20 votes

Chinese-British citizen posts detailed explanation of reasoning behind Chinese views on Hong Kong/China/Blizzard situation

33 comments

  1. synergy
    (edited )
    Link
    as someone who grew up in Hong Kong and an american born chinese, i appreciate the OP on that post sharing his views. But a lot of what he said shows a lot of bias and misinformation, not sure if...

    as someone who grew up in Hong Kong and an american born chinese, i appreciate the OP on that post sharing his views. But a lot of what he said shows a lot of bias and misinformation, not sure if it's intentional due to how he simplifies a lot of the complex issues and history by just saying "google it". I also disagree with most of what he claims. Especially regarding the companies. When the hand over happened, most people were scared of what will happen to hong kong. Though those who wish that Hong Kong wouldn't go back to China were too scared to say anything. They don't want to be labeled as traitors to their own race especially with how the Brits obtained Hong Kong in the first place.

    Most people in Hong Kong knows independence isn't a reality. Hong Kong has no way of self sustaining, they even get their fresh water supply from the pearl river from China during the colonial days. The media is just framing it this way. I'm not sure whether its intentional or not to make the protesters look bad. What people in Hong Kong want is stability and the status quo with the continuation of one country two system. China wants Hong Kong to assimilate, but they got impatient and couldn't wait until 50 years promise has passed. It probably has something to do with more and more youths in Hong Kong do not identify themselves as Chinese.

    "China is not as totalitarian as you think"

    this statement in itself should show you what kinda bias he has.

    10 votes
  2. [23]
    LukeZaz
    (edited )
    Link
    For those who don't want to go to Reddit: Quoted post The discussion over there isn't actually all that bad though as far as Reddit goes. There are several good and detailed comments to be found...

    For those who don't want to go to Reddit:

    Quoted post

    If you are already angry reading the title and shout racist slurs or “get the fuck out 50cent army” then this post is not for you. I trust I should have some faith in the gaming community.

    After seeing and hearing so much I think I have a say in this.

    I am a Chinese British citizen, born and raised in China later immigrated to the UK, have spent over 15 years in both countries, well versed in social and political issues and themes in both cultures. And above all, a hardcore gamer. PC and console (PS2 in the past now Xbox), lost count of games I have played, probably well over 500 by now.

    And of course I was a die-hard Blizzard fan. Started with Warcraft 3, Starcraft (fun memories of Chinese Internet cafes lol), Diablo 1,2, then WoW, then Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 in the last few years etc…

    Blizzard in the West

    I said “was”, because I have seen the downfall of blizzard. Let me get this straight first, I really hate the Chinese influence of gaming in the West. Here, I mean gaming in general: micro-transactions, artistic direction (apparently some of the Hearthstone tuning of gore etc as of late). I, too, enjoyed the early days of PS2 story-driven, free unlockables, and limitless replayability without extra cost, no “early access”, “surprise mechanics”. It is absolutely disgraceful to see the likes of EA and Activation scamming young children and getting people addicted.

    China has a lot to blame for this, because of its monetary influence in these Western publishers.

    To me, and a lot of my gamer friends here in the UK, Blizzard have gone down hill since Diablo 3. They have become more money driven and egregious with their practices. With the merger of Activation and their public listing, I don’t need to say much more, I think we all know how to feel about the whole entity as a whole at present.

    Blizzard in China

    If you grew up in China in the 90’s like me, you will know how much influence Blizzard games had on our generation. Briefly mentioned above, Internet cafes used to be absolutely rampant in the country. If you know anything about China, in the 90s’, it was very poor (many are still today as well), even in big cities where Internet cafes were present. So IP wasn’t a thing. Millions of pirate copies of Starcraft and Warcraft 3 (among many other popular RTS and first person shooters) were what the owners depended their livelihood of. Now IP is much more strongly protected in entertainment industry as a whole, my generation feel the guilt towards Blizzard. Blizzard made their childhood memories but we all stole from them. So microtransactions in something like Hearthstone could make money off people so easily (as someone who never spends a penny on these I was absolutely gobsmacked to hear a Chinese friend of mine dropping the equivalent of $300 into Hearthstone to just to get in).

    Mobile Gaming

    Mobile gaming is so popular in China because of a number of reasons. To keep a simple: 1. They are not exposed to the “real gaming” we have the privilege to be. Like many in this community know, media control is ridiculous. Most of what you hear on the Internet about “Great Wall of China” is true, so I don’t need to elaborate; 2. Mobile cellular technology is more advanced in China, arguably more than the UK and US, even in the country side; 3. Lifestyle of people in cities are much more fast paced; 4. Most important, combined with number 1, no developer/publisher have the political or monetary power to compete with the giants such as Tencent and Netease. The likes of these most probably have a lot of say along with the official governmental bodies which give entertainment production the “go-ahead” to the marketplace. Yes, corruption can be involved. But maybe as a whole, the country may not be as corrupt as many may think (especially having seen how some gamers describe China since the incident).

    Hong Kong is No Laughing Matter

    If you are Chinese, AND British like me, you wouldn’t be very rushed to making a conclusion on making a stance.

    But I think, we, in the gaming community can sometimes be slightly naïve about geo-politics. After all, we game to escape from the reality, I get it. But hear me out.

    Many seem to be unaware, how HK was a colony of the British Empire in the first place. Put it simply, two Opium Wars. What are the Opium Wars? Quick links here: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars)

    Basically the arrogant Qing Dynasty wouldn’t trade with any Western powers, so the empires sold the Chinese opium in order to open its gates. The Qing government tried to fight against them, but failed, signed the treaty and gave up Hong Kong. In the late Qing Dynasty, opium problem was epidemic in the country. All men smoked it and it fucked up the country. Government was corrupt, Chinese citizens were hopeless, if you are interested, just google “Century of Humiliation”.

    The Brits ruled it for 156 years, introduced rule of law, capitalism. All good things of course, especially when China was controlled by the Communist Mao in the 20th century. But make no mistake, its prosperity is not because of its freedom, it’s because China was closed up (internal political turmoil etc.. more on this, search “Cultural Revolution”).

    Since 1997 the handover, China joined the WTO, cities like Shen Zhen and Guang Zhou gradually took the economic position of HK. Why would a Western company go to HK when it could directly reach over 1 billion consumers, so HK gradually became less relevant.

