9
votes
Tesla Board of Directors are now considering taking Tesla private at the request of Elon Musk
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- If you invested $1,000 in Tesla in 2010, here's how much you'd have now
- Authors
- Shawn M. Carter, Emmie Martin
- Published
- Aug 8 2018
- Word count
- 449 words
Here is one part of the entire deal that does not make to me:
Musk said that he did not want to force anyone to sell, and hoped that all current investors would stay. If all current investors stay then there would be no sale to go private, correct?
edit: I guess he might mean that TSLA shareholders could vote to go private, and keep their shares via a scheme similar to the way SpaceX employees own the company? This would also keep the buyout price much lower, correct?
So much of this doesn't make sense to me. This article on Axios earlier today does a pretty good job going over some of the interesting parts of it. And apparently the SEC is looking into it now.
Here is another CNBC piece along similar lines to the Axios article.
Elon set the target price for privatization at $420 a share and the company would be valued at $71.6 billion.
Complete speculation on my part, but Tesla would also do better during a stock market downturn if it was privately held, correct?
Given that the stock market is explicitly made up of publicly traded companies, yes. But also, a drop in the valuation of a stock only matters to a company when they want to sell more shares to gain cash. If a company is doing well internally and they don't want more liquidity nothing the stock market does will really change their success.
Given Telsa's aims of dominating multiple markets: EVs, stationary storage, solar generation, I assume that they would like to raise money at some point in the future.
Possibly, but theorizing about the specific success of Tesla's future endeavors as related to their private or public ownership is shaky.