33 votes

What is the prefered image hosting on tildes?

Hi,

for example, on reddit the prefered image hosting is imgur (at least, most of the non reddit hosted images are hosted on imgur).
What is the prefered hosting here?
If not yet, will we have a hosting for tildes(so that users can send images directly to tildes)?

31 comments

  1. [2]
    Deimos
    Link
    I have no intention to ever do "general" image-hosting. There might eventually be hosting for some specific purposes, like images to include on wiki pages or themes for groups, but those are...

    If not yet, will we have a hosting for tildes(so that users can send images directly to tildes)?

    I have no intention to ever do "general" image-hosting. There might eventually be hosting for some specific purposes, like images to include on wiki pages or themes for groups, but those are generally closer to hosting for "Tildes purposes", not "user purposes".

    37 votes
    1. Archimedes
      Link Parent
      Yes, please don't. That's a whole other can of worms with much more expensive hosting costs.

      Yes, please don't. That's a whole other can of worms with much more expensive hosting costs.

      4 votes
  2. [9]
    Jedi
    Link
    Imgur, despite it's problems, is still the most reliable and (when properly used) lightweight image host. So, for me at least, it's going to stay Imgur.

    Imgur, despite it's problems, is still the most reliable and (when properly used) lightweight image host. So, for me at least, it's going to stay Imgur.

    24 votes
    1. [5]
      Comment deleted by author
      Link Parent
      1. [4]
        unknown user
        Link Parent
        Sadly even with the direct link you get redirected to the crud on mobile. Edit: looks like you can force a link to the real image even on mobile:...

        Sadly even with the direct link you get redirected to the crud on mobile.

        Edit: looks like you can force a link to the real image even on mobile: https://i.imgur.com/FQkXOXp_d.png?maxwidth=9999&fidelity=high

        but without all the crap on the end you get the tiny thumbnail version...

        23 votes
        1. [3]
          Shirley
          Link Parent
          imgur's mobile experience is horrendous, even a basic wget command redirects to the web page for some ungodly reason (you need to spoof a basic desktop browser UA). Thanks for sharing the...

          imgur's mobile experience is horrendous, even a basic wget command redirects to the web page for some ungodly reason (you need to spoof a basic desktop browser UA). Thanks for sharing the ?maxwidth=9999&fidelity=high trick!

          7 votes
          1. [2]
            unknown user
            Link Parent
            (you also need to stick _d in front of the extension)

            (you also need to stick _d in front of the extension)

            5 votes
            1. Shirley
              Link Parent
              Oops yeah I missed that, thanks. Who would have thought looking at an image in 2018 would be so tedious!

              Oops yeah I missed that, thanks.

              Who would have thought looking at an image in 2018 would be so tedious!

              6 votes
    2. [4]
      lol
      Link Parent
      I honestly hate Imgur and the direction the company has gone, but until there's a decent viable alternative I'll grudgingly use it. Who knows, Imgur was a product of Reddit, maybe the Tildes...

      I honestly hate Imgur and the direction the company has gone, but until there's a decent viable alternative I'll grudgingly use it. Who knows, Imgur was a product of Reddit, maybe the Tildes community will make our own image hosting service that won't suck

      22 votes
      1. [3]
        Vadsamoht
        Link Parent
        Making such a service (and indeed, a functionally superior service in many ways) wouldn't be that hard. The hard part would be finding a server that is capable of handling both the disk space and...

        Making such a service (and indeed, a functionally superior service in many ways) wouldn't be that hard. The hard part would be finding a server that is capable of handling both the disk space and bandwidth requirements and then finding a way of paying for the same. I, too, hate the way imgur is going about things of late, but the need to be able to find a (financially) sustainable funding model is real.

        13 votes
        1. talklittle
          Link Parent
          I think people overestimate the difficulty on the funding side. Imgur was bootstrapped and profitable with around a dozen employees, before ever taking on outside investments, and before the...

          I think people overestimate the difficulty on the funding side. Imgur was bootstrapped and profitable with around a dozen employees, before ever taking on outside investments, and before the website became bloated with heavy video ads and unwanted redirects etc. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2014/04/03/imgur-raises-40-million-from-andreessen/

          11 votes
        2. lol
          Link Parent
          Oh definitely, just look at all the failed attempts to make alternatives for Youtube that have failed over the years due to that exact reason. Granted, image hosting is less intensive then video...

          Oh definitely, just look at all the failed attempts to make alternatives for Youtube that have failed over the years due to that exact reason. Granted, image hosting is less intensive then video hosting, but both need an insane amount of raw storage and bandwidth. Without an external source of income it's virtually impossible

  3. [4]
    pseudolobster
    Link
    I doubt this will happen, for a number of reasons. First of all, images are sorta low-effort content, and we want to discourage people from posting just a single image such as a meme or funny gif....

    If not yet, will we have a hosting for tildes(so that users can send images directly to tildes)?

