completely and utterly unacceptable.

    Jesus. He needs to resign. This is completely and utterly unacceptable.

    8 votes
    1. EscReality
      Link Parent
      So is everything else in American politics recently, it doesn't seem to matter anymore. Even basic decorum is no longer a thing in politics like it used to be. I remember how much the public made...

      This is completely and utterly unacceptable.

      So is everything else in American politics recently, it doesn't seem to matter anymore.

      Even basic decorum is no longer a thing in politics like it used to be. I remember how much the public made fun of W's public speaking skills, but damn he sounds great when compared to the cheeto.

      8 votes
    2. babypuncher
      Link Parent
      But he's a Republican. They actively encourage this behavior.

      But he's a Republican. They actively encourage this behavior.

      2 votes
  3. [5]
    Uncharted
    Link
    I believe the STOCK Act has something to say about that. Senators were warned by the chair of the Intelligence committee about the potential effects of COVID-19 a while back:...

    I believe the STOCK Act has something to say about that.

    Senators were warned by the chair of the Intelligence committee about the potential effects of COVID-19 a while back: https://www.npr.org/2020/03/19/818192535/burr-recording-sparks-questions-about-private-comments-on-covid-19

    8 votes
    1. [2]
      patience_limited
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      And, who's going to enforce the act, or manage a successful prosecution? The STOCK Act has already been diluted, the Congressional Ethics Committee didn't pursue investigation or censure [PDF...

      And, who's going to enforce the act, or manage a successful prosecution?

      The STOCK Act has already been diluted, the Congressional Ethics Committee didn't pursue investigation or censure [PDF warning] a Representative who was later convicted under SEC securities fraud and insider trading laws. The history is illuminating.

      To date, no Senator has been prosecuted for prior violations, and the current Justice Department seems unlikely to investigate.

      The current Democrat-led House of Representatives has genuine reform legislation pending Senate review, but this mess isn't going to be cleaned up until the coronavirus crisis is past and Republicans are (hopefully) voted out of office.

      9 votes
      1. Uncharted
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        Yeah I'm under no illusion that he's going to face consequences, but it's still interesting that not only were his actions unethical, they were also most likely illegal. Edit: Thanks for all the...

        Yeah I'm under no illusion that he's going to face consequences, but it's still interesting that not only were his actions unethical, they were also most likely illegal.

        Edit: Thanks for all the links backing up your statements.

        5 votes
    2. [2]
      Deimos
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      The chair of the intelligence committee is Richard Burr, the subject of the article. It also mentions that he was one of only three senators that opposed the STOCK Act.

      The chair of the intelligence committee is Richard Burr, the subject of the article.

      It also mentions that he was one of only three senators that opposed the STOCK Act.

      3 votes
      1. Uncharted
        Link Parent
        Welp, I missed that both articles were about the same guy. Interesting. And yeah, it's no wonder that senators would vote against legislation that is intended to keep them from acting unethically.

        Welp, I missed that both articles were about the same guy. Interesting.

        And yeah, it's no wonder that senators would vote against legislation that is intended to keep them from acting unethically.

        2 votes
  4. skybrian
    (edited )
    Link
    Someone needs to investigate what else he's been doing since February 13. That's really early. Edit: I mean, imagine if he'd sold all this stock, and then announced that he had done so, and...

    Someone needs to investigate what else he's been doing since February 13. That's really early.

    Edit: I mean, imagine if he'd sold all this stock, and then announced that he had done so, and explained why. If you're shorting the market, isn't that's what you're supposed to do? It would send a very loud message to pay attention to this. If he'd done that then I'd say it was worth whatever money he made on it.

    2 votes