8
votes
Weekly coronavirus-related chat, questions, and minor updates - week of February 28
This thread is posted weekly, and is intended as a place for more-casual discussion of the coronavirus and questions/updates that may not warrant their own dedicated topics. Tell us about what the situation is like where you live!
The Biden Administration Killed America’s Collective Pandemic Approach: Protections meant to shield everyone can’t be a matter of personal preference.
On a personal note, if you live in an area with high case rates and you have the resources to do so, please keep wearing masks in public, indoor spaces. High risk people's lives just got even smaller than they were before. I can't keep putting off dentist and doctor appointments much longer...
The CDC made a map, and they do ask everyone to wear a mask in the counties marked red. That's a call for collective action.
The Atlantic article doesn't acknowledge this. It doesn't seem to take into account changing conditions at all?
I think it's fair to say, though, that not many people are looking at the map. It hasn't been publicized much, and those of us who pay attention to cases are looking at other dashboards. Most people probably don't look at anything at all.
It's a problem because prevalence of COVID in a community is invisible. Unlike the weather, you can't look out the window to see if things look bad.
(Another problem is that it's apparently not a very good map?)
I don't know about healthy folks, but the chronic illness/disability community on Twitter knows about the map - it existed in various forms before with the old guidelines, and plenty of counties went from red to green after the switch in guidelines, which isn't very comforting.
Conditions are changing, sure, but they also changed the standards they use to assess those conditions, making things seem suddenly a lot better than they actually are (in terms of cases). And for those of us concerned about high risk individuals and people getting long COVID, community case rates are more important than hospitalizations.
The new guidelines prioritize healthy, vaccinated people, with the assumption that if they get sick it's fine (ignoring long COVID). Only recommending masks at the point of extremely high community spread isn't public health or collective action, because you ignored high risk and unvaccinated folks until that suddenly much higher threshold is met. Their new standard is to protect hospitals, and to protect healthy people from dying from a heart attack because the hospitals are full of high risk/unvaccinated folks; it doesn't appear to be meant to protect everyone, which is the point of the article.
I think this would be a persuasive argument: the omicron wave is ending, but not quite over. So why can't we take precautions for another couple of weeks? This should make cases drop enough that everyone, including high-risk individuals, can venture out safely.
At least, it's persuasive to me. But I don't think many people will listen to health authorities anyway at this point. As a result, unfortunately I think it's going to take longer to get there. But I think cases will still decline and hopefully we will still get there soon.
I guess that would have been an improvement, yeah.
But even with that, I don't really know what happens when the next variant comes along. The new guidelines are so weak and weighted to hospitalizations, that we'll be pretty far into the upswing by the time masking kicks in again.
I'm feeling pretty bleak about it all. Today I tried to find a new gynecologist, and the closest practice to me no longer requires masks, even though my county is red (on both the new map and the old map that still applies to healthcare settings).
An anti-vax judge is preventing the US Navy from deploying a warship
commanding officer of a $1.8 billion guided-missile destroyer refuses to get vaccinated, and refuses to even get tested when he has obvious covid symptoms:
and a federal judge (George HW Bush appointee) is prioritizing that commander's "religious liberty" over the Navy's desire to relieve him of command for insubordination and send the ship out commanded by someone who can follow orders.
there are 300 people on the ship (based on the description in the article, it's an Arleigh Burke class). the vast majority of them (97% of the Navy overall) are vaccinated. their commander is not. seems like that's probably bad for morale.
Looking at US covid statistics on the Washington Post page: the US overall is down 37% to 20 cases per 100k. The last time it was this low was July. New York dropped to 10 per 100k, also last seen there in July. Seems good!
In California the decline seems to have stalled at 34 per 100k (up 3%.) Is it a blip? What's going on here?
Looking at the California state dashboard clears this up somewhat. The difference seems to be "by report date" versus "by episode date". Going by report date, the numbers for California are steady (slight increase), but by episode date they are down.
However, data over the last seven days is incomplete, and the "by episode date" is going to slope downward regardless. The CA dashboard gives 19.5 cases per 100k as its top-line number, which seems to be the "by episode date" number from a week ago. The "by report date" average is at 30.3 cases per 100k, which is close to the Washington Post number.
It's rather confusing. We need better dashboards.
The county numbers in the Washington Post are even more confusing - it says there is a 109% increase in San Mateo County and 158% increase in Alameda, which would be alarming if true. This agrees with the "by report date" graph in the state dashboard, but there's no sign of any increase in the "by episode date" graph.
I can think of two possibilities: (1) reporting delays are the same as last week. Cases are steady in California due to being up a lot in Alameda and San Mateo, or (2) there has been more backfilling of older cases than usual in these counties over the last week, so the "reported by" graph is misleading.
There don't seem to be any news reports of an alarming increase in cases the local news for Alameda or San Mateo. But I'm no longer sure I know what happened in the past week in California.
Hong Kong to Lock Down City for Mass Testing, Sing Tao Says
[...]
Hong Kong population drop accelerates amid worst COVID outbreak
Hong Kong's Covid Death Rate Is Now One of the World's Highest
Hong Kong’s elderly vaccine refuseniks unmoved by soaring Covid deaths
[…]
140 million Americans have had coronavirus, according to blood tests analyzed by CDC
[...]
The Pandemic is following a very predictable and depressing pattern: As with diseases such as malaria and HIV, rich countries are “moving on” from COVID while poor ones continue to get ravaged.
No, that's not what "pandemic" or "epidemic" mean. These are scientific terms. Putting it in bold doesn't make a bad argument better.
Another problem with this article is that it points to lifting restrictions in rich countries as if this were somehow connected to international aid. These are different things, separate campaigns. Surely, public health decisions should be based on local conditions. Wearing masks in solidarity with Africa, when the danger has largely passed, would not help them.
A quick search seems to show that international aid continues. From two weeks ago:
U.S. will ‘surge’ vaccine support to 11 African countries
The world's attention has turned to Ukraine, but fortunately governments can do more than one thing.
At the individual level, I recommend Against Malaria, or look at GiveWell's other recommendations.