Norway v England Discussion 793 CE. 8 June. Longships are sighted off the coast of Northumbria. The monks greet the Norse crew with a friendly 'alright mate?' The greeting is returned in a way...
Norway v England Discussion
793 CE. 8 June. Longships are sighted off the coast of Northumbria. The monks greet the Norse crew with a friendly 'alright mate?' The greeting is returned in a way that the monks will later describe as 'not very sporting, actually.'
History will never be the same. But will it repeat itself in Miami?
No. The Norwegian team are not seasonal farmers who raid due to economic forces, and the English team do not seem to be particularly pious or cloistered away copying out manuscripts.
I fell asleep right as the NORvENG game was starting. Then I woke up at the half of extra time. Those Norwegians looked TIRED in the last ~10min. At least compared to the the English. I get...
I fell asleep right as the NORvENG game was starting. Then I woke up at the half of extra time. Those Norwegians looked TIRED in the last ~10min. At least compared to the the English. I get they're playing 90+ min of soccer, in hot and humid-ass Miami. But it's the World Cup.
Also, that post-match interview with Tuchel was something else. His team won yet he was not particularly happy! Though the tournament is over yet, so perhaps it makes sense to still be "on."
I think it was tough for Tuchel because Norway really, really fell apart, especially in the last ten minutes of regular time. It was like watching two different teams. The first half and first...
I think it was tough for Tuchel because Norway really, really fell apart, especially in the last ten minutes of regular time. It was like watching two different teams.
The first half and first play session of the second Norway were really coming to life and just putting a lot of pressure on England in the goals. I think they had something like 12 shots on goal with 6 of them on target. Pickford was only just getting to Norway's shots to deflect them, and then suddenly Nyland was put under serious pressure in the last ten mins. He played amazingly.
Norway couldn't find a way in extra time to put any offensive pressure on. Braut Haaland looked absolutely wrecked even towards the end of the first half, to the point where we were wondering if it was to try and lull England into a false sense of security. But he was just absolutely destroyed, whether by humidity (40 apparenty temperature!) or some other issue.
Schjelderup's cross-that-turned-into-a-goal was amazing. Djed Spence played incredibly, and Jude Bellingham was able to be creative and create opportunities where Ødegaard really struggled.
A great match that unfortunately fizzled out at the end. Very happy my team made it this far, and it is a shame, as I think Argentina and Switzerland are both much weaker teams than England. But that is the luck of the draw!
This ended up being a re-run of Stamford Bridge instead of Lindisfarne, but it very much seems as Norway has not only had an extremely successful return to the Cup, but brought a lot of joy to people around the world. That is a nice consolation.
Currently in CEST compared to BST so this game has gone from late but comfortable to pushing it a bit. Though that's mainly with rumours that it may be delayed due to weather like England's...
Currently in CEST compared to BST so this game has gone from late but comfortable to pushing it a bit. Though that's mainly with rumours that it may be delayed due to weather like England's previous game with Mexico.
This has been my favourite Norsemen/English rematch post I've seen, but there are so many. I'm really looking forward to this game. Apart from regional loyalties, as @pxl pointed out, there's good...
I'm really looking forward to this game. Apart from regional loyalties, as @pxl pointed out, there's good football history between the two teams.
As much as I enjoy jokingly teasing England fans, I think the result either way would be very impressive. Norway for proving themselves to be a fully cohesive team and not just the Haaland show, and England living up to fan expecations of a well-developed and gritty side.
A colleague yesterday said about Norway 'our boys are not used to playing in the humidity', which reminded me of this very famous clip from an Arsenal fan
On the whole controversy over Norway's goal being taken away: Haaland definitely pushed the dude in a way that gave them an unfair advantage. Anderson might have been able to hold his ground if he...
On the whole controversy over Norway's goal being taken away: Haaland definitely pushed the dude in a way that gave them an unfair advantage. Anderson might have been able to hold his ground if he really wanted to, but he would've stumbled backwards pretty hard. The call to redo the corner I think was fair. In any case, FIFA needs to get its act together on contact in general. If the rules aren't airtight, then even teams that don't want to play dirty will have to play a little dirty eventually, lest they be at a disadvantage.
I'm of course rooting for England, but not just because I'm an Englishman. Hopefully us winning the World Cup will finally put It's Coming Home to rest. It's a "we haven't won in 30+ years, woe is...
I'm of course rooting for England, but not just because I'm an Englishman. Hopefully us winning the World Cup will finally put It's Coming Home to rest.
It's a "we haven't won in 30+ years, woe is me" football song.
Haaland will be a huge fucking problem though. He single-handedly carried Manchester City to multiple Premier League trophies...
Weirdly though the song was originally released for Euro 96 since we were hosting. I think they updated it for France 98 to be a bit more World Cup. As much as it gets over done, I don't think...
Weirdly though the song was originally released for Euro 96 since we were hosting.
I think they updated it for France 98 to be a bit more World Cup.
As much as it gets over done, I don't think even winning either the world cup or euros will stop chants of "it's coming home" each time they roll around.
Personally for England football songs I'm more partial to Vindaloo...
I think even lots of non-English people know 'It's Coming Home' from last World Cup. That and Three Lions were written by David Baddiel and Frank Skinner, who both have a lot to answer for. I'm...
I think even lots of non-English people know 'It's Coming Home' from last World Cup. That and Three Lions were written by David Baddiel and Frank Skinner, who both have a lot to answer for.
I'm referring to the songs primarily, but Baddiel didn't really try on UK Taskmaster. It's okay to play a grumpy old man character, but you have to put in a little bit of effort.
Baddiel also has a troubling past with regard to racism. His obsession with anti semitism seems to have led him to deny other forms of racism have relevance, and thus to exhibit it shamelessly,...
His obsession with anti semitism seems to have led him to deny other forms of racism have relevance, and thus to exhibit it shamelessly, frequently, and targetedly, on national TV.
The Final - Spain vs Argentina Spain relies on discipline and ball control, with each player slotting into a well planned system. Argentina's game this tournament has been much more uneven, but...
The Final - Spain vs Argentina
Spain relies on discipline and ball control, with each player slotting into a well planned system.
Argentina's game this tournament has been much more uneven, but also much more exciting, with young players taking advantage of the opportunities Messi is able to create, from gaps other players can't see or pass to.
Stat of the tournament: Spain have only been scored on once in the tournament, in the quarterfinal against Belgium.
Personally, I'm going for Spain because the young Argentines pulled that Las Malvinas shit after the England game. I am not a 'no politics in sport' person, as sport is inherently political. But I am very firmly 'no far-right nationalist politics in sport', and as Fifa will not do anything, I can at least lend my support to the Spanish squad.
There've been a lot of funny memes of South American fans sadly resigning themselves to support their colonizer over the Argentines. I knew Argentina (as a side, and their fans) was disliked within and without South America, but not to this extent!
I'm hoping for 2-0 Spain but my predictions have been wrong all tournament
I predict a game with many fouls, at least two red cards and lots of complaining. Messi will tragically miss a penalty. Spain will be the dominant team in a mediocre game that'll end Spain 1,...
I predict a game with many fouls, at least two red cards and lots of complaining. Messi will tragically miss a penalty. Spain will be the dominant team in a mediocre game that'll end Spain 1, Argentina 0, ¡ole!
Well, (e: just saw that 'Phisticuffs' Paredes got red after the game, so it's been actually two red cards) and Messi wasn't really doing much this game, but the rest was kinda on point. 🙃 Spain...
Well, only one red card (e: just saw that 'Phisticuffs' Paredes got red after the game, so it's been actually two red cards) and Messi wasn't really doing much this game, but the rest was kinda on point. 🙃
Spain deserved this, I think. Argentina just couldn't create chances against them.
I'm interested to see what the reaction in Argentina will be to Messi's performance in this final, and how it affects his legacy long-term. After having gone from blaming him for so long and so...
I'm interested to see what the reaction in Argentina will be to Messi's performance in this final, and how it affects his legacy long-term. After having gone from blaming him for so long and so much that he retired, to loving him after he finally won in Qatar, how will they frame him basically going missing today?
Personally, I think he is quite probably the best footballer to ever set foot on a pitch, but there have undoubtedly been big occasions where you'd want him to drag everyone over the line and he's just been conspicuously... meek. Which is not to say that he's never done it, but I don't think it's an unfair criticism when comparing him to the other legends of the game.
Yeah, but when top players like Messi, Ronaldo, Haaland, etc. have to play against two or three world class defenders even they will have a hard time. Often these players still manage to create...
Yeah, but when top players like Messi, Ronaldo, Haaland, etc. have to play against two or three world class defenders even they will have a hard time. Often these players still manage to create opportunities out of nothing, but the Spain defense is probably the best in the world, Messi is 39 and it's also clear that Spain would try to take him out of the game since Argentinas whole playstyle depends heavily on him. It's understandable that he couldn't messi his way out of this.
I would hope that in the longterm Argentinians are just happy that they had one of the best players ever in their team (if not the best). They'd be incredibly ungrateful if they'd criticise Messi for not winning the final when he was the only reason why their team made it so far in the first place (not to mention all the other titles he helped to win for them).
Eh, from my outsiders perspective, he didn't do a lot today but neither did anyone for Argentina except Martinez. He deserves Man of the Match, cause there is no way Argentina makes it to extra...
Eh, from my outsiders perspective, he didn't do a lot today but neither did anyone for Argentina except Martinez. He deserves Man of the Match, cause there is no way Argentina makes it to extra time without him.
Haha, yeah, after this prediction it's probably going to be an awesome and super fair game with a 2:2 after 90 minutes and Argentina winning the penalty shoot-out. Messi scores three times. 🙂
Haha, yeah, after this prediction it's probably going to be an awesome and super fair game with a 2:2 after 90 minutes and Argentina winning the penalty shoot-out. Messi scores three times. 🙂
What an incredible game!!! The stat of the match has to be Argentina having zero shots on goal in regular time to Spain's 16. 762 Spanish passes completed to Argentina's 357. I'm not normally a...
What an incredible game!!!
The stat of the match has to be Argentina having zero shots on goal in regular time to Spain's 16. 762 Spanish passes completed to Argentina's 357.
I'm not normally a stats person, but I think if a person saw a 1-0 score after extra time it doesn't show how dominant Spain were for the entire match.
What happened post game? The sportsmanship from Argentina has really been earning them the "anyone but them" thing but I couldn't watch the match today so not sure what they did
What happened post game? The sportsmanship from Argentina has really been earning them the "anyone but them" thing but I couldn't watch the match today so not sure what they did
On and off the pitch. Sometimes a few names pop up regularly and that's often an indication they're playing well. In the case of Paredes it just meant he kicked someone in the shins again....
On and off the pitch. Sometimes a few names pop up regularly and that's often an indication they're playing well. In the case of Paredes it just meant he kicked someone in the shins again. Absolutely dismal display of sportsmanship by most of Argentina. Even more than any other game in this cup so far.
I'm certain Spanish players were instructed not to let it get to them. They kept cool and played a (mostly) clean match.
It was interesting seeing how different these two teams were. I only really started watching the WC this past week. Other than watching a couple US matches and the England vs Norway quarterfinal...
It was interesting seeing how different these two teams were. I only really started watching the WC this past week. Other than watching a couple US matches and the England vs Norway quarterfinal (well...the last 10min or so). So it's not like I saw Spain nor Argentina before this past week. But I kept hearing how if Spain gets to the end, and if Argentina does as well, they'll destroy Argentina. But then I thought, "Yeah, but that's what people said about some of these other match ups and they didn't seem to pan out. And this is Argentina. Plus Messi (even if he is old* now)."
But nah, this time it was true. Spain seemed to be on a different level than Argentina. So much more coordinated and confident. They pretty much controlled that game from the start. I think only at the end when Argentina was getting a little (lot) desperate, was I thinking, "Uh oh, Spain better keep it together." Which they managed to do.
Congrats to Spain! Good guys definitely won. Without really having a lot of background about Argentina...yeah...I see why they have the reputation they do.
*I call him old...him and I are like the same age 😭
Thanks for the correction, it does appear that nationalism around the Falklands goes across the political spectrum in Argentina. I read a few papers on it and it seems like all parties can't...
Thanks for the correction, it does appear that nationalism around the Falklands goes across the political spectrum in Argentina. I read a few papers on it and it seems like all parties can't animate voters without invoking the issue. The fact that it's written on buses does not make it any less strange to me, but I'm viewing this from a different continent
I was just reposting a silly joke that made me laugh. I will freely admit that I do not understand why this issue is the issue that powers Argentine nationalism and identity, even after reading...
I was just reposting a silly joke that made me laugh. I will freely admit that I do not understand why this issue is the issue that powers Argentine nationalism and identity, even after reading about it for a few hours.
I will leave who physically possesses the islands to the UN, or, more likely, military might. But spiritually they currently belong to Yamal and Fernan Torres, at least for the next few months. (/S in case it was needed)
The current residents voted with like 90% turnout and only 3 people voted to join Argentina. It's not super populated but I think it's a low enough percentage to leave things where they are....
The current residents voted with like 90% turnout and only 3 people voted to join Argentina. It's not super populated but I think it's a low enough percentage to leave things where they are.
Probably. I'm not an expert and perhaps there's a flaw in my thoughts
Argentina v Switzerland Discussion After accusations of pro-Argentine refereeing in the quarterfinals against Egypt, Messi's team (who have no control over that unless you've got specific...
Argentina v Switzerland Discussion
After accusations of pro-Argentine refereeing in the quarterfinals against Egypt, Messi's team (who have no control over that unless you've got specific knowledge of FIFA corruption to say otherwise) look set to take on the plucky cowherds and bankers* of Europe's most famous alpine fortress.
*That bit was a joke, they are professional football players.
Will Messi add to his current golden boot tally of 8? Will the Swiss pay back the lack off respect their team has been accorded with CAREFULLY CALCULATED DAILY BUT INVOICED MONTHLY INTEREST?
FIND OUT, IN KANSAS CITY! WHICH IS IN MISSOURI! FOR SOME REASON!
