On the one hand, US defend-or-lose IP laws are dumb as hell and at least partially motivating this, on the other hand this also smells like Apple pursuing security through ignorance.
On the one hand, US defend-or-lose IP laws are dumb as hell and at least partially motivating this, on the other hand this also smells like Apple pursuing security through ignorance.
What I find very confusing is that I don't think their profit model is "security research" at all. I heard about this company months ago, and back then—and even now—their website ostensibly...
What I find very confusing is that I don't think their profit model is "security research" at all. I heard about this company months ago, and back then—and even now—their website ostensibly advocates their tool as a kind of write-once-test-anywhere mobile device simulator for development of iOS applications.
I'm not sure why Bloomberg's article (which this article is based off) decided to lead with the security-approach because that just isn't right at all.
On the one hand, US defend-or-lose IP laws are dumb as hell and at least partially motivating this, on the other hand this also smells like Apple pursuing security through ignorance.
What I find very confusing is that I don't think their profit model is "security research" at all. I heard about this company months ago, and back then—and even now—their website ostensibly advocates their tool as a kind of write-once-test-anywhere mobile device simulator for development of iOS applications.
I'm not sure why Bloomberg's article (which this article is based off) decided to lead with the security-approach because that just isn't right at all.