10 votes

Children growing up after this crisis will use far more oral language after it ends

3 comments

  1. [2]
    NaraVara
    Link
    Maybe, but I doubt it’ll be because of their language choices. People were writing about this when I was a kid when chat rooms and instant messaging first got popular. People observed that writing...

    If we are seeing the beginning of what will be referred to in 10 or 15 years as a “corona generation” of kids hobbled by months-long stretches of online school, then I take the risk of predicting that—along with pedants angry that people aren’t calling it a “COVID generation”

    Maybe, but I doubt it’ll be because of their language choices. People were writing about this when I was a kid when chat rooms and instant messaging first got popular. People observed that writing was getting more casual, informal, slang laden, etc. They speculated that the millennial generation would be stunted writers as a result.

    It didn’t really come to pass. I’m sure stuff changed and evolution happened, but so much else happened besides AIM and ICQ that it’s hard to point at them specifically. If anything killed this generation’s ability to be great writers it’s the fact that the economy around writing for a living has collapsed to where only low-effort clickbait pays any bills.

    In terms of everyday writing habits from normal people, the main issue I see is a tendency to digress and intersperse side-thoughts, tangents, interstitial rambling asides, etc. But I blame this more on bad, unfocused thinkers having more ability to publish without proofreading. It’s a matter of who has access to publish more than a stylistic change in writing choices.

    8 votes
    1. [2]
      Comment deleted by author
      Link Parent
      1. NaraVara
        Link Parent
        I don’t think we can rule out all the other factors leading to this. There have been plenty of meandering newsletters and “publications” in the past. Just read some vintage letters to the editors...

        That constant exposure lends us to the attributes you listed because the mode of communication encourages it.

        I don’t think we can rule out all the other factors leading to this. There have been plenty of meandering newsletters and “publications” in the past. Just read some vintage letters to the editors in indie zines or the label on any bottle of Dr. Bronner’s soap. I don’t know how much of this is IMing vs. just worse writers having platforms without any editors.

        I also think the college admissions-prep complex can’t possibly be helping. From the extremely restrictive 5-paragraph essay structure we drill into kids’ heads to the lame standardized testing focus in K-12 education, it’s all absolutely toxic to teaching kids to learn how to write or how to enjoy it. Most standardized tests don’t even look for being able to make a coherent argument, they literally just want you to do the intro with 3 topics, 3 paragraphs, and conclusion regardless of whether anything you say makes sense or follows logically from the premises.

        8 votes
  2. Kuromantis
    (edited )
    Link
    Bruh. On a more serious note though:

    The data are in.

    I take the risk of predicting that—along with pedants angry that people aren’t calling it a “COVID generation”

    Bruh.

    On a more serious note though:

    One effect that this crisis may well have on American language is to bolster the longevity of its diversity. In this country, currently about one in four children live in homes with a language other than English as the main language. Yet, the sad truth is that these languages tend not to make it far past that home unless there are massive communities of people living in that language, which is true of just a few such as Spanish and Mandarin, or in more isolated communities, Yiddish and German.

    Often, children in bilingual homes learn their parents’ and grandparents’ language to a functional but abbreviated degree. They can converse fluently on a basic level, but never master the level of language required to discuss complex topics and miss many of the pickier aspects of the language’s grammar. Linguists call this “heritage language.” People who speak a language only at this level seldom pass it on to their children, even if they happen to marry someone who also speaks the language on the same level.

    Children whose Bengali or Danish was slipping have now been spending infinitely more time with parents (and especially in immigrant communities, grandparents) and have been able to use the home language all day every day for the first time since toddlerhood. I have heard from many parents who say that they are pleased to see their children’s skills in the home language explode or at least improve. A summer immersed in a language can do wonders, as veterans of Middlebury College’s famous language-learning program can attest. The lockdown is clearly going to amount to the equivalent of about two summers, and there are mini-Middleburys happening in millions of houses worldwide.

    Many will be less sanguine about another possible legacy of the virus. If this kind of lockdown becomes necessary in waves until there is a vaccine, and especially if other pandemics arrive in the near-future and mean again separating children from formal schooling for months at a time, the ever-increasing oralization of American language use will be entrenched even more deeply than before.

    At home one learns to talk; at school is where one learns to speak, especially those from less educated homes. At home one writes stuff down here and there; at school one learns to compose the kind of text that presents you to the world as a serious person. Humans are genetically programmed to talk, and ordinary talk is complex and nuanced indeed. Yet modern civilization exerts a requirement that citizens master a secondary layer of communication, the formal one.

    I take the risk of predicting that—along with pedants angry that people aren’t calling it a “COVID generation”—we will see the National Assessment of Educational Progress scores go down. It will first become evident with the round of fourth-graders tested next year.

    Already we have seen a transition from an era of long emails as common coin in the 1990s to brief texts as the norm starting in about 2005, such that even many people who were comfortable with long emails then today prefer the brevity of texts, while people under about 25 often find not just email but Facebook too wordy. The terseness of texting and Instagram rule now: As always, formal language is a stunt, not a natural condition.

    5 votes