Thanks for subscribing to America Facts™! It's in both (two separate cities across the border from each other), the good one is just in Missouri. It's named after the Kansas river which is named...
Thanks for subscribing to America Facts™!
It's in both (two separate cities across the border from each other), the good one is just in Missouri. It's named after the Kansas river which is named after the Kanza people and Kansas, Missouri became Kansas City, Missouri later to avoid confusion with the State of Kansas.
Kansas City, Kansas was trying to steal the aura of KCMO.
Kansas City, Kansas is also stealing the stadium location of the Kansas City Chiefs, who currently play their games in Kansas City, Missouri. Which, when it comes to American football stadium...
Kansas City, Kansas is also stealing the stadium location of the Kansas City Chiefs, who currently play their games in Kansas City, Missouri. Which, when it comes to American football stadium theft, isn't as bad as what happened to San Francisco (Santa Clara), New York (East Rutherford, New Jersey), Chicago (Hammond, Indiana), or Oakland (Las Vegas, Nevada).
America Facts™ When someone cuts in on your business, you get to sue them! Or, depending on your cultural tradition and said culture's history of organized crime call some of the "family" down...
America Facts™
When someone cuts in on your business, you get to sue them! Or, depending on your cultural tradition and said culture's history of organized crime call some of the "family" down from Chicago to handle a few things. Sure would be bad if something were to happen to that shiny new logo you got going on there...
/Kidding of course, please continue America Facts, Sports Edition and send me a quarter each time.
I personally would love more American anthropology as the tournament goes on. As the final will be held in the lands of the King of Kings Zohran Mamdani (but not really, the stadium is in New...
I personally would love more American anthropology as the tournament goes on. As the final will be held in the lands of the King of Kings Zohran Mamdani (but not really, the stadium is in New Jersey I think), us outsiders will need to know the proper gifts and tributes to bring to this mighty tyrant.
France and Spain are playing their final in Arlington (??? the cementary in sad war movies?), and the winners of Norway-England and Argentina-Switzerland will be playing in the fabled city of Atlanta (home of the historic texts of the golden age of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, for presumably tax reasons).
Please let us know if there's a Patreon for America Facts™!
Mayor Mamdani ( his first name is Mayor) can be appeased by just being good people to each other and celebrating the great city of New York.... Which as you noted you won't technically be in....
I personally would love more American anthropology as the tournament goes on. As the final will be held in the lands of the King of Kings Zohran Mamdani (but not really, the stadium is in New Jersey I think), us outsiders will need to know the proper gifts and tributes to bring to this mighty tyrant.
Mayor Mamdani ( his first name is Mayor) can be appeased by just being good people to each other and celebrating the great city of New York.... Which as you noted you won't technically be in. Which is fine! This stadium was the Ur example of "you cannot walk to the Men's World Cup venues" on Tiktok. Don't do it. It's technically probably possible. You might die. Don't do it.
America Fact ™
All of these stadiums are normally branded, going by entirely different names during the Men's World Cup thanks to FIFA being really opposed to advertising that it can't get a cut of. The New York New Jersey Stadium is not a thing otherwise but you're not allowed to know its true name. Much like a fae.
France and Spain are playing their final in Arlington (??? the cementary in sad war movies?),
Arlington, Texas isn't the same as Arlington, Virginia where the National cemetery is. Arlington Texas is named for the home of Robert E Lee, the traitor. (So was the other Arlington.) Said home in Virginia was where the cemetery is today. Why name a city in Texas after a traitor's house in Virginia? This is some US civil war stuff. Slavery was involved. Better not to think about it.
America Fact™
Texas is real big, about twice the size of Germany and bigger than Ukraine. But their "don't mess with Texas" slogan is really just an anti-littering campaign. They kind of let it go to their heads. We mostly ignore them.
playing in the fabled city of Atlanta (home of the historic texts of the golden age of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, for presumably tax reasons).
Atlanta's film industry peaked in 2022 but has been declining for the past few years. Probably due to the general issues in the industry more than ATL itself.
America Fact™ there are more than 70 streets with "Peachtree" in the name in Atlanta making navigating a pain in the ass. The state of Georgia, not the country, is known for its peaches. And despite the name there's no relation between the state and country. I don't hang out in the south so I don't know a bunch more.
Please let us know if there's a Patreon for America Facts™!
I know that the US loves fireworks, especially for 4th July, but I was surprised to see footage with homemade fireworks cannon versus water cannon during a protest in Georgia. I didn’t think there...
The state of Georgia, not the country
I know that the US loves fireworks, especially for 4th July, but I was surprised to see footage with homemade fireworks cannon versus water cannon during a protest in Georgia. I didn’t think there was enough civil unrest, or at least not the right kind of civil unrest, for something like that.
But turns out the footage I was seeing was from the other Georgia over on that other continent, not the peaches Georgia. And also it turns out I’ve probably made similar mistakes whenever Georgia (either) makes the news, likely for years if not decades.
Ah yeah I cannot assist in Georgia (country) facts™ as I don't own that Trademark. Generally speaking Peaches Georgia is urbanly wealthy and rurally poor with Atlanta becoming a particularly...
Ah yeah I cannot assist in Georgia (country) facts™ as I don't own that Trademark.
Generally speaking Peaches Georgia is urbanly wealthy and rurally poor with Atlanta becoming a particularly culturally relevant city.
What an odd game. I think at this stage it's fair to say that despite wins, and getting this far, Argentina have underperformed as their wins have not been dominant or convincing. This match was...
What an odd game.
I think at this stage it's fair to say that despite wins, and getting this far, Argentina have underperformed as their wins have not been dominant or convincing.
Hey all, As I haven't seen one yet, and because I really appreciate @JCPPhoenix's F1 weekly discussion threads, I'm making one for the latter stages of the 2026 Fifa World Cup. I would say that as...
Hey all,
As I haven't seen one yet, and because I really appreciate @JCPPhoenix's F1 weekly discussion threads, I'm making one for the latter stages of the 2026 Fifa World Cup.
I would say that as the thread creator, some of the best discussion and laughs from this World Cup where many crazy things has happened is through memes. So although Tildes doesn't allow memes or image macros or reels or TikToks as top level comments, perhaps I'll make a discussion/meme top level comment for each match and hopefully we can get a little slack to be silly.
As of the date this thread is posted, we have the following countries remaining:
I've made the top level comment the Wikipedia article that's tracking the tournament, as that's been the best way to keep track for me. As to where to where to watch and match times in your own local location, FIFA's official website has been useful, even if the organisation as a whole has not during this tournament.
France v Spain Discussion - Semifinal 1 With only the Pyrenees holding these two Western European titans back at all times, the gloves will be off tomorrow. Unless you are a goalkeeper, then...
France v Spain Discussion - Semifinal 1
With only the Pyrenees holding these two Western European titans back at all times, the gloves will be off tomorrow. Unless you are a goalkeeper, then gloves are allowed and just fine.
France's attack has been amazing throughout the tournament. As has their defensive play. As has their coaching. However, Spain has a racist ex-prime minister on their side, so it's anybody's game!
THAT WILL BE PLAYED. IN ARLINGTON, TEXAS. NOT THE CEMETARY WITH THE TROOPS, NOR THE ADJOINING TOWN IN VIRGINIA!
Semi final form for the two teams went in Spain's favor two years ago, so they'll be hoping to repeat that. France will obviously be wanting to correct that and reach their third consecutive final.
Semi final form for the two teams went in Spain's favor two years ago, so they'll be hoping to repeat that. France will obviously be wanting to correct that and reach their third consecutive final.
Spain absolutely shut the French down. They were so disciplined with their marking and every promising French service pass had a Spanish player to intercept it. Third straight year that Spain has...
Spain absolutely shut the French down. They were so disciplined with their marking and every promising French service pass had a Spanish player to intercept it.
Third straight year that Spain has beaten France in a semi - Euro 24, EUFA Nations 25, and now the World Cup.
Goal number one was an impressively tactical penalty. I don't respect it, but it was well done. Goal number 2 was just flat out very impressive.
Spain is on to the final. I find it hard to muster enthusiasm, as @culturedleftfoot said, they are a team without world class players but it's working out for them very well. Champion team beats team of champions etc etc
Edit: Mbappe gave an interview about his assessment of the game, which is refreshingly frank:
"We didn't play the match we wanted to, neither tactically, nor technically, nor in terms of our overall performance. When you don't do what you need to do in a World Cup semifinal, you don't win. Spain stayed true to their game plan, which is what defines them: a team that likes to control the ball and the pace of the match. The idea was to press them high up to keep them from settling into that deceptive rhythm, but we couldn't manage it. We made a lot of technical errors, we didn't know how to hurt them when we should have.
"What were we missing? We let them set the pace. It was up to us to change the balance, and that's where we failed. From the start, with how we pressed, we failed. We were always outnumbered 3 vs 2 in midfield. And against Spain, that's already tough. Fabián and Rodri had plenty of time to play. There was a lack of communication in the press. We needed to go 1 vs 1 in the press, force them to run with us because they're a team that doesn't like to run without the ball. The problem was also that, even when we recovered the ball, our first touches and first passes weren't up to World Cup semifinal level. When you add this up, the result is defeat."
I think that's a weird framing? Spain has a team that consists of world class players. They have no big single players like Messi or Haaland, but that doesn't mean that their team is not absolute...
they are a team without world class players
I think that's a weird framing? Spain has a team that consists of world class players.
They have no big single players like Messi or Haaland, but that doesn't mean that their team is not absolute world class.
That's what I interpreted the comment to mean, yes. By playing in the World Cup, they're obviously world-class players by definition. I didn't mean the team that is favoured to win the World Cup...
That's what I interpreted the comment to mean, yes.
By playing in the World Cup, they're obviously world-class players by definition. I didn't mean the team that is favoured to win the World Cup is shit.
I meant (and thought the original comment meant) they're not a team with multiple superstars. Their game isn't centred around an Mbappe/Messi/Haaland/Bellingham like figure - no star striker or magical midfielder.
Today's game was another Spanish game where no single player was being fed the ball or created all attacking drives from the midfield, and their win was methodical and disciplined. It's a very different style of football than relying on one lynchpin to make something happen in the attacking half of the field.
Just to re-iterate again, I don't think the team going to the final isn't world class. But if you were picking an ultimate team before the 2026 WC started, I don't imagine many people would have picked Rodri or Oyarzabal back in June.
England v Argentina Discussion - Semifinal 2 The football history between these two runs deep, with the Hand of God being brought up in every discussion of ENG v ARG, including this one. The...
England v Argentina Discussion - Semifinal 2
The football history between these two runs deep, with the Hand of God being brought up in every discussion of ENG v ARG, including this one.
The history-history is unusually passionate, with the Falklands/Las Malvinas debate still animating figures on the right wing of politics in both countries.
Both teams have had uneven performances throughout the tournament and have struggled against theoretically 'lesser' teams. The Spain that just shut down France would beat the England who went to extra time against Norway, and the Argentina that struggled with Switzerland.
But that's getting ahead of tomorrow's game - let's hope it's a good one!
AND IT'S HAPPENING IN ATLANTA WHICH I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT EXCEPT FOR DONALD GLOVER MADE A TV SHOW ABOUT IT!
The second half was the real difference maker. The spark Argentina showed, especially in the last 30 minutes, seemed impossible to stop. England were on the back foot for too long, and Messi...
The second half was the real difference maker. The spark Argentina showed, especially in the last 30 minutes, seemed impossible to stop. England were on the back foot for too long, and Messi looked ten years younger as he just created multiple opportunities.
Mac Allister got very unlucky hitting both posts with such force. I really dislike Fernandez for his history of racism and homophobia, so it was sad to see his goal break the walls of the dam.
I think England played well and I hope they don't face too much criticism when they get home. It looked like they were doing their best to stick to Tuchel's game plan, that game plan just appeared to be the wrong fit for an energetic and hungry Argentina.
I thought England were going to win, so I can only imagine how an England fan must feel.
I have been reading a lot of England 'parking the bus' and I partially agree. The goal came in at the 55th minute and the defensive positioning was late in the game. That was the tactical mistake...
I have been reading a lot of England 'parking the bus' and I partially agree. The goal came in at the 55th minute and the defensive positioning was late in the game. That was the tactical mistake of the TD. Momentum turned to Argentina, leaving the world's best play maker on his own and then adding more defenders late on the game. Losing the middle to Argentina, England had no legs and that's it. Instead of adding midfield players who could have maintained possession instead the complete opposite was done. Really the game lost due to TD's decision. Of course key players were a no show; Kane are you there? If I was English I would certainly be upset with this game. It was in the bag and to have ended like it did is terrible.
England is the favorite going into this match. No doubt or excuse accepted, it either wins or forever becomes a footnote in the history of the game as chokers. History means nothing on the field,...
England is the favorite going into this match. No doubt or excuse accepted, it either wins or forever becomes a footnote in the history of the game as chokers. History means nothing on the field, England is going against the World Champion so can they do it? Based on the last game against Norway it certainly can so now they need to prove it or else…
Both teams are coming off the back of playing 30 extra minutes, so they'll both have that bit of extra wear in their legs. Messi is probably the one least feeling that, given his playing style...
Both teams are coming off the back of playing 30 extra minutes, so they'll both have that bit of extra wear in their legs. Messi is probably the one least feeling that, given his playing style these days (which works, don't get me wrong), but I reckon quite a few of the England runners will be feeling it.
The difference maker will need to be the 10 of ARG because Messi (as much of the GOAT status that he is, and I personally think and I like, otherwise I can't stand ARG) is a play maker. He is not...
The difference maker will need to be the 10 of ARG because Messi (as much of the GOAT status that he is, and I personally think and I like, otherwise I can't stand ARG) is a play maker. He is not developing the game, he is sit-and-wait predator; you give him space, it's over! Look at what he did to Egypt, he felt that game bc he had the strong smell of losing that game. I think the players to watch will be Julian Alvarez and Jude Belligham. The middle has been traditionally the difference maker so if ENG is able to control the middle, and strike with the right pace they should win. Again ENG is the favorite, no doubt about it. ARG is really a 10 man roster with 1 sniper waiting in the shadows. If Messi comes out and plays like he use to, ENG will be in trouble.
