10 votes

There has not been a single instance of a child under ten transmitting the coronavirus, even in contact tracing carried out by WHO

2 comments

  1. rkcr
    Link
    I hope this is backed up with more evidence soon. If those of us with young kids could just let them play with each other that would be a huge load off our shoulders. It's been hard being the only...

    I hope this is backed up with more evidence soon. If those of us with young kids could just let them play with each other that would be a huge load off our shoulders. It's been hard being the only social contact with my kid for the past month+.

    10 votes
  2. [2]
    Comment deleted by author
    Link
    1. cfabbro
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      Yeah, when the Telegraph and Daily Mail are the top two results in google when you try to look for a better source, that's a giant red flag. The only other related articles I could find were...

      Yeah, when the Telegraph and Daily Mail are the top two results in google when you try to look for a better source, that's a giant red flag. The only other related articles I could find were regarding a similar statement made by the Swiss health ministry's infectious diseases chief, E.g. from the BBC:

      Coronavirus: Switzerland says young children can hug grandparents

      "Young children are not infected and do not transmit the virus," he said. "They just don't have the receptors to catch the disease."

      However in the same article there is also this quote too:

      Sounding a note of caution, Germany's chief virologist Christian Drosten told Austrian broadcaster ORF that there was insufficient data to say conclusively that young children could not transmit the virus.

      3 votes