13
votes
Google’s Taara is launching a new chip to deliver high-speed Internet with light
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- Google's Taara Hopes to Usher in a New Era of Internet Powered by Light
- Authors
- Steven Levy, Lauren Goode, Justin Ling, Sophie Charara, Paresh Dave, Scharon Harding, Ars Technica, Vittoria Elliott, Boone Ashworth, Matt Burgess, Fernanda González, Makena Kelly
- Published
- Feb 28 2025
- Word count
- 1181 words
This reporting irks me. RADIO WAVES ARE LIGHT WAVES.
So it's not visible light spectrum. So what is it? Radio? infrared? UV? Xray?
Certainly hope they're not beaming xrays as LOS network transmitters
Looks like near infrared, according to this image from this post.
Generally, "light" refers to visible light, though it can refer to all EM radiation.
But they explicitly say it's invisible light.
Point to point Microwave links are nothing new...up to 100km distances and 10GB links as well. Older ones are unwieldy, but I'm not deep in that sector.
Now if they're affordable enough for consumers to build P2P meshes OTOH, now that has potential.
I think that's a logical name for near-IR wavelength when explaining it to lay people. It's still something that's more closely associated with visible light and is easier to understand as the light that our eyes just can't quite see, whereas radio waves and x-rays are mostly seen as simply radio waves and x-rays by the uninformed.
That's how I interpreted it when I read the first sentence of your comment, so I was glad it was confirmed by em-dash.
These aren't microwaves, they're infrared, which is generally considered light.
https://archive.is/X4SVp
…
The bit I'm most confused about is the claimed application to a potential 7G. It seems like this technology is fundamentally dependent on line of sight, which it obviously won't have in the context of like a 7G phone. It makes me wonder about a lot of the claims made. Fixed connections to replace needing to lay fiber in problematic areas makes sense, but the other claims seem unclear on how they could be feasible.
It won't have LOS between the phone and the cell tower, no. But you can connect cell towers that way. Which is very important, because once you serve a few 7G connections, you'll need a fat pipe to the rest of the internet. This means fiber to every single microcell - or something like a Light Bridge.
I can see it for microcells on rooftops in the city, or for larger cells out in the country.
Yeah, looks like it’s backend network gear. This has nothing to do with the mobile devices themselves, but maybe it will be a useful component of some networks?
They do try to hype it up by speculating that it might do more someday, somehow:
But then again, why would a phone or car need more network bandwidth?
Yep, thinking that they're just trying to build hype with unrealistic speculation is where I'm at right now. I did consider that they meant they'd use it to connect the towers to each other or something, but that just didn't feel like what they were getting at unless the goal was to be intentionally misleading. My understanding of 5G for example is that it's entirely about the connection from the tower to end devices and the towers are probably connected to the Internet itself via a physical connection, probably a lot of standard fiber.