Messi is such a joy to watch, isn't he? He's easy to pick out padding around with his socks pulled up. I'm rooting for England, because it's been so long since they took home a trophy, although I...
Messi is such a joy to watch, isn't he? He's easy to pick out padding around with his socks pulled up. I'm rooting for England, because it's been so long since they took home a trophy, although I have to say it's very hard to look past Spain given how they managed to stifle France yesterday. I don't think the England I've seen playing so far could overcome that Spain masterclass any more than the French side could.
Bellingham is special though, he's got a great eye for a goal and he's a big, imposing figure. He's not as easy to bully as Yamal, yesterday, for example. I really think we've had great and deserving teams right from the round of 16, or even earlier, to be honest. And now, these final four, they're all special teams who fought their way through thick and thin for their place. I look forward to discussions tomorrow when this second semi has played out!
<RANT Coming> OK, so I got an itch and it's called VAR! I have kept quiet etc., but I have had it. VAR is out of control. So I don't watch or follow league play as much any more, if anything on a...
<RANT Coming> OK, so I got an itch and it's called VAR! I have kept quiet etc., but I have had it. VAR is out of control. So I don't watch or follow league play as much any more, if anything on a quiet Sunday morning I'll watch whatever replay I can of Barcelona or even English league games (not any team in particular) etc., However World Cup I watch it all, I really love it. 1st came this 4 quarter game for water that I can't stand, I understand but I hate it. It can be done better, but ok. But more than that item is VAR! It was a suppose to be a tool to help a REF but they have taken over the game all together. A goal isn't a goal unless VAR approves, a foul is a foul if VAR calls it and on. What the hell is the point of the field Referee then? Let's just people watch in slow motion and make decisions of real time action. I don't like it. VAR IMO should be used if a field REF calls a play and then that decision gets review, but to call to the field Ref to call a foul I think should not be allowed. Secondly, all reviews should be done in real time, no slow motion. People make decisions on real time, not slow mo, this is a game not some critical decision making thing. Yes, will things be missed, yes, but legends are built on that. I have heard all the arguments but this VAR is ruining the game. Ok, Rant Over.
I couldn't agree more about VAR, but I have to think it's very fitting for an American World Cup, no? I wonder how casual American viewers react to all the VAR delays, given their ubiquity in...
I couldn't agree more about VAR, but I have to think it's very fitting for an American World Cup, no? I wonder how casual American viewers react to all the VAR delays, given their ubiquity in their other sports.
First, thank you for agreeing with my point. Instant replay (VAR) in American sports has a different job depending on the sport it's dropped into. It’s not one universal fix. Take American...
First, thank you for agreeing with my point. Instant replay (VAR) in American sports has a different job depending on the sport it's dropped into. It’s not one universal fix. Take American football, the oldest adopter of instant replay came in during the mid-1980s. Watch a game, on TV or live, and one thing is obvious: it's slow. Commercial breaks have only made that worse. There are bursts of action, sure, but the sport's ethos was never built around uninterrupted flow. So replay doesn't really violate anything. It's just one more stoppage in a sport made of stoppages. Baseball is the closer comparison. Pace matters there too, momentum, tension, strategy, execution are the whole point, and a single blown call can be the thing everything turns on. That's what makes it worth caring about, the same way a penalty kick or a walk-off swing can flip a season in one moment. Baseball introduced replay in 2008, limited at first, expanded since, and purists still resent it. I'm a Yankees fan and I'm fine with it, the game's ethos doesn't take a hit. Baseball is already slow and deliberate by design. Replay doesn't change what the sport is, it just removes the chance that a blown call decides something big. Football is the opposite case, and this is where I actually get worked up. Football is supposed to be fast, no timeouts, no built-in breaks, 45 minutes of continuous motion per half. Referees make foul calls, players waste time, that's all part of the fabric. But the constancy itself is the point. It's why a goalkeeper picking up a back-pass gets whistled, why time-wasting gets a card, the sport polices anything that interrupts its own rhythm. VAR is a much bigger interruption than any of that. It's an external stoppage imposed on a sport whose entire identity is not stopping. That's not a minor tension, that's a direct contradiction of what makes the game the game, for me and for a lot of people who watch it the way I do. Today's Spain–France match is a good example. Mbappé picked up a yellow card that replay clearly should have overturned and didn't. It didn't change the result. But that's not really the point. The ref got it wrong, and the correction mechanism sitting right there didn't fix it. And here's the harder part of my own argument: VAR fixed that Argentina call and changed the outcome on the match with Switzerland and I'm not sure I'd want it to. Fair, no. But the universe doesn't owe anyone fairness, and neither does football. France isn't in the final. Maradona isn't a footnote. Neither outcome is fair. Both were earned in the sense that matters, inside the run of play, without an outside hand resetting the board. That's the standard the replay system needs to be held to, or it risks flattening the exact thing that makes the sport worth this much argument in the first place.
FIFA in all its corrupt glory dragged their feet for decades and when they relented they implemented a system so terribly slow and cumbersome it's hated by even the proponents of said idea. No the...
FIFA in all its corrupt glory dragged their feet for decades and when they relented they implemented a system so terribly slow and cumbersome it's hated by even the proponents of said idea.
No the current system isn't good, but the prior game that was full of fouls and flops isn't as rosy as people make it out to be today. There is absolutely no reason to allow any intentional fouling to dictate a game in the name of speed. Argentinian hands of god should be punished fully as the cheaters they are, not celebrated as some mystical play inspired from above.
Besides, Fair Play versus Speed is a false dichotomy for starters. There are similar hawk eye or VAR systems in place for other sports just as quick (or quicker) than football that still have an incredible top tier league. Hockey (the field type) for one has a working system that doesn't slow down the game and improves ref calls.
It needs improvement, not abolition. The reasons VAR was implemented in the first place will return with a vengeance.
My concern is simple, VAR for the good that it is; how it's currently being implemented is terrible for the game. It's not a question of, "can we introduce technology helpers", it's a question...
My concern is simple, VAR for the good that it is; how it's currently being implemented is terrible for the game. It's not a question of, "can we introduce technology helpers", it's a question should we have it. If we should, to what extent? If VAR is what you want, then remove field referee, not needed. Is that too much? What is the level that would be acceptable? Introducing the whole Maradona hand of god, flopping, missed foul, wasting time etc., is to me not a good argument. It's like asking why the Medieval ages took a 1000 years to 'fix' things? If we want to fix what is 'bad' then ok, let's fix it and be done with it. The problem with improvement is that the answer inevitably is more technology introduction. Instead of adding, let's remove and start there as a premise and then let's address the 'bad'. FIFA corrupt? Hell that's a hole without a bottom. Just look at the Argentina issue going on now. I do hope that Gianni Infantino get's booted out. I fully support that, he has brought so many issues that I think needs correction. This whole Team USA issue for starters with me. I am a Team USA supporter but I have to accept the cheater name calling. It's right. We have been stained by our adorable President. Anyway, FIFA corruption, yeah that's something but it is a different issue from VAR that I hope the Europeans fix, somehow.
There's a lot of really good commentary that I agree with you on, but I strongly disagree about Mbappe's yellow card being a bad call. Mbappe allowed his frustration to influence him, and fell for...
There's a lot of really good commentary that I agree with you on, but I strongly disagree about Mbappe's yellow card being a bad call. Mbappe allowed his frustration to influence him, and fell for the ragebait of an opponent deliberately slowing down the game. He can go for the ball, sure, but he has no business clattering into the keeper like that.
Reasonable people can disagree. Frustration shouldn't be booked. It's an emotion, what should we do, police player emotions. I used it as an example of what VAR is suppose to fix and it didn't. It...
Reasonable people can disagree. Frustration shouldn't be booked. It's an emotion, what should we do, police player emotions. I used it as an example of what VAR is suppose to fix and it didn't. It didn't change the outcome of the game but imagine if it had, then what? We don't know what may happen until the fat lady sing, to use an American colloquialism. Imagine the 10 minutes of ARG vs Egypt. That may have happen in this match with France and then what? Go back and re-address a bad call? Makes no sense to me.
Frustration, an emotion, shouldn't be booked - absolutely. But physically running into the keeper should be booked. He wasn't booked for feeling frustrated, he was booked for taking out that...
Frustration, an emotion, shouldn't be booked - absolutely. But physically running into the keeper should be booked. He wasn't booked for feeling frustrated, he was booked for taking out that frustration on the keeper.
I'm not an avid football fan in real life. I only watch the world cup, and maybe the euros, so I just get football in two-year doses, which is enough for me. So I genuinely don't know if VAR's interventions in this world cup are typical of how it's used in the top leagues these days. And honestly, I quite like it (although I'll whisper that opinion when I'm among football-loving friends), I find it all quite high drama. We see the ref pause, perhaps touch an ear, and we know they're hearing something. We try and read the fleeting microexpressions as both teams group up and start gesticulating madly. Then he draws out a TV in the air with his hands! Now everyone on the benches is up, the coach is either hopping or stoic, hands pocketed deep, as the ref jogs, Moses-like, through the middle of the crowds held back by the officials. Then the replay, slow speed, even slower speed, freeze frames. The pronouncement, in possibly quite broken English, the mic amplification kicking in just a few seconds too late so the ref's first few words are lost. The stadium is plunged into silence apart from one voice pronouncing doom. It's great fun.
Don't forget the yellow cards for players idiotically trying to argue with the ref about a decision made after watching a replay several times, and which he may not have even been the one to make.
Don't forget the yellow cards for players idiotically trying to argue with the ref about a decision made after watching a replay several times, and which he may not have even been the one to make.
Time for my next uninformed soccer take by an American who watches a little bit of soccer every 4yrs. Tf was England doing? Why did they not do anything? Seemed wild to get one goal and then just...
Time for my next uninformed soccer take by an American who watches a little bit of soccer every 4yrs.
Tf was England doing? Why did they not do anything? Seemed wild to get one goal and then just be like "Let's play totally defensively from here on out." Like not even wanting to get an "insurance" goal or two. Argentina kept attacking, little by little. And England held up, but it felt like it was just a matter of time...And then it happened.
And then it happened again.
Someone on reddit had a great comment. Something like. "HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF! RED COATS GET BEAT IN THE COLONIES AND GET SENT BACK HOME" lol...
It can be a bit difficult to quantify when such a monumental shift in pacing happens. Consider how both sides probably had a plan covering a person or a zone and that seemed to work well in favour...
It can be a bit difficult to quantify when such a monumental shift in pacing happens. Consider how both sides probably had a plan covering a person or a zone and that seemed to work well in favour of England right until the goal.
Argentinian positioning then changes, defense moves forward, midfielders assist their attackers, and suddenly England's zone or man defense is saturated and leaving gaps. It's risky for Argentina because aggression leaves room in the back, England nearly capitalized on that too, but the English defensive swap sealed the deal. They could no longer effectively defend man to man with such a crowded field nor attack in return.
That Argentinian aggression is tiring and only works if you can keep the momentum. It slowed a little until the first goal skyrocketed their morale so they could keep it up until the end.
I'd like to see Argentina lose, they're not my type of team, but that second half showed they clearly deserved this win.
One commentator on Dutch tv said that he was happy the English scaredy cat football wasn't rewarded. I agree.
I'm by no means an expert, but the relatively good commentators on my feed were saying the same thing. They were very critical at the time of England's strategy of 'stopping playing football'...
I'm by no means an expert, but the relatively good commentators on my feed were saying the same thing.
They were very critical at the time of England's strategy of 'stopping playing football' (harshly worded) after the goal, and further 'parking the bus' with the defensive substitutions just before Argentina's goals.
They said such a strategy would only be workable if England's lead were greater, and if Argentina wasn't completely dominant in the second half. So the professionals (in my language) were as baffled as you are
It’s actually pretty common. Arsenal won a premier league (in)famously with this strategy last season. Often called parking the bus, or more recently haramball. Goals are hard and although it’s...
Seemed wild to get one goal and then just be like "Let's play totally defensively from here on out."
It’s actually pretty common. Arsenal won a premier league (in)famously with this strategy last season. Often called parking the bus, or more recently haramball.
Goals are hard and although it’s ugly to watch, if you 10 goalkeepers it’s even harder.
That may be so, but it seemed clear to me that the strategy was breaking down. I expected England to go back on the offensive at some point. OK maybe save their own energy for a bit, try to wear...
That may be so, but it seemed clear to me that the strategy was breaking down. I expected England to go back on the offensive at some point. OK maybe save their own energy for a bit, try to wear out the Argentina players, and then start attacking again.
And I guess technically England did. With 5min left in the match and Argentina up by one.
Football is game without timeouts. It's hard for players to change their strategy up when Argentina scored so late. They held a good defense for some 30ish minutes. It's easy to say in hindsight...
Football is game without timeouts. It's hard for players to change their strategy up when Argentina scored so late. They held a good defense for some 30ish minutes.
It's easy to say in hindsight that the strategy was bad now that they lost. But it's also how they played against Mexico, and people praised England for their tight game in that match.
Certainly it's bad football to watch, so if it wasn't for how hated Argentina is a lot more people would be happy that haramball gets beaten.
Big difference between the games, England were up by two to start and we're down a man. Even then Mexico came close a few times to forcing extra time. Whilst it's easy to say they should've...
Big difference between the games, England were up by two to start and we're down a man. Even then Mexico came close a few times to forcing extra time.
Whilst it's easy to say they should've pressed for a second, Argentina really upped their tempo in general after going 1 down. It makes sense initially that England dropped back a bit like JCPhoenix says to try and ride that out they instead ended up dropping deeper allowing Argentina to control the game.
This game was lost by the TD. The momentum changed and he did not react well at all. He put in defensive players late in the game against the world's quality offensive players. Incredible tactical...