    For those of us that think HK was “free” under the UK rule, allow me to say you might be misled. A quick comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_1967_leftist_riots, the HK police killed 51 people in the 1967 extreme leftist riot (or I could call “patriotic demonstration” if I was biased). And, most importantly, HK citizens never had universal suffrage under the British rule. The UK government thought they were “democratic”, because it was democratic in the British parliament, which directly appointed the Chief Executive of HK.

    China has been gradually extending its “claws” into HK’s political and legislative system, I agree, hence I am supportive of the initial march by millions of citizens. But at the same time China is not as totalitarian as many make it out to be. I wish HK’s rule of law and relative freedom of speech never goes away, but I am also aware, Hong Kong (and especially Hong Kong) is and should always be China’s Hong Kong.

    I am over simplifying here, it’s a gaming community after all. But more on this, feel free to challenge/provide your thoughts.

    Western Reaction on the Matter

    What happened, is a clash to cultures.

    After watching the most vocal gaming YouTubers’ reaction on the matter, YongYea, The Quertering, AngryJoe, Jimquisition, Layman Gaming, HeelvsBabyface etc., it made me realise that the Western gaming community at large can be quite politically unaware.

    All of these guys I absolute admire, I subscribe to them, voice of the community, absolutely. But I don’t agree with some of their direct/indirect encouragement of protesting for “freedom of HK”.

    For some reason, the US and UK reaction of the HK matter has been the most one-sided story I have seen since my day one in UK. So to this degree, I don’t blame anyone’s responsive stance to stand for HK. But if you are really curious, I suggest you to google around, try to see the other side of the story on YouTube, see how other democratic Chinese spoken societies (Taiwan, Singapore) react to the whole thing, and what extreme violence has been committed lately, and also think, if the same thing happened here in the UK or US, what would the police do.

    I think making fun of Blizzard and China’s Pooh can be fun, but I think this advocacy can be “cheap”, we have very little to lose, but if people get really misled politically, many could die (need I say more).

    Note earlier I said “clash of cultures”. Believe me, a lot of reaction coming from mainland China towards NBA, South Park, Blizzard are not made by the government. Much of it is very negative, extreme even. I don’t agree the kind of rhetoric, but I can understand the rationale.

    To most of Chinese people, family is the upmost political correctness, like the Freedom of Speech, or Race Equality. To many, the unity of the country and the culture is the bigger “family”. So separate a part from its land is a fantasy, just like genocide is unimaginable now in today’s UK or USA. China has been relatively “homogenous”. The Chinese don’t value the latter two as much, because it didn’t have race relation troubles in its history, at least in the last 200 years. But if Race Relations cannot be kept in the USA, the country would break apart. If you don’t believe me, ask a Singaporean Chinese, Malaysian Chinese, Taiwanese Chinese, or even a British/American born Chinese, how important the unity of culture and the unity of family is to them.

    So for a foreign entity (like NBA or potentially Blizzard), who do not understand anything I have said above, to say stand with HK, is the greatest insult to the Chinese people. Hence the reaction or likely reaction in Blizzard’s case.

    I agree, that Chinese people are more sensitive on some issues than they should be, and not just boycott everything that touches their feelings. But again, you have to understand what it has been through in the last 200 years. And just a thought, how many countries have China invaded ever?

    This is why the Chinese think we the West are the bully and downright ignorant, and why we in the West think the Chinese commies are the bully.

    Blizzard’s Weibo Post

    From the wording of the original post, in Chinese, I can see that it was probably written by a Chinese official. Mark Kern highlighted this in his live stream with The Quartering, and I think he might be right. The tone is very much a communist official’s tone, just like the kind you see on everyday media in China. But I think this is Blizzard using its “China knowledge”, because it understands the market (as per above), so doing the pre-damage controlling. I also think they should have just pulled him off behind the scene and warn him like many YouTubers suggested, instead of all guns-blazing using Weibo to please the Chinese gamers. Blizzard underestimated the power of internet and people’s willingness to research in general.

    How We Should Move On

    Finally, if you have been with me this far, I hope this gives you some insight. I am not telling you to not stand with HK, at the end of day that is your freedom. I am simply providing some insight and background to the whole story. I just think if you do, be aware of what you stand for, and why. Personally, both democracy and Freedom of Speech are relative. I enjoy voting for my government here in the UK, and I enjoy writing this post here on Reddit (probably not possible in China), but I also believe in reason, as well as the “overall positive attitude and hopefulness of the majority Chinese people under the regime”. Ask any foreign person who has been or lived in China.

    As for the Western game developer/publishers, including Blizzard, I think they should focus on the games first, not country. This is why Blizzard got so big in the first place in China, because it made good games. The “Cyberpunks” of today are probably being pirated somewhere in the even less developed world (this is also why gaming studios go online more and more, the potential player base is unimaginably massive), but just know: if you make good games, they will be your loyal paying players one day.

    China is no longer pirating games, but the gamers know when a good game is a good game. The mobile gamers of China, too, want the quality of games that we get to play. I think censoring is ok, and every country has its own censorship (even here in the West), but don’t forget, make a good game first. Make the Lich Kings, the Deckerd Cains of today first.

    If you are from China over the wall reading this, I want you to know: just be more confident in the culture, have some faith in its gaming community in the long term. Don’t boycott everything, the general public of the West don’t want China to be demolished all the time!

    And if you are Tencent or NetEase, instead of bribing the officials in letting your shitty mobile version of everything through the Chinese internet, why not grow some balls. Put money in the long term gaming industry in the country, let the work do the talk. Sell the country and the culture through good games.

    I know all of this is a fantasy, but this is how I feel.

    The discussion over there isn't actually all that bad though as far as Reddit goes. There are several good and detailed comments to be found too, some of which I've quoted below:

    Other notable posts

    Hong Konger detailing protest events and why it all occurred

    I am a Hong Konger. Very detailed post from gaming, China and Hong Kong background. I just want to leave some comments about the Hong Kong issue in case you guys understand the story in Hong Kong since June differently.

    The chronological story is that the government proposes the extradition bill, Hk citizens are using the peaceful way by having marches to express their opinion. But the CE refuses to compromise so that on 12/6, a lot of citizens surrounded the legislative council without over violence (compared to what you see today), however, I personally think the police had used an unnecessary violence (https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/ASA1705762019ENGLISH.pdf). Therefore, after this first turning point, most of the protestors are focusing on five demands(withdraw extradition bill, withdraw the definition of riot, unconditional release of arrested protestors, set up independent enquiry of the incident, dual universal suffrage).

