25
votes
An RV exploded in Nashville, TN around 6:30 today - police suspect it was intentional
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- RV that exploded in Nashville broadcast a message warning of imminent blast, police say
- Published
- Dec 25 2020
- Word count
- 1102 words
Interesting speculation in this tweet thread from a professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1342552291145117697.html
The IRA did this a lot. I suspect that because telephones are more easily tracked these days, the loudspeaker was easier to use.
As far as motivation, my “hot take” is that the bombing is just a distraction, for variously either a cyber operation, a heist, or a murder.
The only thing I could frame it as is that the individual would try to use this as a way to get out of trouble when ultimately apprehended to try to dodge any claims they intended to harm civilians.
This is pretty wild to see on Christmas day. It's already been such a hard year, but no confirmed fatalities yet, which is a bit of a silver lining. My heart goes out to Nashville today.
Girlfriend warned Nashville police Anthony Warner was building bomb a year ago, report shows
..
...
The police reported up, and the FBI and DoD didn't have anything on Warner. Then,
Based on this article, it sounds to me like the police were doing their due diligence and took the threats seriously.
Then, for an unknown reason, the attorney blocked them from doing anything further.(Pointed out by @RapidEyeMovement: not unknown. I thought I hit the bottom of the article, but there was more to read.)Edit:
I want to add that this doesn't seem like terrorism cases where the government was alerted and failed to intervene. Here, it sounds like they tried, were blocked from doing anything by the attorney, and then this happened. I'm speculating now, but perhaps the FBI was monitoring any online presence? Trying to find a valid reason to search the property? I mean, I don't know how a threat of bomb making doesn't get a warrant, but I'm not a legal professional. Or, perhaps the police failed here because, according to the article:
and then they failed to do any more significant action on the premise that the claims couldn't be substantiated further? These are all questions that will hopefully be answered by official channels, but are again, all speculation.
I am with you on most of this, but this last part.
Throckmorton, the Attorney, basically says that they are full of shit with his response and he gives his reason why they are full of shit. It is couched in Attorney speak, but that is what he is saying. Besides at this point he was acting as the Girlfriend Attorney not the Warner and had no legal right to intervene on Warner behalf