This game was lost by the TD. The momentum changed and he did not react well at all. He put in defensive players late in the game against the world's quality offensive players. Incredible tactical decision. Midfield, forwards had no legs, completely gave up on keeping possession and decided to give the ball to Argentina. Argentina! Luckily the English goalie came out and defended well otherwise it would very well have ended with 4 or 5 goals against England. What was Tuchel thinking! Then to say that he had no regrets! Wow! The English supporters certainly have patience. I am not an English supporters but I was about to throw a brick at the tv. WTF! Players also have responsibility but overall they did their job except for Kane. Nice fellow but he should have been taken out. He was not doing anything on this game.
I can think, offhand, of 3 really good saves by Pickford, when the ball was heading towards the back of the net without his dive/punch etc. And there was a shot that hit the post pretty squarely....
I can think, offhand, of 3 really good saves by Pickford, when the ball was heading towards the back of the net without his dive/punch etc. And there was a shot that hit the post pretty squarely. That's at least 4 bits of luck/skill that kept the England team in the game. A 2-1 scoreline honestly makes it sound like a closer game than it was. I gather Tuchel was screaming from the sidelines for them to get up the field, but they just couldn't. And his change putting Konsa on was him sort of resigning himself to the fact that the players weren't able to implement any sort of breaking out strategy.
TD isn't a term I've heard in relation to football before, but based on context I'm guessing it's a different one for the Manager/Head Coach? Any chance you could confirm what it stands for and...
TD isn't a term I've heard in relation to football before, but based on context I'm guessing it's a different one for the Manager/Head Coach?
Any chance you could confirm what it stands for and the sport most commonly using the phrase? (I'm guessing might be American football?)
TD = technical director Italy legends react as Maldini appointed technical director In football at least, I grew up calling the 'head coach', technical director, TD for short.
This World Cup's been so weird for me, as I was VERY skeptical/jaded going in, and almost entirely missed out on the usual World Cup fever. It's mostly passed me by - I've watched maybe one full...
This World Cup's been so weird for me, as I was VERY skeptical/jaded going in, and almost entirely missed out on the usual World Cup fever. It's mostly passed me by - I've watched maybe one full match, caught only one as it was happening, and haven't even tried that hard to dodge spoilers. I didn't even look up the knockout brackets until yesterday. I've finally caught up to speed via Fox's pretty good extended highlights playlist on YouTube though and am looking forward to the last few games. I will say, the quality of the tournament has definitely been diluted by the expansion, but it's hard to argue with the drama that's been served up.
Quick takes:
Not surprised to see Brazil knocked out fairly early.
Disappointed that Japan didn't make it further, I thought they were a good dark horse and played some great football at times.
Argentina's cycle is sputtering out... they're lucky the draw was kind to them, by no means are they among the four best teams in the tournament (from what I've seen, at least). If England doesn't batter them, they don't deserve to make it to the final.
Spain is the national team I usually have a soft spot for, but I've never seen a squad rated so highly with so few world-class players. They have maybe three (Rodri, Lamine Yamal... Pedri?).
By rights the final should be France-England, and without working out the permutations before the tournament, that would have been the final I'd have thought was most merited. I have to hope England gets their dreams crushed though, we'd never hear the end of it if they won. So, allez Les Bleus!!
I am sorry. I try and I try but I just cannot make myself want English football fans to be happy. Individual fans may be lovely, but they do not travel well, and they come to my country.
I am sorry. I try and I try but I just cannot make myself want English football fans to be happy.
Individual fans may be lovely, but they do not travel well, and they come to my country.
That’s a bit harsh but miracles happen sometimes and maybe it’s England the lucky recipient of it. I have not seen the heart of a Champion in the team but hey, I also expected FRANCE to win.
That’s a bit harsh but miracles happen sometimes and maybe it’s England the lucky recipient of it. I have not seen the heart of a Champion in the team but hey, I also expected FRANCE to win.
3rd Place Match - England vs France, Miami, July 18 If these teams made it to the final, the English were already going to call it Agincourt II. If you don't know the battle of Agincourt, it was...
3rd Place Match - England vs France, Miami, July 18
If these teams made it to the final, the English were already going to call it Agincourt II. If you don't know the battle of Agincourt, it was England's last consequential victory in the 100 Years War before Henry V died of dysentery and his son lost all of their French conquests.
Anyway, what to call it now? What's a battle that both of them don't really want to be at, where the outcome doesn't change the overall result, where everyone's a bit wet and wants to go home.
The Battle of Ushant: Round 2! This time we're fighting in America. Plus, we might have reached the stage of internal recriminations on the England side, mirroring the two English admirals who disliked each other more than they disliked the French.
I don't really watch the third place game as a rule but I've come to really enjoy both the English and the French teams, so I'll be tuning into this one.
Welcome to America Facts™ Bienvenidos a Miami Miami is named for the river of the same name, which is named for the Mayaimi people. (No relation to the Miami people of woodlands tribes in...
Miami is named for the river of the same name, which is named for the Mayaimi people. (No relation to the Miami people of woodlands tribes in Illinois. Same with the recognized Miami tribe in Oklahoma who used to live in Illinois but don't now, because of the colonization.)
Did you know it was founded by a woman? I didn't!
It has the warmest winters in the US, which means mid-July is a great time to hold a game there.
Thank you for another amazing America Fact! I often wondered if the history of first nations people in Florida was different from Northeastern/'Plains'/Western groups due to initial contact with...
Thank you for another amazing America Fact!
I often wondered if the history of first nations people in Florida was different from Northeastern/'Plains'/Western groups due to initial contact with the Spanish.
The Spanish had a truly odd relationship to colonization, because of their extremely legalistic culture. I've read several books about the bizarre fact that native culture persists so much more in Central and South America because, once the requirimento was read, first nations people were Spanish subjects, and could legally challenge colonizer actions in courts in Spain.
Obviously the dice were massively stacked against them, but it is an interesting fragment of history.
For Florida, though, this didn't seem to make much of a difference. Infectious diseases and policies of extermination by English colonists to the north of Florida meant that most of the first nations peoples encountered in the 17th century were gone as coherent polities by the 18th.
Of the two 'federally recognized' tribes in Florida (?), both are noteworthy. The Seminole people came together and created a shared identity from many of the remnants of groups that were wiped out by disease and genocide by the English/US colonists. Florida had been a place of refugee for escaped slaves for decades before the American revolution, and the Seminole people mixed material culture and lifeways, incorporating aspects of Gullah culture. This pissed off Andrew Jackson so badly he launched a war of extermination on the Seminole, ending up with many being forcibly marched to Oklahoma in the trail of tears.
In more recent news, a coalition of environmental groups hoping to protect the Florida Everglades and the Miccousukee people of Florida caused the closure of the so-called Alligator Alcatraz concentration camp, successfully arguing in court that the proximity of their villages close to the camp meant its building was illegal. This coalition was successful, with Miccosukee spokespeople stating that:
As Native peoples, we have a sacred obligation passed down from our ancestors to care for the land and everyone who depends on it. The construction of the detention center in Florida was on the ancestral lands of the Miccosukee Tribe. The buildings endangered delicate and protected ecosystems. Alligator Alcatraz put thousands of immigrants at risk. The reported filthy and unsafe conditions were a violation of the human rights of immigrants and their families.
The administration’s violent crackdown on migrant communities is an affront to all we stand for as Native peoples. We are opposed to any government operation that violates the human rights of our neighbors and all who reside on this land. As we saw in Minneapolis earlier this year, ICE operations operate with little to no oversight or safeguards, acting illegally in many cases. Multiple people, including babies, have died in, or as a result of, ICE custody. This must end.
The closure of Alligator Alcatraz is a victory for human rights and Tribal Sovereignty, but we want to see an end to all inhumane and unlawful detention of our neighbors who are simply trying to live, work, and raise their families.
Perhaps not cheerful facts, but very illustrative of Florida's complex society and history that defies the easy memes of 'Florida man' etc. And special shout out to the Florida panther, my personal favourite North American big cat.
I'm a fan of the cougar (Tupi in origin) by her many, many names as well. And her screaming! I don't care if they're Florida panthers, mountain lions, catamounts, gol (Tehuelche), grey ghosts,...
I'm a fan of the cougar (Tupi in origin) by her many, many names as well. And her screaming! I don't care if they're Florida panthers, mountain lions, catamounts, gol (Tehuelche), grey ghosts, shunta-haska (Mandans), night crier, deer tiger, puma (Quechua), mountain devil, silver lion, Erielhonan (Lake Erie tribes), sneak cat, swamp screamer, çuçuarana (Portuguese from Tupi), and the one you say when you meet them in person "oh shit, shit shit shit shit aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaugh"... I love them.
This has been Mitzli Facts ℠ (Aztec)
The Mayaimi appear to have been the victims of raids by other indigenous tribes, and the survivors may have gone to Cuba. (Not accounting for the mass casualties from disease in the Americas) I did not dig too deep, as I need some positivity still and researching Native histories is far less joyful and names for a Puma concolor.
I had no idea they had so many awesome names! Erielhonan is a great name for my next sneaky grey cat. Aka Night Crier (I am hungry), aka Swamp Screamer (I am hungry in a swamp)
I had no idea they had so many awesome names!
Erielhonan is a great name for my next sneaky grey cat. Aka Night Crier (I am hungry), aka Swamp Screamer (I am hungry in a swamp)
Yeah, it's probably going to be a pretty boring game, since no one really cares about the third place and it's too hot to play anyway. Prediction: France scores at some point due to a penalty,...
Yeah, it's probably going to be a pretty boring game, since no one really cares about the third place and it's too hot to play anyway.
Prediction: France scores at some point due to a penalty, England crumbles like a dry cookie, lots of tired ball possession gameplay and passing ensues, and France scores again cause Olise wants his goal. France 2 - England 0, allez les bleus.
Well, I got basically everything right, except the game was not boring at all, but very entertaining, and well, the French didn't score first, no, Declan Rice did for England, and then the English...
Well, I got basically everything right, except the game was not boring at all, but very entertaining, and well, the French didn't score first, no, Declan Rice did for England, and then the English team didn't crumble, nay, it was the French who fell apart and played really miserableus, and because of this Olise didn't score and instead Konsa and Saka and Saka did again, so my 2:0 was slightly off and ended up being a 0:4. And that was only the first half.
The second half wasn't exactly boring either when France suddenly woke up, looked really scary and scored four wonderful goals, while England got the penalty I envisioned for France, and then Bellingham scored another goal, so we got a 4:6 for the English who end up with the deserved third place.
But the rest was exactly as I predicted: both teams kicked a ball.
Nah, seriously: in the first half that was probably the best England and the worst France I've ever seen. Totally unexpected (for me), and in the end well played by both teams. Definitely the most entertaining game of this world cup.
Also really nice for Deschamps that his last game didn't end up as the complete trainwreck that the first half was.
That was an insane game and I was thinking about your prediction after the first two goals! 😂 Really felt like the French were treating it as a kick around until the second goal, and then the...
That was an insane game and I was thinking about your prediction after the first two goals! 😂
Really felt like the French were treating it as a kick around until the second goal, and then the momentum just ran away.
That was less the Battle of Ushant than it was the Battle of the Nile. The second half was really fun, seeing France come roaring back. I very much wanted some extra time but seeing Bellingham subbed on to cap an incredible tournament by him was nearly as good.
I kept wondering if this victory would make things better or worse for English fans in the post-mortem. Tuchel has tried to explain that, versus Argentina, his team got into such a defensive mindset that he couldn't shake them out of it. His rationale for the centre-back subs was 'if they're going to play defensive, I may as well put good defenders in there.'
But if I was an England fan, seeing Saka score a hat-trick and Rice creating so many opportunities for his playing time, I would think this was a team that could beat Spain. A decisive 2-0 loss might have been psychologically easier to take.
I'm glad the French decided that it's worth playing in the second half. Because that got crazy and actually entertaining. Like I get it's a third place consolation prize. But it's still a match on...
I'm glad the French decided that it's worth playing in the second half. Because that got crazy and actually entertaining. Like I get it's a third place consolation prize. But it's still a match on the world stage. Yeah, fine, you don't have to play like it's the final match of the WC, for all the marbles. But be entertaining! And once the French got back in the second half, we got a fun match. Was France was gonna rally back? Oh boy!
It's OK that defense kinda took a backseat this time around. At least no one parked the bus this time!
Yes, losing is fine, and I understand playing half of a B-team to get them some minutes on the big stage. But 4-0 would just be humiliating, and this France team deserve so much better than to end...
Yes, losing is fine, and I understand playing half of a B-team to get them some minutes on the big stage. But 4-0 would just be humiliating, and this France team deserve so much better than to end on such a defeat. They've been great to watch this tournament. Mbappe has looked so dangerous so often, as have many, many other players from that squad. I'm glad they came back and rattled England.
Saka is so, so good. He's such a worker, will be up and down the wing and has been involved in so many of England's good plays. I've had a soft spot for him ever since he stepped up at a pretty...
Saka is so, so good. He's such a worker, will be up and down the wing and has been involved in so many of England's good plays. I've had a soft spot for him ever since he stepped up at a pretty young age (19!) to take a penalty in a euro final in 2020 and missed it. He looked crushed, and was crying, and knew (correctly, unfortunately) that he was going to be on the receiving end of a lot of hate, because football fans love to love their players, but I think they might love to hate them even more. I think the mental fortitude to come back from that kind of thing, while something that athletes just have to do, is very admirable. I don't know him, or follow him on social media, so I don't know, I hope he's not an arse in real life - he's always struck me as a pretty gracious guy. Clean player, bags of talent.
I don't watch a lot of soccer. World Cup is about as much as I watch (and I haven't even watched that much of this WC). But even to someone like me, Embolo's dive during the ARGvSUI game was so...
I don't watch a lot of soccer. World Cup is about as much as I watch (and I haven't even watched that much of this WC). But even to someone like me, Embolo's dive during the ARGvSUI game was so ridiculously obvious (to a viewer; clearly not to the ref because of what happened next).
I'm playing a game, and had the match up on another screen. I kinda looked over as that unfolded and even I was like, "What? No one even touched the Swiss player...Come on, get up..."
Then the Argentine player got the yellow and even I was like "What? Really?" Then VAR was called. And the yellow was reversed and given to Embolo for such an egregious dive, which turned it into a red since he already had a yellow.