    However, what I point out is we Hong Kongers do not show our hope to be independent. What frustrating is that most of the Chinese media uses “HK independence” to describe the objective of the movement in the HK. So I am also really confused when some of my Chinese friends asked whether we were trying to be independent in June to July. Therefore I guess all the media shown in Weibo and WeChat inform the Chinese citizen that we want to be independent, but the truth is not.

    So what I am trying to say is I feel like all the clash between HKer and mainlander in oversea usually in school or protest, the reason for happening that is CCP tried to labelize HK with independence, so that mainlander would hate HKer, and HKer will also hate mainlander since they misunderstand us.

    So that’s the story between June to August. In September to October, a lot of issue happens internationally. Perhaps some people are really thinking about HK independence, but that’s not the majority. I personally focus on five demands because it reflects all the fault the CE had done which leads HK to become a police state today.

    Also, if you try to think that if a city want to be independent, there must be army, but HK does not have any. Are we that stupid to claim independence without army? I still trust the one country two systems because it can most beneficial to Hk and China, hk still belongs to China, as long as China stop putting their “claw” on Hong Kong because a lot of HKer feels like it is no longer “two systems”. However, it depends on what president Xi is thinking.

    Feel free to leave you comment. I also appreciate your understanding to Hong Kong history!

    Australian working on jurisprudence essay regarding HK situation explains reasons for Western views of China as totalitarian to OP

    Hey man, I just did a good chunk of a Jurisprudence essay on the situation in HK. I really do appreciate the effort in your post and I'm actually a little hesitant to reply due to having drastically different views from you and not wanting to let my emotions bring down a high effort post.

    If you would like to see why a lot of us have an incredibly hard time crediting any pro PRC stance feel free to have a look at some of the sources below:

    Human Rights Watch, “China - Events of 2018” (Human Rights Watch, 2018)

    Amnesty International, “The State of the World’s Human Rights: China 2018/2019” (Amnesty International, 2019)

    I do have a bunch more but those are extremely detailed and high-quality reports. Another source I would like to include due to the good analysis contained within is:

    U.S Embassy & Consulates in China, “China 2018 Human Right Report”, (2018, United States Department of State)

    Of course, I understand that due to the publishing source you may have your own doubts on that last one. Just to calarify I am an Australian and pretty anti-American right now as I have family who fought with the Kurds in Syria, Im no uncle sam fan.

    If you would like to understand why this has provoked such an intense reaction from westerners it may help to be aware of a western idea called "the tolerance paradox", which on a basic level suggests that:

    The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that, "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance."

    Many people see this as the beginning of China starting to flex its muscle on the world stage through media influence which is one of the recognised signs that a dictatorship is worsening (Source: Sohail Khalid, “Prophets of Violence - Prophets of Peace” (White Knight Publishing, 2005))

    Here is a quick thing I personally find removes any defence you might be able to make of this being a debate where both sides shopuld be assumed to be acting in good faith. How can we trust the PRC to engage in any kind of compromise when they promote things like this"

    With particular concern being directed at the establishment of the National Supervisory Commission within the People’s Republic of China in 2018, an office “which is empowered to detain incommunicado anyone exercising public authority for up to six months without fair trial procedures in a system called ‘liuzhi’”.

    Further explanation of Chinese feelings regarding family/unity

    To most of Chinese people, family is the upmost political correctness, like the Freedom of Speech, or Race Equality. To many, the unity of the country and the culture is the bigger “family”. So separate a part from its land is a fantasy, just like genocide is unimaginable now in today’s UK or USA. China has been relatively “homogenous”. The Chinese don’t value the latter two as much, because it didn’t have race relation troubles in its history, at least in the last 200 years. But if Race Relations cannot be kept in the USA, the country would break apart. If you don’t believe me, ask a Singaporean Chinese, Malaysian Chinese, Taiwanese Chinese, or even a British/American born Chinese, how important the unity of culture and the unity of family is to them.

    I gotta quote this part for truth. Too many Westerners simply do not understand how much a Mainland Chinese value this.

    There's also the debate of Liberty vs Prosperity, a Mainland Chinese will choose Prosperity 99% of the time, simply because in the past few decades, life in Mainland China geniunely sucked and CCP really did improve the life of majority of Chinese a lot (They screwed up big with The Great Leap Forward, no argument about that) so why wouldn't they support CCP? To modern Westerners, Freedom is a basic human right, but to Mainland Chinese, it's a privilege that comes AFTER you're well off. Cultural differences aside, Western and Japanese invasions of China such as Opium War*, Eight-Nation Alliance, First & Second Sino-Japanese War were taught in every Chinese school, and all of them managed to sent the same message: "If you're powerless, you have no right."(弱國無外交/弱国无外交)【Yes I understand 外交 is suppose to mean Diplomacy, but that really doesn't fit the context】

    Fun fact: In Mandarin Chinese, Power (权力/權力) and Right (权利/權利)are pronounced exactly the same. Given how languages reflect thought and culture, it should tell you a little about Chinese culture...

    *Personally, I think Qing Dynasty brought the Opium War upon itself with its foreign policies and deserves the humiliating beatdown, but that's not the main point here and good luck explaining this to average Mainland Chinese.

    Update: OP has made a general reply as a top-level comment on the thread, responding primarily about Chinese gov't totalitarianism:

    Second post

    Hey all,

    First of all, thanks for reading the long post, it is a long one after all.

    As a first timer, to see all of these responses is absolutely overwhelming, I never normally post things publicly on Internet, but thought I'd share a different perspective on this particular topic because of my personal circumstances. I simply wanted to shed some light on the other side of the coin, in my own opinion I didn't choose side, but many thought I defend tyranny. I don't wish to change people's mind over night, I simply wanted to show one Chinese person's interpretation based on his life experiences. After all, I don't trust any non-Chinese here speaks fluent Chinese and would have gone to the other side and research for him/herself?

    It's impossible to reply to every one of you, so I will make a universal reply, hopefully elaborating some of the biggest issues you have brought to my attention. This will be the closure from my side. I have a life to live and many games to play lol.

    The biggest viewpoint is that China is totalitarian, and many provided detailed response, evidence etc. I think a lot of it is very new to me as well, again impossible to read everything now but I will when I can. And I can understand sentiment why China is so evil from your view.

