I'd point out that sometimes news organizations will delay reporting in order to give government agencies, particularly intelligence and military groups, time to address their own concerns...
I'd point out that sometimes news organizations will delay reporting in order to give government agencies, particularly intelligence and military groups, time to address their own concerns internally. For example, the Guardian releasing more source info or photographic evidence may out intelligence officers that would rather remain incognito. I'm not saying that IS what is occurring, but it's certainly plausible.
Greenwald is a wikileaks asset. That he doesn't immediately begin this argument by disclosing his deep ties to them and his history of defending them is very telling.
Greenwald is a wikileaks asset. That he doesn't immediately begin this argument by disclosing his deep ties to them and his history of defending them is very telling.
I'd point out that sometimes news organizations will delay reporting in order to give government agencies, particularly intelligence and military groups, time to address their own concerns internally. For example, the Guardian releasing more source info or photographic evidence may out intelligence officers that would rather remain incognito. I'm not saying that IS what is occurring, but it's certainly plausible.
Greenwald is a wikileaks asset. That he doesn't immediately begin this argument by disclosing his deep ties to them and his history of defending them is very telling.