That one dumb flop, to me, sealed it for the Swiss. One man down and constantly on the backfoot for the next 40+ min, through ET, until Argentina scored again. Twice even. Maybe it would've been different for the Swiss had that not happened.
And honestly? Argentina against a Swiss team of 10 men and it took them til second half of ET for them to clinch it? Either Swiss defense was amazing or Argentina just wasn't on it. Maybe it really would've been a different ending if the Swiss had all 11 the whole time.
Idk how the next match will end up. Either way, bring on the Falklands Wars 2: World Cup Boogaloo!
EDIT: Wish I lived in KC still. I imagine the parties tonight must be insane!
As a lifelong soccer fan and player, it's not that easy to score even against a team with a man down. France (arguably the strongest team in the world atm) only defeated Paraguay 1-0 and it was...
As a lifelong soccer fan and player, it's not that easy to score even against a team with a man down.
France (arguably the strongest team in the world atm) only defeated Paraguay 1-0 and it was with a penalty. It's super hard to score when all the other team does is keep its men tightly defending. Dribbling past 1 guy is already hard, put two together and it's almost impossible, which is why so many teams just try crosses until something happens.
Switzerland defended well and it's why it took so long for Argentine to score, even though they still had a few good chances that got saved by the goalie.
But yeah, I've drawn games playing with 9 men and won playing with 10, it's the nature of the game, goals are rare.
I thought it was a pretty egregious flop, but did I think it deserved a red? No, play on. As much as I hate flopping, if you are going to start calling it you gotta call it evenly, and no other...
I thought it was a pretty egregious flop, but did I think it deserved a red? No, play on. As much as I hate flopping, if you are going to start calling it you gotta call it evenly, and no other flops were treated the same way in that game. It's not helping the "Argentina is helped by the refs" narrative, and I want Messi to have a great last World Cup.
As for the Norway England game, I was rooting for Norway, but they really phoned it in in the later minutes, and that's been punished hard this world cup. I wonder if slowing down too much in the heat lets the exhaustion build too much, but they were not attacking nearly enough to win that game.
Agreed, but the initial yellow card was not given for the fake, cause a lot of players were flopping. The yellow was given for a fake tackle that didn't happen, then was forced by the rules of the...
Agreed, but the initial yellow card was not given for the fake, cause a lot of players were flopping. The yellow was given for a fake tackle that didn't happen, then was forced by the rules of the book to be given for the flop. Don't get me wrong, Id rather start yellow carding a lot of these flops, cause it's just bad soccer to me. Especially after the Netherlands Morocco game, where one or two players played through bleeding scalp wounds. That was a mark of courage and grit right there.
But at the same time, it's still the Swiss players fault, doubly so. First for the egregious tackle that got him the first yellow, and then for flopping the second time. It is what it is.
Oh I agree I hate the flops and it's one of the reasons why the Men's World Cup is secondary to the Women's World Cup for me. (Also because I flat out think it's better).
Oh I agree I hate the flops and it's one of the reasons why the Men's World Cup is secondary to the Women's World Cup for me. (Also because I flat out think it's better).
Fifa could do more too. I mean I have low expectations but they could do more. It's also why it'll always be the Men's World Cup, not the World Cup. (And I know it could specify FIFA but in context)
Fifa could do more too. I mean I have low expectations but they could do more.
It's also why it'll always be the Men's World Cup, not the World Cup. (And I know it could specify FIFA but in context)
I disagree, it’s not better or worse. Different, maybe. Women sports in general don’t get the respect but that’s a different point. In terms of football, women’s football has gotten better,...
I disagree, it’s not better or worse. Different, maybe. Women sports in general don’t get the respect but that’s a different point. In terms of football, women’s football has gotten better, initially it wasn’t great. Something similar to women’s basketball in terms of physical contact allowance and referees out of touch. Today’s football women matches are better, less physical contact allowance and incredible talent that has made the game better. Is it the same as men’s football game, I think so but that’s my opinion.
I think it's better than the men's game and will probably not change that until the men stop getting nominated for Emmy's. I don't find the NBA entertaining either. I don't watch the WNBA...
I think it's better than the men's game and will probably not change that until the men stop getting nominated for Emmy's. I don't find the NBA entertaining either. I don't watch the WNBA regularly but enjoy when I do. I just don't follow sports teams much. Mostly I hate the toxicity of men's leagues and love the inclusiveness of the women's leagues.
It's an opinion so there's not really a debate. But the Men's World Cup is the worse one IMO.
You should have a hell of a team in four years' time, at least. This generation of players should grow from this and come back stronger. Also, call me old-fashioned but winning the World Cup is...
You should have a hell of a team in four years' time, at least. This generation of players should grow from this and come back stronger.
Also, call me old-fashioned but winning the World Cup is wasted on a foreign coach. I don't know that I'd ever want to see it happen, it could never mean as much to them as the people of the country.
Int'l TD in what are Tier 1 football countries like England makes no sense at all. Brasil just like England TDs. There should be quality TDs in-house otherwise it's a loss all around. You can have...
Int'l TD in what are Tier 1 football countries like England makes no sense at all. Brasil just like England TDs. There should be quality TDs in-house otherwise it's a loss all around. You can have all the quality players in the world but having a TD that isn't part of the fabric of the country then to me is a gap. Int'l TD will play a 'professional' game which is good in club play but not in Int'l setting. I watch Brasil to see Brasil football not some European positioning and strategy. Makes no sense. Tuchel for all the bad decision that the game versus Argentina showed, it's at least English football I watched. However, I hear his interview and I am at a loss. As the English say, 'being gutted' and what I hear is a typical German response. No knock on German football or country but his respose is typical of a German person speaking and responding. It works for them, but not what I expect from an English TD. Conversely, countries like the USA, it works having Int'l TDs though US Soccer seem hell bent on ruining their experience and knowledge.
Hope you had fun with the match today! What a show from England, that was some of the most fun football I've seen, even if it wasn't consequential in the tournament. So many epic moments. Anyone...
Hope you had fun with the match today! What a show from England, that was some of the most fun football I've seen, even if it wasn't consequential in the tournament.
So many epic moments. Anyone who says the England squad are bad is a fool.
Norway v England Discussion
793 CE. 8 June. Longships are sighted off the coast of Northumbria. The monks greet the Norse crew with a friendly 'alright mate?' The greeting is returned in a way that the monks will later describe as 'not very sporting, actually.'
History will never be the same. But will it repeat itself in Miami?
No. The Norwegian team are not seasonal farmers who raid due to economic forces, and the English team do not seem to be particularly pious or cloistered away copying out manuscripts.
BUT WILL HISTORY RHYME?!
PREPARE FOR LINDISFARNE II: MIAMI EDITION!
I fell asleep right as the NORvENG game was starting. Then I woke up at the half of extra time. Those Norwegians looked TIRED in the last ~10min. At least compared to the the English. I get they're playing 90+ min of soccer, in hot and humid-ass Miami. But it's the World Cup.
Also, that post-match interview with Tuchel was something else. His team won yet he was not particularly happy! Though the tournament is over yet, so perhaps it makes sense to still be "on."
I think it was tough for Tuchel because Norway really, really fell apart, especially in the last ten minutes of regular time. It was like watching two different teams.
The first half and first play session of the second Norway were really coming to life and just putting a lot of pressure on England in the goals. I think they had something like 12 shots on goal with 6 of them on target. Pickford was only just getting to Norway's shots to deflect them, and then suddenly Nyland was put under serious pressure in the last ten mins. He played amazingly.
Norway couldn't find a way in extra time to put any offensive pressure on. Braut Haaland looked absolutely wrecked even towards the end of the first half, to the point where we were wondering if it was to try and lull England into a false sense of security. But he was just absolutely destroyed, whether by humidity (40 apparenty temperature!) or some other issue.
Schjelderup's cross-that-turned-into-a-goal was amazing. Djed Spence played incredibly, and Jude Bellingham was able to be creative and create opportunities where Ødegaard really struggled.
A great match that unfortunately fizzled out at the end. Very happy my team made it this far, and it is a shame, as I think Argentina and Switzerland are both much weaker teams than England. But that is the luck of the draw!
This ended up being a re-run of Stamford Bridge instead of Lindisfarne, but it very much seems as Norway has not only had an extremely successful return to the Cup, but brought a lot of joy to people around the world. That is a nice consolation.
Maggie Thatcher, your boys took a hell of a beating!
Currently in CEST compared to BST so this game has gone from late but comfortable to pushing it a bit. Though that's mainly with rumours that it may be delayed due to weather like England's previous game with Mexico.
This has been my favourite Norsemen/English rematch post I've seen, but there are so many.
I'm really looking forward to this game. Apart from regional loyalties, as @pxl pointed out, there's good football history between the two teams.
As much as I enjoy jokingly teasing England fans, I think the result either way would be very impressive. Norway for proving themselves to be a fully cohesive team and not just the Haaland show, and England living up to fan expecations of a well-developed and gritty side.
A colleague yesterday said about Norway 'our boys are not used to playing in the humidity', which reminded me of this very famous clip from an Arsenal fan
Your first link broke.
Fixed. Thanks for letting me know. Imgur really isn't what it used to be
Does anyone have any good Imgur alternatives?
On the whole controversy over Norway's goal being taken away: Haaland definitely pushed the dude in a way that gave them an unfair advantage. Anderson might have been able to hold his ground if he really wanted to, but he would've stumbled backwards pretty hard. The call to redo the corner I think was fair. In any case, FIFA needs to get its act together on contact in general. If the rules aren't airtight, then even teams that don't want to play dirty will have to play a little dirty eventually, lest they be at a disadvantage.
I'm of course rooting for England, but not just because I'm an Englishman. Hopefully us winning the World Cup will finally put It's Coming Home to rest.
It's a "we haven't won in 30+ years, woe is me" football song.
Haaland will be a huge fucking problem though. He single-handedly carried Manchester City to multiple Premier League trophies...
Weirdly though the song was originally released for Euro 96 since we were hosting.
I think they updated it for France 98 to be a bit more World Cup.
As much as it gets over done, I don't think even winning either the world cup or euros will stop chants of "it's coming home" each time they roll around.
Personally for England football songs I'm more partial to Vindaloo...
Y'all almost had it in 2023!
My little realm of social media has fallen in love with Haaland so I must support Norway, myself.
I think even lots of non-English people know 'It's Coming Home' from last World Cup. That and Three Lions were written by David Baddiel and Frank Skinner, who both have a lot to answer for.
I'm referring to the songs primarily, but Baddiel didn't really try on UK Taskmaster. It's okay to play a grumpy old man character, but you have to put in a little bit of effort.
Baddiel also has a troubling past with regard to racism.
His obsession with anti semitism seems to have led him to deny other forms of racism have relevance, and thus to exhibit it shamelessly, frequently, and targetedly, on national TV.
The Final - Spain vs Argentina
Spain relies on discipline and ball control, with each player slotting into a well planned system.
Argentina's game this tournament has been much more uneven, but also much more exciting, with young players taking advantage of the opportunities Messi is able to create, from gaps other players can't see or pass to.
Stat of the tournament: Spain have only been scored on once in the tournament, in the quarterfinal against Belgium.
Personally, I'm going for Spain because the young Argentines pulled that Las Malvinas shit after the England game. I am not a 'no politics in sport' person, as sport is inherently political. But I am very firmly 'no far-right nationalist politics in sport', and as Fifa will not do anything, I can at least lend my support to the Spanish squad.
There've been a lot of funny memes of South American fans sadly resigning themselves to support their colonizer over the Argentines. I knew Argentina (as a side, and their fans) was disliked within and without South America, but not to this extent!
I'm hoping for 2-0 Spain but my predictions have been wrong all tournament
I predict a game with many fouls, at least two red cards and lots of complaining. Messi will tragically miss a penalty. Spain will be the dominant team in a mediocre game that'll end Spain 1, Argentina 0, ¡ole!
I mean, you pretty much nailed it.
I'm not sure how this could happen... 😅
Shu is the Chosen One.
Well,
only one red card(e: just saw that 'Phisticuffs' Paredes got red after the game, so it's been actually two red cards) and Messi wasn't really doing much this game, but the rest was kinda on point. 🙃Spain deserved this, I think. Argentina just couldn't create chances against them.
I'm interested to see what the reaction in Argentina will be to Messi's performance in this final, and how it affects his legacy long-term. After having gone from blaming him for so long and so much that he retired, to loving him after he finally won in Qatar, how will they frame him basically going missing today?
Personally, I think he is quite probably the best footballer to ever set foot on a pitch, but there have undoubtedly been big occasions where you'd want him to drag everyone over the line and he's just been conspicuously... meek. Which is not to say that he's never done it, but I don't think it's an unfair criticism when comparing him to the other legends of the game.
Yeah, but when top players like Messi, Ronaldo, Haaland, etc. have to play against two or three world class defenders even they will have a hard time. Often these players still manage to create opportunities out of nothing, but the Spain defense is probably the best in the world, Messi is 39 and it's also clear that Spain would try to take him out of the game since Argentinas whole playstyle depends heavily on him. It's understandable that he couldn't messi his way out of this.
I would hope that in the longterm Argentinians are just happy that they had one of the best players ever in their team (if not the best). They'd be incredibly ungrateful if they'd criticise Messi for not winning the final when he was the only reason why their team made it so far in the first place (not to mention all the other titles he helped to win for them).
Eh, from my outsiders perspective, he didn't do a lot today but neither did anyone for Argentina except Martinez. He deserves Man of the Match, cause there is no way Argentina makes it to extra time without him.
Given you are essentially a psychic based on yesterday's results, I'll lock that in to my head.
Shu the Octopus
Haha, yeah, after this prediction it's probably going to be an awesome and super fair game with a 2:2 after 90 minutes and Argentina winning the penalty shoot-out. Messi scores three times. 🙂
What an incredible game!!!
The stat of the match has to be Argentina having zero shots on goal in regular time to Spain's 16. 762 Spanish passes completed to Argentina's 357.