    To those of you who are genuinely keen in learning "why China isn't as totalitarian as many make it out to be", here is a few brief points, again, all personal, take it as you will:

    1. The West still have the dominance in the world media, and I do tend to see the one-sidedness when it comes to international geo-politics (unlike the domestic politics - right and left arguments are obviously very transparent and can be polarising). So I do wish to see other countries reporting on the Xinjiang issue as well, and not just the typical "Western big economies", perhaps they do, just I am not exposed to them.
    2. China is vast, if you live in Europe, the population is almost 3 times the EU's, if USA 4 times. So a lot of things happen there everyday. It is always unfair that individuals suffer mistreatment, but it happens everywhere in the world (I know the lightness of this sentence for such a serious notion, but I am not an academic in the field, afraid that's all I have time for now).
    3. People can live a normal life in China, they have the right for education, choose the partner, employer, buy and sell, go abroad for holiday, enjoy entertainment etc... you can work hard, achieve more. Shelter, food, transportation, family and friends.... Many of these things weren't even possible a few decades ago (and yes I know, CCP partly to blame)
    4. People do talk and joke about the government and the affairs, in public and private. Many also "disseminate". You could probably get banned for "disseminate" on Internet (i.e. account suspended etc), but it's far away from being jailed. For the years I lived there (and today through friends and families), I do not know anyone who has been jailed because of their voice, nor have I heard from anyone who knows such a person.
    5. If the country is so tyrannical and oppressive, why would the tourists and international students not flee. Ask them what they think of the country and the government. And similarly, more foreign and first world people study and work there than before.

    I do want to make it clear though, if the Uyghurs really suffer as badly as what these medias say, I think it's wrong, and I hope things can improve in the future.

    And also, I haven't said China's government is perfect, or even good. They should be more democratic, and I think they will, gradually in the future. I just think there could be a slightly different story than what people had in mind. But it seems that most people here already have very sound understanding of it all anyway.

    If I offended you as a overseas Chinese by over-generalising, then my apologies. One person's experiences can be limiting. But to me there seems to be more intimacy and closeness between two follow Chinese men than that of two British men. Just pure observation and travel and other people's personal experiences

    Finally if you really think I am a pawn of the CCP, I would be really worried if I were you, because this kind of propaganda is a whole new level don't you think lol

    8 votes
    1. [4]
      Sahasrahla
      Link Parent
      Like has been mentioned this post is great for insight into a certain mindset but, though politely and thoughtfully put, it falls far short of anything approaching human decency and sympathy. This...
      • Exemplary

      "Imperialism by X is bad, therefore imperialism by Y is good."

      Like has been mentioned this post is great for insight into a certain mindset but, though politely and thoughtfully put, it falls far short of anything approaching human decency and sympathy. This isn't the UK vs China, China's current actions are not justified by the "century of humiliation", and... you know what? Responding over and over to the never-ending torrent of pro-CCP arguments is tiring and soul crushing so let's take this to bullet-points and turn up the snark:

      • This isn't the UK vs China. Come on now. The UK is embroiled in their own mess and as far as I know there's no chance of them doing the one thing Hong Kongers have asked of them, i.e. giving full UK citizenship to Hong Kongers born before the handover. They've made some calls for support, sure, but by that measure they've hardly done more than some rando in a comment section. Since 1997 this has been about Hong Kong and Beijing.

      • "Century of humiliation!" Oh fuck off with that. Lots of countries have suffered some period of "humiliation" at the hands of exploitative neighbours or empires and many have gotten over it because the alternative is an endless cycle of hatred and reprisal. And, more to the point, how many authoritarian regimes have used that "humiliation" and their subsequent "return to greatness" to justify their own rule and all of their actions?

      • "Hong Kong is and always has been a part of China!" Okay, what is Hong Kong? Is it the land under your feet or is it the city and its people? Because when the territory of Hong Kong was stolen (yeah, let's not mince words here) there was no city of several million there. The city and its people and its culture as we know it today came about when it was under colonial occupation and its residents had no say when they were handed over to another colonial power. (Yes, China's a colonial power too.) So the land (all 0.35 Rhode Islands worth of it!) belonged to China but the people and the city never did until 1997. When people say China owns Hong Kong they mean it used to own the land so now it should own the people. Yeah, owning people, another concept that can be fucked off about by anyone who advocates it.

      "And just a thought, how many countries have China invaded ever?"

      • Uh, more than zero? Like I don't have an exact number but it's not hard to think of recent examples. Tibet was independent, Xinjiang was independent (briefly, to be fair). They certainly didn't take a vote before they were annexed. China fought a war with Vietnam. China fought tooth and nail to "liberate" North Korea and have propped them up ever since. There have been border skirmishes with India. War with the Soviet Union looked possible for a while there. And, let's not forget the constant threats to invade and annex Taiwan, an independent and democratic nation with the misfortune of sharing a complex history with China. Notice a common theme here, though: when China invades its neighbours (or threatens to) it's not framed as "China invading its neighbours", no, of course not. The nationalists and apologists will tell you that China is simply liberating its rightful territory. So yeah, China has never invaded anything as long as you accept the same imperialist/colonial excuses about how all the places they invaded were their rightful territory or vassals anyway.

      • "China's territorial integrity!" The holy-of-holies must-not-be-violated justification and motivation that makes everything China does a-okay. Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang, the South China Sea? All justified because look at this Qing era map! Except (even leaving aside arguments about how this is a poor justification anyway and "we owned that land 200 years ago" is an attitude which will/has led to endless war and misery) even the nationalists are hypocrites on this one. You know what else is on all those Qing empire maps? Mongolia, large parts of far eastern Russia, and parts of Kazakhstan. But how often do you hear Chinese nationalists beating their chests about Russia-occupied Manchuria? Never, because the CCP sees no geopolitical advantage in trying to get those territories "back". So how can "China's historical territorial integrity must be recovered and maintained something something century of humiliation" work as a justification when it's not even followed by those who argue it? Easy, because all that nationalistic rhetoric is post hoc justification for what the CCP wants anyway.

      China has been relatively “homogenous”.

