I can edit it for you if you'd like. It's an unusual change (and I'd have to do it manually, but it's not difficult), but would you like me to turn the other one into a text post so you can put...
I can edit it for you if you'd like. It's an unusual change (and I'd have to do it manually, but it's not difficult), but would you like me to turn the other one into a text post so you can put both of the links and/or some other information in the topic itself?
That's true, but I think the discussion on both will tend to end up covering almost identical ground, so we probably might as well merge them. I'll lock/remove this one for now and convert the...
That's true, but I think the discussion on both will tend to end up covering almost identical ground, so we probably might as well merge them. I'll lock/remove this one for now and convert the other over as soon as possible (should just be a few minutes).
Hopefully he'll be able to support himself financially hereafter, and we won't hear any sad news from him. But the change is apparently for the better. The other thread showed me how the rather...
Hopefully he'll be able to support himself financially hereafter, and we won't hear any sad news from him.
But the change is apparently for the better. The other thread showed me how the rather obscure part of his conduct was unacceptable.
Good. They don't need to be tied down to someone like him. He's routinely refused to make necessary changes and, while he's contributed much to the FOSS movement, needs to be un-deified.
Good. They don't need to be tied down to someone like him. He's routinely refused to make necessary changes and, while he's contributed much to the FOSS movement, needs to be un-deified.
I can edit it for you if you'd like. It's an unusual change (and I'd have to do it manually, but it's not difficult), but would you like me to turn the other one into a text post so you can put both of the links and/or some other information in the topic itself?
That's true, but I think the discussion on both will tend to end up covering almost identical ground, so we probably might as well merge them. I'll lock/remove this one for now and convert the other over as soon as possible (should just be a few minutes).
I'm really hoping we don't see "Richard Stallman dead" over the next few months.
Hopefully he'll be able to support himself financially hereafter, and we won't hear any sad news from him.
But the change is apparently for the better. The other thread showed me how the rather obscure part of his conduct was unacceptable.
Good. They don't need to be tied down to someone like him. He's routinely refused to make necessary changes and, while he's contributed much to the FOSS movement, needs to be un-deified.