-
4 votes
-
What makes a good detective game?
7 votes -
Have MMO's lost the RPG?
7 votes -
Open source is democratizing video game development
9 votes -
'It gets better after 100 hours...'
7 votes -
Crafting is (kinda) pointless
10 votes -
How to combine video game genres
3 votes -
How accessible were this year's games?
6 votes -
Let me tell you why only a dumbass would get into NFT games
15 votes -
What's next for GMTK?
14 votes -
How videogames make the ultimate sacrifice
3 votes -
The Door Problem
5 votes -
Texture Archaeology, Cobblestone, and the most overused texture from the 90s
5 votes -
Creating a likeable video game villain
4 votes -
Vibe checks in video games
8 votes -
Why do so many games have tanks, healers and DPS?
11 votes -
The power of video game HUDs
8 votes -
Games that save the best for last
7 votes -
How accessible were this year's games?
9 votes -
The problem with multiple endings in video games
7 votes -
What are some games that work on the player's intent?
Today I rewatched the Game Maker's Toolkit video on Celeste: Why Does Celeste Feel So Good to Play? I recommend watching the entire video (and all of GMT's other content), but there's this...
Today I rewatched the Game Maker's Toolkit video on Celeste:
I recommend watching the entire video (and all of GMT's other content), but there's this fascinating point in the video, around the eleven-minute mark, when one of the developers of Celeste says "It's like working on the player's intent rather than making it a precise simulation".
What the developer is talking about in this quote are a few hidden features of Celeste that make the game more forgiving. For instance:
- The player can jump even a few frames after they have left a platform
- Dashing into a corner will gently curve the player around the corner rather than bringing them to a hard stop
- If the player tries to jump just a few frames before hitting the ground, the game will recognize their intent and perform the jump automatically once the player hits the ground
That last point is the most blatant example of what I am talking about. The game "realizes" what the player is trying to do, and allows them to do it, rather than punishing them for being off by a few frames/milliseconds. In this way, Celeste works on the player's intent, rather than sticking to the hard rules of its simulation.
I think that's a really fascinating and powerful idea, but I would also be very surprised if it were actually something new and unique.
So I wanted to ask, are there any other games that work on the player's intent? How exactly do they do it? Do they make the experience more forgiving like Celeste does, or are there any games that recognize the player's intent, but somehow make the game more difficult as a result?
Finally, just because I am curious, in what ways, both in and out of gameplay (such as interface design) could "working on the player's intent" be used to improve game and software experiences?
18 votes -
Croteam: Croatia's game dev pioneers
5 votes -
Pack-ratting in video games: How can developers encourage or discourage players from hoarding?
7 votes -
Video game subtitles are changing, don't be left behind
4 votes -
The invisible art of game titles
6 votes -
How accessible were this year's games?
6 votes -
My obsession with progression meters, and the art of shaping the player experience
6 votes -
Robin Sloan: Three things I learned about games while contributing writing to Neo Cab
4 votes -
What games are like for someone who doesn't play games
16 votes -
Squash and Stretch - The twelve principles of animation and how they apply to games
5 votes -
Free-to-Play games: Three key trade-offs
7 votes -
Level Design Patterns in 2D Games
5 votes -
Flaws of an undead genre - What's wrong with point and click adventures?
9 votes -
How music was made on Super Nintendo
6 votes