      • Because of a thousands year history of conquest and assimilation that continues today. Differences in history, culture, language, ethnicity, and even nationality among different peoples within China's borders have been minimized, erased, or repressed. I'm sure if Europe were a single state under Rome or Germany or whoever we'd all be told about how homogeneous they are too. And really, is this a justification anything? "We're all a big happy family, and if one family member doesn't do what the family patriarch says they'll be tortured until they do! Because that's what love is!" (And, yeah, HK protesters are being tortured in custody.)

      • There's a lot more to say (I feel like I could write a goddamn book on this subject, with chapter titles like "Asshole, you live in a free and democratic nation but you support torture and oppression elsewhere to protect your fragile pride" and "Whataboutism: why more than one thing can be bad at once and how both can be criticized by anyone") but I want to end by saying something nice. You know what? You might not guess it from my comment so far but I actually really like China and support it 100%. Just, I support it in the same way as a Bush/Trump hating American or westerner might support the US. I criticize the CCP and the arguments of their apologists because I care about China and its people. (As well as those affected by their actions). Hell, I don't even support Tibet/Xinjiang independence: like any other colonized territory they've been settled for decades and by now those "settlers" and their descendents can claim those areas as their homelands as much as anyone else; any political solution and reconciliation must respect their human rights as well. I really want what's best for China and its people, I just don't buy the argument that the CCP is providing that or that "basic human rights" (like not having you and your father disappeared for splashing ink on a portrait of Xi Jinping, yeah look it up that happened) are some nefarious western idea that Chinese people don't deserve. (And, if any Chinese citizens are reading this and are still offended: welcome to being a world power. Ask an American how to deal with criticism from abroad and at home, they're not always good at it but at least they have practice.)

      16 votes
      1. [3]
        AnthonyB
        Link Parent
        Overall, I think this is a fantastic comment (as usual), but I'm not sure it's directed at the right person. I'm having a similar conversation with someone else in this thread, and unless I keep...

        Overall, I think this is a fantastic comment (as usual), but I'm not sure it's directed at the right person. I'm having a similar conversation with someone else in this thread, and unless I keep reading it incorrectly, I don't think the OP sympathizes with the Chinese government; rather, they're just providing context as to how other Chinese people might disagree with the protests. If anything, there is a little inner conflict and fence-sitting given their personal history, but OP did mention their support for the protests a few times.

        4 votes
        1. [2]
          Sahasrahla
          Link Parent
          Right, I want to make clear it's not quite directed at them (and, like, if they were here in this thread instead of this being linked from elsewhere I'd want to take a less... let's say...

          Right, I want to make clear it's not quite directed at them (and, like, if they were here in this thread instead of this being linked from elsewhere I'd want to take a less... let's say "frustrated" tone) more it's using that as a jumping off point to somewhat rail against some of these ideas.

          Honestly this goes back quite a ways. Maybe I've mentioned it before but I really started noticing this kind of thing back during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. China was using it as propaganda (hey, can't fault that, that's basically what the Olympics are for, and my own country tried the same thing in 2010 Vancouver but we're just not very good at it) and there was a bit of pushback from some people in the west of "wait, what about Tibet and stuff?" This created a pretty big backlash where seemingly every Chinese or Chinese-descended person I knew went super nationalistic on social media for a while.

          Though, just to be clear, we should be very careful that the observation of "sometimes Chinese people in the west support not-great actions by China" doesn't turn into some kind of "Jews/Catholics/etc. have divided loyalties!" argument. That's really not where we need to go as a society.

          Anyway, there's lots more to say but there's a lot of other things I should be doing as well. I'll look forward to more good conversation later.

          7 votes
          1. AnthonyB
            Link Parent
            Indeed. Unfortunately, our small interactions always occur when I stay up waaay to late on a school night and don't have time to give a meaningful response the next day. I do want to say though...

            Anyway, there's lots more to say but there's a lot of other things I should be doing as well. I'll look forward to more good conversation later.

            Indeed. Unfortunately, our small interactions always occur when I stay up waaay to late on a school night and don't have time to give a meaningful response the next day. I do want to say though that my political beliefs are actually much closer to yours than you might think. It seems like you have a much greater passion for these issues.

            1 vote
    2. [6]
      Greg
      Link Parent
      As an insight into how OP sees the situation, it's a brilliant post; as a facet to the larger debate, there are a few issues that really stood out to me. This, and the whole section preceding it...

      As an insight into how OP sees the situation, it's a brilliant post; as a facet to the larger debate, there are a few issues that really stood out to me.

      I am also aware, Hong Kong (and especially Hong Kong) is and should always be China’s Hong Kong.

      This, and the whole section preceding it on Hong Kong's history, completely omits any hint of discussion about self determination. Framing it as China vs. UK, superpower vs. ex-superpower, reduces Hong Kong from a vibrant city of millions with its own distinct culture to nothing more than a bargaining chip. Just because the UK was wrong doesn't mean that China isn't also wrong.

      I was surprised as hell to see one of the replies from a resident saying they don't want independence, but that's exactly my point: it's their damn choice. Not China's, not Britains, but Hong Kong's. And yes, I very much apply the same logic to Scotland, Catalonia, and wherever else anyone might care to mention. The fact that the loss of territory might hurt the country I live in doesn't negate the fact that it's their right to choose. I see that as perhaps the highest test of morality: for a person to advocate for others' rights even when they might be exercised to their detriment.

      But if you are really curious, I suggest you to google around, try to see the other side of the story on YouTube, see how other democratic Chinese spoken societies (Taiwan, Singapore) react to the whole thing, and what extreme violence has been committed lately, and also think, if the same thing happened here in the UK or US, what would the police do.

      I can't be sure, but this sounds like they're accusing the protesters of the "extreme violence", not the police. From what I have seen via generally trustworthy press sources, as well as the small amount I was (entirely coincidentally) there to witness in person, that is very much not the case. As for UK/US police, they might well react similarly. And that's a huge problem that we should all be addressing; it's the precise opposite of a justification.

      I agree, that Chinese people are more sensitive on some issues than they should be, and not just boycott everything that touches their feelings. But again, you have to understand what it has been through in the last 200 years. And just a thought, how many countries have China invaded ever?

      Harder to answer when the party line is "all of this was always our territory", but to answer the subtext it's fair to say that the British Empire was in many ways absolutely abhorrent and should never have happened. Again, though, I would be the first to criticise the British government and their history - the framing here is again gently leading towards a "which country is better/worse" debate, and that is counterproductive. It's not an "us vs them" situation; I want everyone judged by the same standards for everyone's wellbeing and I will be the first to hold my own government to account when they overstep that mark.

