11
votes
Apple plans to force app developers using OAuth to include their sign in and encourages them to put it above rivals.
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- Apple asks developers to place its login button above Google, Facebook
- Authors
- Stephen Nellis
- Published
- Jun 5 2019
- Word count
- 518 words
I've changed the title because I thought :
were the most important parts of the article.
The statement “Apple forces developers to add their sign in” isn’t true on its own. This is misleading.
Agreed. I think where the original headline editorializes it in one misleading way, OP's headline also editorializes it in another misleading way.
It works exactly as follows: If apps support 3rd party sign in, apps need to support Sign in with Apple. The order of buttons will not cause a rejection (but hiding the sign in with apple button likely would). If you implement your own auth service, and do not offer 3rd party sign in, you are not required to implement Sign in with Apple. Sign in with Apple is API compatible with OAuth 2 and Open ID Connect on the web, and offers its own native (and quickly implemented) APIs on-device.
This is a privacy play. Where Apple does try to avoid situations to invoke the "monopoly" word, I think they feel pretty safe here. They're not forcing all users to pick Sign in with Apple all the time, they're merely forcing the option of user choice.
From what I'm reading it is true. Limited in scope to 'if you allow any OAUTH you must include our OAUTH' and 'not yet', but not false at all. Only change I would see as useful would be 'to force', rather than 'forces'.
So if I am reading this article and you all correctly, would "Apple plans to force app developers using OAUTH to include their sign in and encourages them to put it above rivals." be a sufficiently accurate title? If so, I can change it to that.
@lionirdeadman, @boltsky, @cptcobalt, @vakieh
fwiw, it's OAuth, not OAUTH.
fixed, thanks.
Yeah, I almost included that it was for those who support third-party logins but I felt it was too long that way, I thought the mention of other rivals in the second part could've given the hint but It didn't really do that. My bad.