I'm not normally a stats person, but I think if a person saw a 1-0 score after extra time it doesn't show how dominant Spain were for the entire match.
Congratulations to Spain!
Without a doubt the right team won!
Disgraceful display by Argentina post game as well.
What happened post game? The sportsmanship from Argentina has really been earning them the "anyone but them" thing but I couldn't watch the match today so not sure what they did
Parades physically attacking multiple Spanish players. Wouldn't be surprised if he gets a multiple game ban off the back of it.
On and off the pitch. Sometimes a few names pop up regularly and that's often an indication they're playing well. In the case of Paredes it just meant he kicked someone in the shins again. Absolutely dismal display of sportsmanship by most of Argentina. Even more than any other game in this cup so far.
I'm certain Spanish players were instructed not to let it get to them. They kept cool and played a (mostly) clean match.
Ah, but also will they care given it being the end of a cup cycle.
Potentially, but depends on the length of the ban, most likely it'll only affect qualifiers for CONMEBOL.
Jeeeeeeeeez I'll have to go find a clip
A clip (reddit)
Another
It was interesting seeing how different these two teams were. I only really started watching the WC this past week. Other than watching a couple US matches and the England vs Norway quarterfinal (well...the last 10min or so). So it's not like I saw Spain nor Argentina before this past week. But I kept hearing how if Spain gets to the end, and if Argentina does as well, they'll destroy Argentina. But then I thought, "Yeah, but that's what people said about some of these other match ups and they didn't seem to pan out. And this is Argentina. Plus Messi (even if he is old* now)."
But nah, this time it was true. Spain seemed to be on a different level than Argentina. So much more coordinated and confident. They pretty much controlled that game from the start. I think only at the end when Argentina was getting a little (lot) desperate, was I thinking, "Uh oh, Spain better keep it together." Which they managed to do.
Congrats to Spain! Good guys definitely won. Without really having a lot of background about Argentina...yeah...I see why they have the reputation they do.
*I call him old...him and I are like the same age 😭
I wouldn't say the Malvinas message adheres to far right politics in Argentina. It's written officially on every Argentinian bus for example.
Thanks for the correction, it does appear that nationalism around the Falklands goes across the political spectrum in Argentina. I read a few papers on it and it seems like all parties can't animate voters without invoking the issue. The fact that it's written on buses does not make it any less strange to me, but I'm viewing this from a different continent
However, it doesn't matter anymore
LAS MALVINAS SON ESPAÑOLAS!!!
I believe that's part of the basis for Argentina's claim, in that Spain ceded it to them.
I was just reposting a silly joke that made me laugh. I will freely admit that I do not understand why this issue is the issue that powers Argentine nationalism and identity, even after reading about it for a few hours.
I will leave who physically possesses the islands to the UN, or, more likely, military might. But spiritually they currently belong to Yamal and Fernan Torres, at least for the next few months. (/S in case it was needed)
The current residents voted with like 90% turnout and only 3 people voted to join Argentina. It's not super populated but I think it's a low enough percentage to leave things where they are.
Probably. I'm not an expert and perhaps there's a flaw in my thoughts
To add to the vote, supposedly at least one of them only voted that way as they thought 100% voting to remain British would be suspicious.
Argentina v Switzerland Discussion
After accusations of pro-Argentine refereeing in the quarterfinals against Egypt, Messi's team (who have no control over that unless you've got specific knowledge of FIFA corruption to say otherwise) look set to take on the plucky cowherds and bankers* of Europe's most famous alpine fortress.
*That bit was a joke, they are professional football players.
Will Messi add to his current golden boot tally of 8? Will the Swiss pay back the lack off respect their team has been accorded with CAREFULLY CALCULATED DAILY BUT INVOICED MONTHLY INTEREST?
FIND OUT, IN KANSAS CITY! WHICH IS IN MISSOURI! FOR SOME REASON!
Thanks for subscribing to America Facts™!
It's in both (two separate cities across the border from each other), the good one is just in Missouri. It's named after the Kansas river which is named after the Kanza people and Kansas, Missouri became Kansas City, Missouri later to avoid confusion with the State of Kansas.
Kansas City, Kansas was trying to steal the aura of KCMO.
This has been America Facts™!
Kansas City, Kansas is also stealing the stadium location of the Kansas City Chiefs, who currently play their games in Kansas City, Missouri. Which, when it comes to American football stadium theft, isn't as bad as what happened to San Francisco (Santa Clara), New York (East Rutherford, New Jersey), Chicago (Hammond, Indiana), or Oakland (Las Vegas, Nevada).
This has been America Facts: Sports Edition*
*Trademark pending
America Facts™
When someone cuts in on your business, you get to sue them! Or, depending on your cultural tradition and said culture's history of organized crime call some of the "family" down from Chicago to handle a few things. Sure would be bad if something were to happen to that shiny new logo you got going on there...
/Kidding of course, please continue America Facts, Sports Edition and send me a quarter each time.
Gasp someone else who knows KC's naming story! As a former longtime resident of KCMO, I've had to explain so many times...
My dad's family lived in Gladstone growing up and his mom's family came from Kansas so, I know a lot. (I've played in Happy Rock Park as a kid)
I personally would love more American anthropology as the tournament goes on. As the final will be held in the lands of the King of Kings Zohran Mamdani (but not really, the stadium is in New Jersey I think), us outsiders will need to know the proper gifts and tributes to bring to this mighty tyrant.
France and Spain are playing their final in Arlington (??? the cementary in sad war movies?), and the winners of Norway-England and Argentina-Switzerland will be playing in the fabled city of Atlanta (home of the historic texts of the golden age of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, for presumably tax reasons).
Please let us know if there's a Patreon for America Facts™!
Mayor Mamdani ( his first name is Mayor) can be appeased by just being good people to each other and celebrating the great city of New York.... Which as you noted you won't technically be in. Which is fine! This stadium was the Ur example of "you cannot walk to the Men's World Cup venues" on Tiktok. Don't do it. It's technically probably possible. You might die. Don't do it.
America Fact ™
All of these stadiums are normally branded, going by entirely different names during the Men's World Cup thanks to FIFA being really opposed to advertising that it can't get a cut of. The New York New Jersey Stadium is not a thing otherwise but you're not allowed to know its true name. Much like a fae.
Arlington, Texas isn't the same as Arlington, Virginia where the National cemetery is. Arlington Texas is named for the home of Robert E Lee, the traitor. (So was the other Arlington.) Said home in Virginia was where the cemetery is today. Why name a city in Texas after a traitor's house in Virginia? This is some US civil war stuff. Slavery was involved. Better not to think about it.
America Fact™
Texas is real big, about twice the size of Germany and bigger than Ukraine. But their "don't mess with Texas" slogan is really just an anti-littering campaign. They kind of let it go to their heads. We mostly ignore them.
Atlanta's film industry peaked in 2022 but has been declining for the past few years. Probably due to the general issues in the industry more than ATL itself.
America Fact™ there are more than 70 streets with "Peachtree" in the name in Atlanta making navigating a pain in the ass. The state of Georgia, not the country, is known for its peaches. And despite the name there's no relation between the state and country. I don't hang out in the south so I don't know a bunch more.
I would never limit access to glorious knowledge.
This has been America Facts™!
I know that the US loves fireworks, especially for 4th July, but I was surprised to see footage with homemade fireworks cannon versus water cannon during a protest in Georgia. I didn’t think there was enough civil unrest, or at least not the right kind of civil unrest, for something like that.
But turns out the footage I was seeing was from the other Georgia over on that other continent, not the peaches Georgia. And also it turns out I’ve probably made similar mistakes whenever Georgia (either) makes the news, likely for years if not decades.
Ah yeah I cannot assist in Georgia (country) facts™ as I don't own that Trademark.
Generally speaking Peaches Georgia is urbanly wealthy and rurally poor with Atlanta becoming a particularly culturally relevant city.
What an odd game.
I think at this stage it's fair to say that despite wins, and getting this far, Argentina have underperformed as their wins have not been dominant or convincing.
This match was won in extra time by Alvarez and Martinez when it appeared to be heading for penalties. It'll probably be remembered for Embolo's send off for diving, which is a shame. Ndoye scoring against Argentina was something special.
Argentina finally found the juice to make the way through to one of their great historic rivals to face England in the semi.
Hey all,
As I haven't seen one yet, and because I really appreciate @JCPPhoenix's F1 weekly discussion threads, I'm making one for the latter stages of the 2026 Fifa World Cup.
I would say that as the thread creator, some of the best discussion and laughs from this World Cup where many crazy things has happened is through memes. So although Tildes doesn't allow memes or image macros or reels or TikToks as top level comments, perhaps I'll make a discussion/meme top level comment for each match and hopefully we can get a little slack to be silly.
As of the date this thread is posted, we have the following countries remaining:
🇳🇴Norway (Eliminated)😔🇨🇭Switzerland (Eliminated)🇫🇷France (Eliminated)🏴England (Eliminated)🇦🇷Argentina (Eliminated)🇪🇸Spain (CHAMPIOOOOONS!) 🏆🏆🏆
I've made the top level comment the Wikipedia article that's tracking the tournament, as that's been the best way to keep track for me. As to where to where to watch and match times in your own local location, FIFA's official website has been useful, even if the organisation as a whole has not during this tournament.
France v Spain Discussion - Semifinal 1
With only the Pyrenees holding these two Western European titans back at all times, the gloves will be off tomorrow. Unless you are a goalkeeper, then gloves are allowed and just fine.
France's attack has been amazing throughout the tournament. As has their defensive play. As has their coaching. However, Spain has a racist ex-prime minister on their side, so it's anybody's game!
THAT WILL BE PLAYED. IN ARLINGTON, TEXAS. NOT THE CEMETARY WITH THE TROOPS, NOR THE ADJOINING TOWN IN VIRGINIA!
Semi final form for the two teams went in Spain's favor two years ago, so they'll be hoping to repeat that. France will obviously be wanting to correct that and reach their third consecutive final.
Spain absolutely shut the French down. They were so disciplined with their marking and every promising French service pass had a Spanish player to intercept it.
Third straight year that Spain has beaten France in a semi - Euro 24, EUFA Nations 25, and now the World Cup.
Goal number one was an impressively tactical penalty. I don't respect it, but it was well done. Goal number 2 was just flat out very impressive.
Spain is on to the final. I find it hard to muster enthusiasm, as @culturedleftfoot said, they are a team without world class players but it's working out for them very well. Champion team beats team of champions etc etc
Edit: Mbappe gave an interview about his assessment of the game, which is refreshingly frank:
I think that's a weird framing? Spain has a team that consists of world class players.
They have no big single players like Messi or Haaland, but that doesn't mean that their team is not absolute world class.
That's what I interpreted the comment to mean, yes.
By playing in the World Cup, they're obviously world-class players by definition. I didn't mean the team that is favoured to win the World Cup is shit.
I meant (and thought the original comment meant) they're not a team with multiple superstars. Their game isn't centred around an Mbappe/Messi/Haaland/Bellingham like figure - no star striker or magical midfielder.
Today's game was another Spanish game where no single player was being fed the ball or created all attacking drives from the midfield, and their win was methodical and disciplined. It's a very different style of football than relying on one lynchpin to make something happen in the attacking half of the field.
Just to re-iterate again, I don't think the team going to the final isn't world class. But if you were picking an ultimate team before the 2026 WC started, I don't imagine many people would have picked Rodri or Oyarzabal back in June.
What a strange thread you got here.
England v Argentina Discussion - Semifinal 2
The football history between these two runs deep, with the Hand of God being brought up in every discussion of ENG v ARG, including this one.
The history-history is unusually passionate, with the Falklands/Las Malvinas debate still animating figures on the right wing of politics in both countries.
With much of the world open to the idea that the tournament is rigged for Argentina, or that their fans are just so nasty they deserve to lose, England go in as the underdog favourites for once.
Both teams have had uneven performances throughout the tournament and have struggled against theoretically 'lesser' teams. The Spain that just shut down France would beat the England who went to extra time against Norway, and the Argentina that struggled with Switzerland.
But that's getting ahead of tomorrow's game - let's hope it's a good one!
AND IT'S HAPPENING IN ATLANTA WHICH I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT EXCEPT FOR DONALD GLOVER MADE A TV SHOW ABOUT IT!
The second half was the real difference maker. The spark Argentina showed, especially in the last 30 minutes, seemed impossible to stop. England were on the back foot for too long, and Messi looked ten years younger as he just created multiple opportunities.
Mac Allister got very unlucky hitting both posts with such force. I really dislike Fernandez for his history of racism and homophobia, so it was sad to see his goal break the walls of the dam.
I think England played well and I hope they don't face too much criticism when they get home. It looked like they were doing their best to stick to Tuchel's game plan, that game plan just appeared to be the wrong fit for an energetic and hungry Argentina.
I thought England were going to win, so I can only imagine how an England fan must feel.
I have been reading a lot of England 'parking the bus' and I partially agree. The goal came in at the 55th minute and the defensive positioning was late in the game. That was the tactical mistake of the TD. Momentum turned to Argentina, leaving the world's best play maker on his own and then adding more defenders late on the game. Losing the middle to Argentina, England had no legs and that's it. Instead of adding midfield players who could have maintained possession instead the complete opposite was done. Really the game lost due to TD's decision. Of course key players were a no show; Kane are you there? If I was English I would certainly be upset with this game. It was in the bag and to have ended like it did is terrible.
England is the favorite going into this match. No doubt or excuse accepted, it either wins or forever becomes a footnote in the history of the game as chokers. History means nothing on the field, England is going against the World Champion so can they do it? Based on the last game against Norway it certainly can so now they need to prove it or else…
Both teams are coming off the back of playing 30 extra minutes, so they'll both have that bit of extra wear in their legs. Messi is probably the one least feeling that, given his playing style these days (which works, don't get me wrong), but I reckon quite a few of the England runners will be feeling it.
And England managed to make it through the post-match celebrations without any more broken bones, haha!