      20 votes
      1. [4]
        RapidEyeMovement
        Link Parent
        I agree to much of your post, but this is where you lost me a little. This hard line about independence has never been a point of the protest and bringing it up muddies the water it almost appears...

        I agree to much of your post, but this is where you lost me a little.

        I was surprised as hell to see one of the replies from a resident saying they don't want independence, but that's exactly my point: it's their damn choice. Not China's, not Britains, but Hong Kong's. And yes, I very much apply the same logic to Scotland, Catalonia, and wherever else anyone might care to mention. The fact that the loss of territory might hurt the country I live in doesn't negate the fact that it's their right to choose. I see that as perhaps the highest test of morality: for a person to advocate for others' rights even when they might be exercised to their detriment.

        This hard line about independence has never been a point of the protest and bringing it up muddies the water it almost appears you are putting 'words in their mouths'. I think t is important to push for what they are actually demanding: Five Demands .

        7 votes
        1. [3]
          Greg
          Link Parent
          That's a fair point - I definitely didn't word it as well as I could have done. I wasn't intending to speak for the protesters, I was more saying that it still surprises me that independence isn't...

          That's a fair point - I definitely didn't word it as well as I could have done. I wasn't intending to speak for the protesters, I was more saying that it still surprises me that independence isn't seen as an end goal because that's what I'd be fighting for, and whether or not that is the goal of the residents, they are the ones with the right to make the determination. I've also been guilty of conflating "democracy" (which is a demand) with "independence" (which is not) even in my own mind, and that's totally on me.

          I was trying to say that even the most extreme outcome should be in their hands, but I can totally see that referencing that as a point of principle can skew the argument away from the actual reality of the situation.

          7 votes
          1. [2]
            RapidEyeMovement
            Link Parent
            I point that out, because the Chinese government is using that talking point, that they want independence, as wedge against the protestors and mainland Chinese population. Chinese government are...

            I point that out, because the Chinese government is using that talking point, that they want independence, as wedge against the protestors and mainland Chinese population. Chinese government are not recognizing the Five Demands and painting over it with a very wide brush

            I also agree that a people have a right to determine their own future

            7 votes
            1. Greg
              Link Parent
              Yup, definitely makes sense, and accuracy is doubly important in the face of propaganda or misinformation.

              Yup, definitely makes sense, and accuracy is doubly important in the face of propaganda or misinformation.

              4 votes
      2. Litmus2336
        Link Parent
        Totally agree. This is the issue with naive decolonization narratives - the answers to unjust colonial power structures is not the return to unjust precolonial power structures.

        Totally agree. This is the issue with naive decolonization narratives - the answers to unjust colonial power structures is not the return to unjust precolonial power structures.

        3 votes
    3. [3]
      crowbahr
      Link Parent
      I'm not sure I can really buy that line.

      But at the same time China is not as totalitarian as many make it out to be.

      I'm not sure I can really buy that line.

      10 votes
      1. that_knave
        Link Parent
        Right? Someone should tell that to the Uyghurs. The government isn’t that bad, you’re just making it seem like a full scale genocide.

        Right? Someone should tell that to the Uyghurs. The government isn’t that bad, you’re just making it seem like a full scale genocide.

        9 votes
      2. LukeZaz
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        Yeah, virtually every top-level comment in the thread is calling foul on that bit, with a whole lot to back it up at that. Edit: OP made a second post addressing this.

        Yeah, virtually every top-level comment in the thread is calling foul on that bit, with a whole lot to back it up at that.

        Edit: OP made a second post addressing this.

        4 votes
    4. [5]
      Comment deleted by author
      Link Parent
      1. [4]
        AnthonyB
        Link Parent
        Hmmm. I think you might be exemplifying their point here. The poster isn't taking a stance, they're just pointing out that for China, unlike the US, or the modern day UK, democracy and freedom of...

        Hmmm. I think you might be exemplifying their point here. The poster isn't taking a stance, they're just pointing out that for China, unlike the US, or the modern day UK, democracy and freedom of speech is not baked into the culture and therefore is not a major value (I'm not an expert on China, but I do currently live in Beijing and have talked to enough people about this to agree with that general premise). So depending on where you're from, you're going to see the protests differently. The general response from people online has pretty much ignored this massive "clash of cultures," and responded as if the western democratic aporoach is the only correct way to see the world, while simultaneously being generally unaware of the complexity of the situation, which is why op goes on to say

        This is why the Chinese think we the West are the bully and downright ignorant, and why we in the West think the Chinese commies are the bully.

        5 votes
        1. Sahasrahla
          Link Parent
          Democracy wasn't baked into the culture anywhere else it took hold, either. (Including in 'culturally Chinese' Taiwan.) It's true that not everyone in China wants democracy, and probably not even...

          Democracy wasn't baked into the culture anywhere else it took hold, either. (Including in 'culturally Chinese' Taiwan.) It's true that not everyone in China wants democracy, and probably not even a majority of people there want it, but that doesn't mean very concept of human rights just goes out the window. Human rights aren't just a "western" idea that only applies to certain people based on ancestry, they're a universal ideal that everyone deserves. (And, while I'm undecided about whether or not "democracy" is a human right I believe self-determination is, and you often need one for the other. Also, no matter how "complex" China's history is, that shouldn't be used as a smokescreen for genocide or colonialism.)

          Also, it's worth noting that while people on the streets of Beijing don't see democracy as a worthwhile value (what happened to everyone in Beijing who liked democracy, anyway? I feel like it was a popular idea there in 1989) people in Hong Kong very evidently do see democracy as something that's part of their culture. Why should a colonial power in Beijing get a veto on that?

          (Also, as to why I keep referring to China as "colonial": they've spent decades settling Han Chinese in territories they annexed in Tibet and Xinjiang. It's not so different from the history of the Canadian or American west.)

          7 votes
        2. [3]
          Comment deleted by author
          Link Parent
          1. [2]
            AnthonyB
            Link Parent
            First, how can you present multiple viewpoints fairly without making them seem equal? Second, OP stated multiple times that they support the protests. On a personal note for those who may...

