The "surprising number" is less than 3%. I frankly expected much higher (so, okay, I was surprised), and for well over a decade, I've pretty much assumed this behaviour ... basically since I quit...
The "surprising number" is less than 3%. I frankly expected much higher (so, okay, I was surprised), and for well over a decade, I've pretty much assumed this behaviour ... basically since I quit using Google search for exactly this reason.
Between 2k-10k, depending on which of their categories you look at. I can't decide if that feels like a lot. Counting the "top" 100k websites feels like it probably includes many, many sites that...
Between 2k-10k, depending on which of their categories you look at. I can't decide if that feels like a lot. Counting the "top" 100k websites feels like it probably includes many, many sites that that vast majority of people have never heard of. I'd be more interested to see what percentage of the top 100 or 500 websites have these leaky forms.
The "surprising number" is less than 3%. I frankly expected much higher (so, okay, I was surprised), and for well over a decade, I've pretty much assumed this behaviour ... basically since I quit using Google search for exactly this reason.
Between 2k-10k, depending on which of their categories you look at. I can't decide if that feels like a lot. Counting the "top" 100k websites feels like it probably includes many, many sites that that vast majority of people have never heard of. I'd be more interested to see what percentage of the top 100 or 500 websites have these leaky forms.
Also, here's the site by the authors of the study: https://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~asenol/leaky-forms/