The difference maker will need to be the 10 of ARG because Messi (as much of the GOAT status that he is, and I personally think and I like, otherwise I can't stand ARG) is a play maker. He is not developing the game, he is sit-and-wait predator; you give him space, it's over! Look at what he did to Egypt, he felt that game bc he had the strong smell of losing that game. I think the players to watch will be Julian Alvarez and Jude Belligham. The middle has been traditionally the difference maker so if ENG is able to control the middle, and strike with the right pace they should win. Again ENG is the favorite, no doubt about it. ARG is really a 10 man roster with 1 sniper waiting in the shadows. If Messi comes out and plays like he use to, ENG will be in trouble.
Messi is such a joy to watch, isn't he? He's easy to pick out padding around with his socks pulled up. I'm rooting for England, because it's been so long since they took home a trophy, although I have to say it's very hard to look past Spain given how they managed to stifle France yesterday. I don't think the England I've seen playing so far could overcome that Spain masterclass any more than the French side could.
Bellingham is special though, he's got a great eye for a goal and he's a big, imposing figure. He's not as easy to bully as Yamal, yesterday, for example. I really think we've had great and deserving teams right from the round of 16, or even earlier, to be honest. And now, these final four, they're all special teams who fought their way through thick and thin for their place. I look forward to discussions tomorrow when this second semi has played out!
<RANT Coming> OK, so I got an itch and it's called VAR! I have kept quiet etc., but I have had it. VAR is out of control. So I don't watch or follow league play as much any more, if anything on a quiet Sunday morning I'll watch whatever replay I can of Barcelona or even English league games (not any team in particular) etc., However World Cup I watch it all, I really love it. 1st came this 4 quarter game for water that I can't stand, I understand but I hate it. It can be done better, but ok. But more than that item is VAR! It was a suppose to be a tool to help a REF but they have taken over the game all together. A goal isn't a goal unless VAR approves, a foul is a foul if VAR calls it and on. What the hell is the point of the field Referee then? Let's just people watch in slow motion and make decisions of real time action. I don't like it. VAR IMO should be used if a field REF calls a play and then that decision gets review, but to call to the field Ref to call a foul I think should not be allowed. Secondly, all reviews should be done in real time, no slow motion. People make decisions on real time, not slow mo, this is a game not some critical decision making thing. Yes, will things be missed, yes, but legends are built on that. I have heard all the arguments but this VAR is ruining the game. Ok, Rant Over.
I couldn't agree more about VAR, but I have to think it's very fitting for an American World Cup, no? I wonder how casual American viewers react to all the VAR delays, given their ubiquity in their other sports.
First, thank you for agreeing with my point. Instant replay (VAR) in American sports has a different job depending on the sport it's dropped into. It’s not one universal fix. Take American football, the oldest adopter of instant replay came in during the mid-1980s. Watch a game, on TV or live, and one thing is obvious: it's slow. Commercial breaks have only made that worse. There are bursts of action, sure, but the sport's ethos was never built around uninterrupted flow. So replay doesn't really violate anything. It's just one more stoppage in a sport made of stoppages. Baseball is the closer comparison. Pace matters there too, momentum, tension, strategy, execution are the whole point, and a single blown call can be the thing everything turns on. That's what makes it worth caring about, the same way a penalty kick or a walk-off swing can flip a season in one moment. Baseball introduced replay in 2008, limited at first, expanded since, and purists still resent it. I'm a Yankees fan and I'm fine with it, the game's ethos doesn't take a hit. Baseball is already slow and deliberate by design. Replay doesn't change what the sport is, it just removes the chance that a blown call decides something big. Football is the opposite case, and this is where I actually get worked up. Football is supposed to be fast, no timeouts, no built-in breaks, 45 minutes of continuous motion per half. Referees make foul calls, players waste time, that's all part of the fabric. But the constancy itself is the point. It's why a goalkeeper picking up a back-pass gets whistled, why time-wasting gets a card, the sport polices anything that interrupts its own rhythm. VAR is a much bigger interruption than any of that. It's an external stoppage imposed on a sport whose entire identity is not stopping. That's not a minor tension, that's a direct contradiction of what makes the game the game, for me and for a lot of people who watch it the way I do. Today's Spain–France match is a good example. Mbappé picked up a yellow card that replay clearly should have overturned and didn't. It didn't change the result. But that's not really the point. The ref got it wrong, and the correction mechanism sitting right there didn't fix it. And here's the harder part of my own argument: VAR fixed that Argentina call and changed the outcome on the match with Switzerland and I'm not sure I'd want it to. Fair, no. But the universe doesn't owe anyone fairness, and neither does football. France isn't in the final. Maradona isn't a footnote. Neither outcome is fair. Both were earned in the sense that matters, inside the run of play, without an outside hand resetting the board. That's the standard the replay system needs to be held to, or it risks flattening the exact thing that makes the sport worth this much argument in the first place.
FIFA in all its corrupt glory dragged their feet for decades and when they relented they implemented a system so terribly slow and cumbersome it's hated by even the proponents of said idea.
No the current system isn't good, but the prior game that was full of fouls and flops isn't as rosy as people make it out to be today. There is absolutely no reason to allow any intentional fouling to dictate a game in the name of speed. Argentinian hands of god should be punished fully as the cheaters they are, not celebrated as some mystical play inspired from above.
Besides, Fair Play versus Speed is a false dichotomy for starters. There are similar hawk eye or VAR systems in place for other sports just as quick (or quicker) than football that still have an incredible top tier league. Hockey (the field type) for one has a working system that doesn't slow down the game and improves ref calls.
It needs improvement, not abolition. The reasons VAR was implemented in the first place will return with a vengeance.
My concern is simple, VAR for the good that it is; how it's currently being implemented is terrible for the game. It's not a question of, "can we introduce technology helpers", it's a question should we have it. If we should, to what extent? If VAR is what you want, then remove field referee, not needed. Is that too much? What is the level that would be acceptable? Introducing the whole Maradona hand of god, flopping, missed foul, wasting time etc., is to me not a good argument. It's like asking why the Medieval ages took a 1000 years to 'fix' things? If we want to fix what is 'bad' then ok, let's fix it and be done with it. The problem with improvement is that the answer inevitably is more technology introduction. Instead of adding, let's remove and start there as a premise and then let's address the 'bad'. FIFA corrupt? Hell that's a hole without a bottom. Just look at the Argentina issue going on now. I do hope that Gianni Infantino get's booted out. I fully support that, he has brought so many issues that I think needs correction. This whole Team USA issue for starters with me. I am a Team USA supporter but I have to accept the cheater name calling. It's right. We have been stained by our adorable President. Anyway, FIFA corruption, yeah that's something but it is a different issue from VAR that I hope the Europeans fix, somehow.
There's a lot of really good commentary that I agree with you on, but I strongly disagree about Mbappe's yellow card being a bad call. Mbappe allowed his frustration to influence him, and fell for the ragebait of an opponent deliberately slowing down the game. He can go for the ball, sure, but he has no business clattering into the keeper like that.
Reasonable people can disagree. Frustration shouldn't be booked. It's an emotion, what should we do, police player emotions. I used it as an example of what VAR is suppose to fix and it didn't. It didn't change the outcome of the game but imagine if it had, then what? We don't know what may happen until the fat lady sing, to use an American colloquialism. Imagine the 10 minutes of ARG vs Egypt. That may have happen in this match with France and then what? Go back and re-address a bad call? Makes no sense to me.
Frustration, an emotion, shouldn't be booked - absolutely. But physically running into the keeper should be booked. He wasn't booked for feeling frustrated, he was booked for taking out that frustration on the keeper.
I'm not an avid football fan in real life. I only watch the world cup, and maybe the euros, so I just get football in two-year doses, which is enough for me. So I genuinely don't know if VAR's interventions in this world cup are typical of how it's used in the top leagues these days. And honestly, I quite like it (although I'll whisper that opinion when I'm among football-loving friends), I find it all quite high drama. We see the ref pause, perhaps touch an ear, and we know they're hearing something. We try and read the fleeting microexpressions as both teams group up and start gesticulating madly. Then he draws out a TV in the air with his hands! Now everyone on the benches is up, the coach is either hopping or stoic, hands pocketed deep, as the ref jogs, Moses-like, through the middle of the crowds held back by the officials. Then the replay, slow speed, even slower speed, freeze frames. The pronouncement, in possibly quite broken English, the mic amplification kicking in just a few seconds too late so the ref's first few words are lost. The stadium is plunged into silence apart from one voice pronouncing doom. It's great fun.
Don't forget the yellow cards for players idiotically trying to argue with the ref about a decision made after watching a replay several times, and which he may not have even been the one to make.
How much frustration are you allowed, and what might you be permitted to do on field because of that emotional state? Can you codify this?
We should watch back the France-Paraguay game. Might need to use a couple notebooks to write down all the permitted shenanigans.
Time for my next uninformed soccer take by an American who watches a little bit of soccer every 4yrs.
Tf was England doing? Why did they not do anything? Seemed wild to get one goal and then just be like "Let's play totally defensively from here on out." Like not even wanting to get an "insurance" goal or two. Argentina kept attacking, little by little. And England held up, but it felt like it was just a matter of time...And then it happened.
And then it happened again.
Someone on reddit had a great comment. Something like. "HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF! RED COATS GET BEAT IN THE COLONIES AND GET SENT BACK HOME" lol...
It can be a bit difficult to quantify when such a monumental shift in pacing happens. Consider how both sides probably had a plan covering a person or a zone and that seemed to work well in favour of England right until the goal.
Argentinian positioning then changes, defense moves forward, midfielders assist their attackers, and suddenly England's zone or man defense is saturated and leaving gaps. It's risky for Argentina because aggression leaves room in the back, England nearly capitalized on that too, but the English defensive swap sealed the deal. They could no longer effectively defend man to man with such a crowded field nor attack in return.
That Argentinian aggression is tiring and only works if you can keep the momentum. It slowed a little until the first goal skyrocketed their morale so they could keep it up until the end.
I'd like to see Argentina lose, they're not my type of team, but that second half showed they clearly deserved this win.
One commentator on Dutch tv said that he was happy the English scaredy cat football wasn't rewarded. I agree.
I'm by no means an expert, but the relatively good commentators on my feed were saying the same thing.
They were very critical at the time of England's strategy of 'stopping playing football' (harshly worded) after the goal, and further 'parking the bus' with the defensive substitutions just before Argentina's goals.
They said such a strategy would only be workable if England's lead were greater, and if Argentina wasn't completely dominant in the second half. So the professionals (in my language) were as baffled as you are
It’s actually pretty common. Arsenal won a premier league (in)famously with this strategy last season. Often called parking the bus, or more recently haramball.
Goals are hard and although it’s ugly to watch, if you 10 goalkeepers it’s even harder.
That may be so, but it seemed clear to me that the strategy was breaking down. I expected England to go back on the offensive at some point. OK maybe save their own energy for a bit, try to wear out the Argentina players, and then start attacking again.
And I guess technically England did. With 5min left in the match and Argentina up by one.
Football is game without timeouts. It's hard for players to change their strategy up when Argentina scored so late. They held a good defense for some 30ish minutes.
It's easy to say in hindsight that the strategy was bad now that they lost. But it's also how they played against Mexico, and people praised England for their tight game in that match.
Certainly it's bad football to watch, so if it wasn't for how hated Argentina is a lot more people would be happy that haramball gets beaten.
Big difference between the games, England were up by two to start and we're down a man. Even then Mexico came close a few times to forcing extra time.
Whilst it's easy to say they should've pressed for a second, Argentina really upped their tempo in general after going 1 down. It makes sense initially that England dropped back a bit like JCPhoenix says to try and ride that out they instead ended up dropping deeper allowing Argentina to control the game.
This game was lost by the TD. The momentum changed and he did not react well at all. He put in defensive players late in the game against the world's quality offensive players. Incredible tactical decision. Midfield, forwards had no legs, completely gave up on keeping possession and decided to give the ball to Argentina. Argentina! Luckily the English goalie came out and defended well otherwise it would very well have ended with 4 or 5 goals against England. What was Tuchel thinking! Then to say that he had no regrets! Wow! The English supporters certainly have patience. I am not an English supporters but I was about to throw a brick at the tv. WTF! Players also have responsibility but overall they did their job except for Kane. Nice fellow but he should have been taken out. He was not doing anything on this game.
I can think, offhand, of 3 really good saves by Pickford, when the ball was heading towards the back of the net without his dive/punch etc. And there was a shot that hit the post pretty squarely. That's at least 4 bits of luck/skill that kept the England team in the game. A 2-1 scoreline honestly makes it sound like a closer game than it was. I gather Tuchel was screaming from the sidelines for them to get up the field, but they just couldn't. And his change putting Konsa on was him sort of resigning himself to the fact that the players weren't able to implement any sort of breaking out strategy.
TD isn't a term I've heard in relation to football before, but based on context I'm guessing it's a different one for the Manager/Head Coach?
Any chance you could confirm what it stands for and the sport most commonly using the phrase? (I'm guessing might be American football?)
TD = technical director Italy legends react as Maldini appointed technical director
In football at least, I grew up calling the 'head coach', technical director, TD for short.
Thanks! It being a regional thing caught me out.
American football would call that job a Head Coach
This World Cup's been so weird for me, as I was VERY skeptical/jaded going in, and almost entirely missed out on the usual World Cup fever. It's mostly passed me by - I've watched maybe one full match, caught only one as it was happening, and haven't even tried that hard to dodge spoilers. I didn't even look up the knockout brackets until yesterday. I've finally caught up to speed via Fox's pretty good extended highlights playlist on YouTube though and am looking forward to the last few games. I will say, the quality of the tournament has definitely been diluted by the expansion, but it's hard to argue with the drama that's been served up.
Quick takes:
Not surprised to see Brazil knocked out fairly early.
Disappointed that Japan didn't make it further, I thought they were a good dark horse and played some great football at times.
Argentina's cycle is sputtering out... they're lucky the draw was kind to them, by no means are they among the four best teams in the tournament (from what I've seen, at least). If England doesn't batter them, they don't deserve to make it to the final.