            First, how can you present multiple viewpoints fairly without making them seem equal? Second, OP stated multiple times that they support the protests. Also, I don't think apartheid South Africa is a fair comparison for this situation, though I'll admit that I'm not familair enough with either situation, so please correct me if I'm wrong. This is a unique situation, but if I were to pull a comparison from the top of my head, I'd say this is probably closer to Northern Ireland than South Africa.

            On a personal note for those who may recognize my username on this small site (no need to reply to this), over the past few weeks I've posted several comments in threads about China that tend to go against the popular opinion on this site. I want to make it clear that I do not, in any way, support the actions that the Chinese government has taken against the protesters in Hong Kong, and I am deeply disturbed by what is happening to the Uighurs in Xinjiang. In fact, I am bothered by these things enough that it's become a major factor in my decision to stay in the country when my work contract expires. Having said all that, when I see the sentiment in these threads that props China up as a big bad boogey man, I can't help but think of all the wonderful people I have encountered and the dozens of children that I've taught whom I love and adore. I think it's important to remember that despite the atrocities of the government, there is still a country made up of a billion+ good people, and we should all do our best to understand each other and our differences. That was cheesy and lame, but it's 3:30am so whatever.

            3 votes
            1. Sahasrahla
              Link Parent
              Easily? I mean, you could fairly explain what 'climate change skeptics' or creationists believe without making it sound like they had valid points of view. You could even present multiple...

              First, how can you present multiple viewpoints fairly without making them seem equal?

              Easily? I mean, you could fairly explain what 'climate change skeptics' or creationists believe without making it sound like they had valid points of view. You could even present multiple viewpoints you yourself hold but make it clear which ones you're certain of and which ones you're kind of not sure about.

              I think it's important to remember that despite the atrocities of the government, there is still a country made up of a billion+ good people, and we should all do our best to understand each other and our differences.

              Agree 100%. China is not evil and the Chinese people are not evil, and even people who support some pretty vile things are deserving of sympathy and are likely not bad people, just people who have had certain ideas presented to them without much chance for alternative viewpoints to be fairly considered. (e.g. I have at least one friend who's strongly against gay marriage because of her Christian beliefs, but she has gay friends and is one of the nicest people I know; she just has as part of her culture and upbringing a religion that tells her she must believe certain things, and it's hard to get yourself out of that. To an extent, I think we really need to be more sympathetic and understanding of people like that instead of throwing them all in the same box with the bigots. Anyway, in terms of actions she's the kind of Christian who volunteers at soup kitchens rather than the kind that protests abortion clinics, no matter what beliefs she's been made to have.)

              On a personal note for those who may recognize my username on this small site (no need to reply to this), over the past few weeks I've posted several comments in threads about China that tend to go against the popular opinion on this site.

              Yeah, thanks for your perspective. I think even though we seem to disagree on some things we're each coming from the same place of compassion for other people and are informed by our own experiences with China and its people.

              6 votes
    5. [5]
      RapidEyeMovement
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      Wait is this a literal threat of violence about Winnie-the-Pooh references

      Wait is this a literal threat of violence about Winnie-the-Pooh references

      I think making fun of Blizzard and China’s Pooh can be fun, but I think this advocacy can be “cheap”, we have very little to lose, but if people get really misled politically, many could die (need I say more).

      3 votes
      1. [3]
        Leonidas
        Link Parent
        I didn't really interpret it that way, I just thought they were making a good point about the fact that many people who are advocating for Hong Kong with memes and things like that don't really...

        I didn't really interpret it that way, I just thought they were making a good point about the fact that many people who are advocating for Hong Kong with memes and things like that don't really have skin in the game, so they should consider the real-world ramifications of what they're pushing. However, there were definitely undertones of "don't disrespect the people in power, or any violence against you is your responsibility." Just my perspective on it.

        5 votes
        1. [2]
          RapidEyeMovement
          Link Parent
          Interesting, at least it wasn't that overt. First it feels like this was written by a couple of people, because some parts are written with a very western tone, while others feel like poor...

          Interesting, at least it wasn't that overt.

          First it feels like this was written by a couple of people, because some parts are written with a very western tone, while others feel like poor translations. The use of the "need I say more" feels like a colloquialism that cannot be easily translated to English, there seems to be a lot of weight give to that phrase. It is used multiple times always with ominous undertones and an implied power threats.

          3 votes
          1. Leonidas
            Link Parent
            That's an interesting angle which I really hadn't considered. Based on my non-analytical reading of the language it uses, the post seems about right for someone who was born speaking a different...

            That's an interesting angle which I really hadn't considered. Based on my non-analytical reading of the language it uses, the post seems about right for someone who was born speaking a different language, then moved to an English-speaking country and spent a while there. I'd assume people eventually pick up colloquialisms like that. However, it's certainly valid to consider the possibility of this being some kind of collaborative effort.

            3 votes
      2. 9000
        Link Parent
        My reading of that was more that Westerners don't have much to lose by making fun of China and supporting Hong Kong, but Hong Kongers do. And, in tandem with that, Westerners also tend to have a...

        My reading of that was more that Westerners don't have much to lose by making fun of China and supporting Hong Kong, but Hong Kongers do. And, in tandem with that, Westerners also tend to have a much less nuanced and informed view than Hong Kongers. So, if they continue to provide pressure without understanding whether they are actually helping the cause or not, it could push tensions over into violence.

        For instance, there had been talk in this very thread about confusion over whether independence is a Hong Kong goal or a Chinese party line that the West is parroting, making a needless wedge issue. If the Chinese start chanting about how Hong Kong shouldn't be independent and the US starts chanting that they should, the only people who get screwed over are Hong Kong, because they aren't being listened to by either side.

        3 votes
  3. [9]
    moocow1452
    Link
    I guess from their point of view, it's as if Texas or California wanted to cede from the union. We probably wouldn't let that happen, because last time a state tried to cede from the US it was...

    I guess from their point of view, it's as if Texas or California wanted to cede from the union. We probably wouldn't let that happen, because last time a state tried to cede from the US it was kind of a disaster, and Texas in particular is "under dispute" as an American State in your fringier circles. But internationally, Hong Kong is recognized as Hong Kong, China until 2047, and the extradition laws would be an attempt to alter the deal, as if people could be disappeared by the mainland, that would infringe a little bit on the two system setup.

    China, however, would see it as theirs to mess with, and an embarrassment that they can't keep it in line. So that ramble to say that this is a difficult situation and someone's probably going to cross a hard line and we'll have to sort out how we react to it. (Probably with concern and no political action, cause that's how this usually plays out.)

