31
votes
US President Donald Trump signs executive order designed to limit the legal protections that shield social media companies from liability for the content users post on their platforms
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- Trump signs executive order targeting protections for social media platforms
- Authors
- Axios
- Word count
- 527 words
There would seem to be a bit of irony in this.
So let's get this straight. Trump posts lies, misleading statements, and inflammatory videos on Twitter every single day. Twitter can allow him and others do this because section 230 protects Twitter from being sued for content posted by users.
So now Twitter has taken a small measured step toward addressing some of the content without going all in and removing it. So Trump's reaction is to sign an order directing the FCC to remove some of the safe harbor protections section 230 provides Twitter. Which means Twitter would be more responsible for user content, which makes it more likely to take down content in the future to protect itself from civil liability.
.... Did I miss a step here??
There is an implicit step where it seems like there's is an assumption that this action had some basis in being reasonable, and isn't just a tantrum from the worst president of all time.
Making the improbable assumption that the removal of Section 230 protections actually worked, then my understanding is that it would be completely infeasible for Twitter to actually operate. Their choice would appear to be:
Section 230 was meant to deal with a series of US court rulings that put online forums in a ridiculous situation in the early 1990s. Essentially, CompuServe decided not to have any moderation, whereas Prodigy tried to have some basic content guidelines, and had moderators that removed offensive content. As a result, two court rulings held that CompuServe was not liable for content, even if it was inarguably defamatory, whereas Prodigy, in large part because they did basic things like banning expletives, were liable for everything every user wrote, including things like complex defamatory claims about an investment firm and an IPO.
Trump’s Executive Order Targets Social Media Liability Protections That Allow for His Dubious Posts
This reads like an Onion article title. So I had to go see what the Onion had to say about this...
‘I Will Not Be Censored,’ Yells Trump Chaining Himself To Phone Displaying Twitter Homepage
Basically the same.
it's actually quite simple. Trump's order takes control of the powers of censorship away from social media companies, and puts it in his own government's hands.
How do you know?
I don't think the actual order is available yet, but I'll get a link to it in here as soon as possible.Here's the official order text: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/
The general opinion overall seems to be that this order won't actually have any legal weight, but it could cause some attempts and consequences anyway. We'll really just have to wait and see.
There is a link to a draft of the executive order linked in the first paragraph of this article. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/05/leaked-trump-order-is-a-wide-ranging-attack-on-facebook-and-twitter/
Yeah, I read through the draft last night, but we really didn't know if it was exactly what they were going to go with, or if they'd end up chopping some entire sections out or even adding new ones.
I edited in a link to the official text of the order into my post now, I haven't compared it to the draft yet though.
Also reported in SMH --- i was going to post this in news -- but maybe here is enough: https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/alleging-bias-trump-signs-order-aimed-at-curbing-protections-for-social-media-giants-20200529-p54xix.html
The EFF's response: Trump Executive Order Misreads Key Law Promoting Free Expression Online and Violates the First Amendment
Mike Masnick of Techdirt's: The Two Things To Understand About Trump's Executive Order On Social Media: (1) It's A Distraction (2) It's Legally Meaningless
One more response/analysis article from today that I think is especially worth reading, from Adi Robertson at The Verge: Line by line analysis of Trump's internet censorship executive order
Forget Net Neutrality, what we needed was Social Media Neutrality.
Whoops. This should have been in response to @Omnicrola's observation of irony, and was entirely sarcastic.