Spain is the national team I usually have a soft spot for, but I've never seen a squad rated so highly with so few world-class players. They have maybe three (Rodri, Lamine Yamal... Pedri?).
By rights the final should be France-England, and without working out the permutations before the tournament, that would have been the final I'd have thought was most merited. I have to hope England gets their dreams crushed though, we'd never hear the end of it if they won. So, allez Les Bleus!!
I'm really hoping for a FRA-ENG final, and then 5 nil to France. That would bring me great joy.
Cheers. It's only been 60 years of hurt, but whatever.
I am sorry. I try and I try but I just cannot make myself want English football fans to be happy.
Individual fans may be lovely, but they do not travel well, and they come to my country.
That’s a bit harsh but miracles happen sometimes and maybe it’s England the lucky recipient of it. I have not seen the heart of a Champion in the team but hey, I also expected FRANCE to win.
I was kidding (mostly). If England won, I'd be happy for England fans. And I also thought France would win, so who knows?
We've got Miku now, it'd be nice to hang onto that for another game or two :)
3rd Place Match - England vs France, Miami, July 18
If these teams made it to the final, the English were already going to call it Agincourt II. If you don't know the battle of Agincourt, it was England's last consequential victory in the 100 Years War before Henry V died of dysentery and his son lost all of their French conquests.
Anyway, what to call it now? What's a battle that both of them don't really want to be at, where the outcome doesn't change the overall result, where everyone's a bit wet and wants to go home.
The Battle of Ushant: Round 2! This time we're fighting in America. Plus, we might have reached the stage of internal recriminations on the England side, mirroring the two English admirals who disliked each other more than they disliked the French.
I don't really watch the third place game as a rule but I've come to really enjoy both the English and the French teams, so I'll be tuning into this one.
Welcome to America Facts™
Bienvenidos a Miami
Miami is named for the river of the same name, which is named for the Mayaimi people. (No relation to the Miami people of woodlands tribes in Illinois. Same with the recognized Miami tribe in Oklahoma who used to live in Illinois but don't now, because of the colonization.)
Did you know it was founded by a woman? I didn't!
It has the warmest winters in the US, which means mid-July is a great time to hold a game there.
This has been America Facts ™
Thank you for another amazing America Fact!
I often wondered if the history of first nations people in Florida was different from Northeastern/'Plains'/Western groups due to initial contact with the Spanish.
The Spanish had a truly odd relationship to colonization, because of their extremely legalistic culture. I've read several books about the bizarre fact that native culture persists so much more in Central and South America because, once the requirimento was read, first nations people were Spanish subjects, and could legally challenge colonizer actions in courts in Spain.
Obviously the dice were massively stacked against them, but it is an interesting fragment of history.
For Florida, though, this didn't seem to make much of a difference. Infectious diseases and policies of extermination by English colonists to the north of Florida meant that most of the first nations peoples encountered in the 17th century were gone as coherent polities by the 18th.
Of the two 'federally recognized' tribes in Florida (?), both are noteworthy. The Seminole people came together and created a shared identity from many of the remnants of groups that were wiped out by disease and genocide by the English/US colonists. Florida had been a place of refugee for escaped slaves for decades before the American revolution, and the Seminole people mixed material culture and lifeways, incorporating aspects of Gullah culture. This pissed off Andrew Jackson so badly he launched a war of extermination on the Seminole, ending up with many being forcibly marched to Oklahoma in the trail of tears.
In more recent news, a coalition of environmental groups hoping to protect the Florida Everglades and the Miccousukee people of Florida caused the closure of the so-called Alligator Alcatraz concentration camp, successfully arguing in court that the proximity of their villages close to the camp meant its building was illegal. This coalition was successful, with Miccosukee spokespeople stating that:
Perhaps not cheerful facts, but very illustrative of Florida's complex society and history that defies the easy memes of 'Florida man' etc. And special shout out to the Florida panther, my personal favourite North American big cat.
I'm a fan of the cougar (Tupi in origin) by her many, many names as well. And her screaming! I don't care if they're Florida panthers, mountain lions, catamounts, gol (Tehuelche), grey ghosts, shunta-haska (Mandans), night crier, deer tiger, puma (Quechua), mountain devil, silver lion, Erielhonan (Lake Erie tribes), sneak cat, swamp screamer, çuçuarana (Portuguese from Tupi), and the one you say when you meet them in person "oh shit, shit shit shit shit aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaugh"... I love them.
This has been Mitzli Facts ℠ (Aztec)
The Mayaimi appear to have been the victims of raids by other indigenous tribes, and the survivors may have gone to Cuba. (Not accounting for the mass casualties from disease in the Americas) I did not dig too deep, as I need some positivity still and researching Native histories is far less joyful and names for a Puma concolor.
I had no idea they had so many awesome names!
Erielhonan is a great name for my next sneaky grey cat. Aka Night Crier (I am hungry), aka Swamp Screamer (I am hungry in a swamp)
Yeah, it's probably going to be a pretty boring game, since no one really cares about the third place and it's too hot to play anyway.
Prediction: France scores at some point due to a penalty, England crumbles like a dry cookie, lots of tired ball possession gameplay and passing ensues, and France scores again cause Olise wants his goal. France 2 - England 0, allez les bleus.
(Disclaimer: I'm usually wrong.)
Well, I got basically everything right, except the game was not boring at all, but very entertaining, and well, the French didn't score first, no, Declan Rice did for England, and then the English team didn't crumble, nay, it was the French who fell apart and played really miserableus, and because of this Olise didn't score and instead Konsa and Saka and Saka did again, so my 2:0 was slightly off and ended up being a 0:4. And that was only the first half.
The second half wasn't exactly boring either when France suddenly woke up, looked really scary and scored four wonderful goals, while England got the penalty I envisioned for France, and then Bellingham scored another goal, so we got a 4:6 for the English who end up with the deserved third place.
But the rest was exactly as I predicted: both teams kicked a ball.
Nah, seriously: in the first half that was probably the best England and the worst France I've ever seen. Totally unexpected (for me), and in the end well played by both teams. Definitely the most entertaining game of this world cup.
Also really nice for Deschamps that his last game didn't end up as the complete trainwreck that the first half was.
e: also Olise must be cursed.
That was an insane game and I was thinking about your prediction after the first two goals! 😂
Really felt like the French were treating it as a kick around until the second goal, and then the momentum just ran away.
That was less the Battle of Ushant than it was the Battle of the Nile. The second half was really fun, seeing France come roaring back. I very much wanted some extra time but seeing Bellingham subbed on to cap an incredible tournament by him was nearly as good.
I kept wondering if this victory would make things better or worse for English fans in the post-mortem. Tuchel has tried to explain that, versus Argentina, his team got into such a defensive mindset that he couldn't shake them out of it. His rationale for the centre-back subs was 'if they're going to play defensive, I may as well put good defenders in there.'
But if I was an England fan, seeing Saka score a hat-trick and Rice creating so many opportunities for his playing time, I would think this was a team that could beat Spain. A decisive 2-0 loss might have been psychologically easier to take.
What a fun game.
I'm glad the French decided that it's worth playing in the second half. Because that got crazy and actually entertaining. Like I get it's a third place consolation prize. But it's still a match on the world stage. Yeah, fine, you don't have to play like it's the final match of the WC, for all the marbles. But be entertaining! And once the French got back in the second half, we got a fun match. Was France was gonna rally back? Oh boy!
It's OK that defense kinda took a backseat this time around. At least no one parked the bus this time!
Yes, losing is fine, and I understand playing half of a B-team to get them some minutes on the big stage. But 4-0 would just be humiliating, and this France team deserve so much better than to end on such a defeat. They've been great to watch this tournament. Mbappe has looked so dangerous so often, as have many, many other players from that squad. I'm glad they came back and rattled England.
Saka is so, so good. He's such a worker, will be up and down the wing and has been involved in so many of England's good plays. I've had a soft spot for him ever since he stepped up at a pretty young age (19!) to take a penalty in a euro final in 2020 and missed it. He looked crushed, and was crying, and knew (correctly, unfortunately) that he was going to be on the receiving end of a lot of hate, because football fans love to love their players, but I think they might love to hate them even more. I think the mental fortitude to come back from that kind of thing, while something that athletes just have to do, is very admirable. I don't know him, or follow him on social media, so I don't know, I hope he's not an arse in real life - he's always struck me as a pretty gracious guy. Clean player, bags of talent.
I don't watch a lot of soccer. World Cup is about as much as I watch (and I haven't even watched that much of this WC). But even to someone like me, Embolo's dive during the ARGvSUI game was so ridiculously obvious (to a viewer; clearly not to the ref because of what happened next).
I'm playing a game, and had the match up on another screen. I kinda looked over as that unfolded and even I was like, "What? No one even touched the Swiss player...Come on, get up..."
Then the Argentine player got the yellow and even I was like "What? Really?" Then VAR was called. And the yellow was reversed and given to Embolo for such an egregious dive, which turned it into a red since he already had a yellow.
That one dumb flop, to me, sealed it for the Swiss. One man down and constantly on the backfoot for the next 40+ min, through ET, until Argentina scored again. Twice even. Maybe it would've been different for the Swiss had that not happened.
And honestly? Argentina against a Swiss team of 10 men and it took them til second half of ET for them to clinch it? Either Swiss defense was amazing or Argentina just wasn't on it. Maybe it really would've been a different ending if the Swiss had all 11 the whole time.
Idk how the next match will end up. Either way, bring on the Falklands Wars 2: World Cup Boogaloo!
EDIT: Wish I lived in KC still. I imagine the parties tonight must be insane!
As a lifelong soccer fan and player, it's not that easy to score even against a team with a man down.
France (arguably the strongest team in the world atm) only defeated Paraguay 1-0 and it was with a penalty. It's super hard to score when all the other team does is keep its men tightly defending. Dribbling past 1 guy is already hard, put two together and it's almost impossible, which is why so many teams just try crosses until something happens.
Switzerland defended well and it's why it took so long for Argentine to score, even though they still had a few good chances that got saved by the goalie.
But yeah, I've drawn games playing with 9 men and won playing with 10, it's the nature of the game, goals are rare.
I thought it was a pretty egregious flop, but did I think it deserved a red? No, play on. As much as I hate flopping, if you are going to start calling it you gotta call it evenly, and no other flops were treated the same way in that game. It's not helping the "Argentina is helped by the refs" narrative, and I want Messi to have a great last World Cup.
As for the Norway England game, I was rooting for Norway, but they really phoned it in in the later minutes, and that's been punished hard this world cup. I wonder if slowing down too much in the heat lets the exhaustion build too much, but they were not attacking nearly enough to win that game.
It wasn't a red though, it was a yellow. A yellow card is the punishment for simulating and no one even touched him.
And if you let the fact that a second yellow = a red deter you from giving a yellow then it defeats the purpose of having that system
Agreed, but the initial yellow card was not given for the fake, cause a lot of players were flopping. The yellow was given for a fake tackle that didn't happen, then was forced by the rules of the book to be given for the flop. Don't get me wrong, Id rather start yellow carding a lot of these flops, cause it's just bad soccer to me. Especially after the Netherlands Morocco game, where one or two players played through bleeding scalp wounds. That was a mark of courage and grit right there.
But at the same time, it's still the Swiss players fault, doubly so. First for the egregious tackle that got him the first yellow, and then for flopping the second time. It is what it is.
Oh I agree I hate the flops and it's one of the reasons why the Men's World Cup is secondary to the Women's World Cup for me. (Also because I flat out think it's better).
Agreed. I think the most in person soccer games I have been to are women's college games, as there isn't a major club near me. Those women are badass.
Agreed. It would be nice if more countries had national play pay equity, but I think women's football is far better.
Fifa could do more too. I mean I have low expectations but they could do more.
It's also why it'll always be the Men's World Cup, not the World Cup. (And I know it could specify FIFA but in context)
I disagree, it’s not better or worse. Different, maybe. Women sports in general don’t get the respect but that’s a different point. In terms of football, women’s football has gotten better, initially it wasn’t great. Something similar to women’s basketball in terms of physical contact allowance and referees out of touch. Today’s football women matches are better, less physical contact allowance and incredible talent that has made the game better. Is it the same as men’s football game, I think so but that’s my opinion.
I think it's better than the men's game and will probably not change that until the men stop getting nominated for Emmy's. I don't find the NBA entertaining either. I don't watch the WNBA regularly but enjoy when I do. I just don't follow sports teams much. Mostly I hate the toxicity of men's leagues and love the inclusiveness of the women's leagues.
It's an opinion so there's not really a debate. But the Men's World Cup is the worse one IMO.
We're lucky it's July, and not August.
As even foreigners know, August, in Kansas City...
I can’t say I have been in KC in August but I think FIFA is probably going to move the games to December. Thoughts?
how much gloating we going to get then, i can't wait
None from me. Sorry about the result
It was indeed a game of two halves. Never has the phrase been truer
You should have a hell of a team in four years' time, at least. This generation of players should grow from this and come back stronger.
Also, call me old-fashioned but winning the World Cup is wasted on a foreign coach. I don't know that I'd ever want to see it happen, it could never mean as much to them as the people of the country.
Int'l TD in what are Tier 1 football countries like England makes no sense at all. Brasil just like England TDs. There should be quality TDs in-house otherwise it's a loss all around. You can have all the quality players in the world but having a TD that isn't part of the fabric of the country then to me is a gap. Int'l TD will play a 'professional' game which is good in club play but not in Int'l setting. I watch Brasil to see Brasil football not some European positioning and strategy. Makes no sense. Tuchel for all the bad decision that the game versus Argentina showed, it's at least English football I watched. However, I hear his interview and I am at a loss. As the English say, 'being gutted' and what I hear is a typical German response. No knock on German football or country but his respose is typical of a German person speaking and responding. It works for them, but not what I expect from an English TD. Conversely, countries like the USA, it works having Int'l TDs though US Soccer seem hell bent on ruining their experience and knowledge.
Hope you had fun with the match today! What a show from England, that was some of the most fun football I've seen, even if it wasn't consequential in the tournament.
So many epic moments. Anyone who says the England squad are bad is a fool.