    6 votes
    1. RapidEyeMovement
      Link Parent
      Isn't this the propaganda that the Chinese government has been pushing from the beginning? Framing it as HK wants to break away from China. When it has never been one of the Five Demands of the...

      Isn't this the propaganda that the Chinese government has been pushing from the beginning? Framing it as HK wants to break away from China. When it has never been one of the Five Demands of the protestors. I'm not sure the the whole cede analogy works.

      It is also interesting that some of the framing from the Western media seems to be highlighting Free HK and never dig into what that actually means.

      10 votes
    2. [3]
      Gaywallet
      Link Parent
      Eh, I think the real reason the US wouldn't let it happen is because both states are incredibly important to the economic health of the united states. I secretly wish California would secede,...

      it's as if Texas or California wanted to cede from the union. We probably wouldn't let that happen, because last time a state tried to cede from the US it was kind of a disaster, and Texas in particular is "under dispute" as an American State in your fringier circles

      Eh, I think the real reason the US wouldn't let it happen is because both states are incredibly important to the economic health of the united states.

      I secretly wish California would secede, however, as I don't feel guilty about giving them my tax dollars, but I do feel guilty about giving money to the US government since they repeatedly choose to spend it in all the wrong places. That is of course, nothing to say about the policies our current president has been following or the mess that is our current national governmental system (a false pretense of checks and balances, the existence of the electoral college, a justice system which is political in nature, etc.)

      7 votes
      1. [2]
        moocow1452
        Link Parent
        That sounds nice, but seems like it would unleash at least a Brexit level catastrophe in the states when we already have a tremendous amount of things to deal with the whole subversion of...

        That sounds nice, but seems like it would unleash at least a Brexit level catastrophe in the states when we already have a tremendous amount of things to deal with the whole subversion of executive restraint. Granted, Brexit happened on principle to begin with, but it still seems kind of rash, especially since we fought a war the last time states left, and we still have baggage from that 160 years later.

        5 votes
        1. Gaywallet
          Link Parent
          Oh there's no question there'd be a lot of turmoil, instability, and issues caused by such a secession but frankly at this point I'm fed up with following the status quo because it's easy. I'm fed...

          Oh there's no question there'd be a lot of turmoil, instability, and issues caused by such a secession but frankly at this point I'm fed up with following the status quo because it's easy. I'm fed up with the US government rolling back civil rights, hopping into wars we don't need, doing generally embarrassing things, fucking up trade, rolling back environmental protection, and many other generally poor ideas. I don't want to give them my money anymore, but I'd be more than happy to give that same money to the Californian government because at least they have some goddamn common sense.

          4 votes
    3. [4]
      Sahasrahla
      Link Parent
      This is a point that's often brought up but I think it's not a great comparison. When the CCP's defenders (and not saying that's what you're trying to do!) bring this up it's often as a way to say...

      I guess from their point of view, it's as if Texas or California wanted to cede from the union.

      This is a point that's often brought up but I think it's not a great comparison. When the CCP's defenders (and not saying that's what you're trying to do!) bring this up it's often as a way to say "the West are such hypocrites, leave us alone because you wouldn't accept this either." But when I think of independence movements in "the West" I think of Quebec and Scotland which have both held one or two independence referendums and which both could hold another one if they wanted. There's also Catalonia, I suppose, but the actions of the Spanish government have been shameful on that and if there's political will for it the residents of that region deserve a referendum too.

      Even from an American perspective things are a bit murky. The last experience (and reference point) the US has with states leaving is the Civil War which is rather unique compared to what California or Texas trying to leave the union would look like today if there was a political will for it. Also, a state leaving isn't necessarily the best analogy. What about Puerto Rico? It's a more clear American example of "one country, two systems" and in fact they have had referendums about independence. Mostly Americans responded with ambivalence.

      Though, like other commenters have noted, independence is not one of the Five Demands of the protesters. It's an open question whether or not Hong Kongers would want independence if they felt it was feasible (i.e. if they thought Beijing wouldn't rather kill every last man, woman, and child in Hong Kong rather than accept their independence) but in any case it's not what the protesters are trying to achieve.

      5 votes
      1. [3]
        Leonidas
        Link Parent
        True, although Puerto Rico still isn't a perfect analogy because the people there have a different language and ethnic background than "most" Americans and aren't really seen as integral to the...

        What about Puerto Rico? It's a more clear American example of "one country, two systems" and in fact they have had referendums about independence. Mostly Americans responded with ambivalence.

        True, although Puerto Rico still isn't a perfect analogy because the people there have a different language and ethnic background than "most" Americans and aren't really seen as integral to the union from a territorial or economic standpoint. The neglect after Hurricane Maria is a chief example of that mindset. Hong Kong's status is a very difficult situation because it's pretty unique IMO.

        3 votes
        1. [2]
          Sahasrahla
          Link Parent
          It's not a perfect analogy sure, I just mean it's at least as good or better than the California/Texas independence comparison that's often made. Also, I feel the need to mention that Hong Kong...

          It's not a perfect analogy sure, I just mean it's at least as good or better than the California/Texas independence comparison that's often made. Also, I feel the need to mention that Hong Kong does have a different language. Cantonese and Mandarin are no more dialects of each other than Italian and French are. They're mutually unintelligible and even written Cantonese can be difficult or impossible to read for Mandarin speakers (owing to different grammar and idioms, etc.) despite using many of the same characters.

          But don't take my word for it. For a Hong Kong perspective some good sources are this article: Insurgent tongues: how loose Cantonese romanisation became Hong Kong’s patois of protest and if you have Netflix you might enjoy a segment of the Hong Kong film "Ten Years". It's a series of short stories about a near future where China asserts its control (it was made pre-protest, but is obviously prescient) and at the 48 minute mark is a story called "Dialect" on this topic. I won't spoil it, but if you have 10 minutes it's worth watching.

          Edit: And, on this topic, it's worth remembering to always take with a grain of salt any talk of how "homogeneous" China is. While there's truth to it there's also a lot of propaganda involved from a government trying to rule over and hold together a vast and diverse country.

          4 votes
          1. Leonidas
            Link Parent
            Ah, that's true. People often refer to the "Chinese" language, which completely ignores nuances like that.

            Ah, that's true. People often refer to the "Chinese" language, which completely ignores nuances like that.

            1 vote