    I doubt this will happen, for a number of reasons. First of all, images are sorta low-effort content, and we want to discourage people from posting just a single image such as a meme or funny gif. Second, the site is sustained by donations, and images take a huge amount of bandwidth. We definitely can't afford an image hosting site as it stands. And then lastly, it creates all kinds of legal issues and requires moderation. Copyrighted things, illegal things, blatantly offensive things, gore, porn, etc. It'd require a lot of people to maintain.

    18 votes
    1. [2]
      JonSilentH
      Link Parent
      I think you’re cutting off a huge section with marking images as low effort. Creative will probably disagree. Photography is huge on almost every board there is. That being said imgur works fine...

      I think you’re cutting off a huge section with marking images as low effort. Creative will probably disagree. Photography is huge on almost every board there is. That being said imgur works fine for here.

      11 votes
      1. insomnic
        Link Parent
        I think by linking to a page with more info than just a direct image link will still work better for ~Creative to provide more artist credit and detail. Every artist I know has at least something...

        I think by linking to a page with more info than just a direct image link will still work better for ~Creative to provide more artist credit and detail. Every artist I know has at least something setup to act as an online portfolio even if it's just an Instagram profile with a link to their RedBubble or Etsy store. Even an Imgur page can have info like that versus a direct image link.

        The direct image link as low-effort means to me that there is less information the people might want or need for the referenced image. Without that info it's just a "one hit" like a meme or joke image which Tildes is not wanting to setup (I can go to reddit for that if I want that).

        5 votes
    2. Gaywallet
      Link Parent
      I often find it much easier to link an image of a graph from a study, than to say "refer to figure F". I also sometimes will use infographics or other images to convey something in a more visually...

      images are sorta low-effort content

      I often find it much easier to link an image of a graph from a study, than to say "refer to figure F". I also sometimes will use infographics or other images to convey something in a more visually appealing manner than with plain text.

      5 votes
  4. [5]
    Comment deleted by author
    Link
    1. [2]
      talklittle
      Link Parent
      Do they treat images in a special way -- stripping EXIF data, maybe generating thumbnails? I know they allow serving arbitrary file uploads like .exe files so wasn't sure if images are handled...

      Do they treat images in a special way -- stripping EXIF data, maybe generating thumbnails? I know they allow serving arbitrary file uploads like .exe files so wasn't sure if images are handled differently.

      Edit: Looks like at least some EXIF tags are preserved. I can see the tool and operating system used to create the JPEG, and date of creation.

      13 votes
      1. cfabbro
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        It appears teknik does not strip any EXIF or XMP data from images, which is actually incredibly problematic from a privacy perspective. Not only can those have location and device information (as...

        It appears teknik does not strip any EXIF or XMP data from images, which is actually incredibly problematic from a privacy perspective. Not only can those have location and device information (as you pointed out) but also the complete image history and sometimes even "nondestructive edits" raw image data as well, meaning edits (such as cropping or blacking out of personal information) can be undone.

        E.g. From that JPG:

        <xmpMM:History> <rdf:Seq> <rdf:li stEvt:action="created" stEvt:instanceID="xmp.iid:cfad9486-3bd7-d74f-a311-6fb18cacb137" stEvt:when="2018-05-01T01:40:04-04:00" stEvt:softwareAgent="Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)"/> <rdf:li stEvt:action="converted" stEvt:parameters="from image/png to image/jpeg"/> <rdf:li stEvt:action="saved" stEvt:instanceID="xmp.iid:63b96134-53c5-9749-b10f-c737b47b9e14" stEvt:when="2018-05-01T01:42:34-04:00" stEvt:softwareAgent="Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)" stEvt:changed="/"/> </rdf:Seq> </xmpMM:History>

        8 votes
    2. EggplantEmoji
      Link Parent
      Is there any specific way to get an invite code or do you just have to know someone who has one?

      Is there any specific way to get an invite code or do you just have to know someone who has one?

      3 votes
    3. Neverland
      Link Parent
      Only problem with Teknik is that it seems to be blocked by some AVs and Firewalls

      Only problem with Teknik is that it seems to be blocked by some AVs and Firewalls

      2 votes
  5. [6]
    Flashynuff
    Link
    It's honestly whatever is easiest for you. I've seen people use imgur, their personal websites, and even other random sites I've never heard of. My guess is there won't be image hosting, at least...

    It's honestly whatever is easiest for you. I've seen people use imgur, their personal websites, and even other random sites I've never heard of.

    My guess is there won't be image hosting, at least not for a good while -- pictures take up a lot of storage space, and they would open tildes up to a few legal challenges to ensure nothing illegal is posted (that's not to say it's impossible, just unlikely in an early stage... look how long it took reddit to add image hosting.)

    10 votes
    1. [5]
      EscReality
      Link Parent
      Even Reddit's hosting is garbage and they had a decade to get ready for it. I would not expect or want hosting here anytime in the foreseeable future.

      Even Reddit's hosting is garbage and they had a decade to get ready for it. I would not expect or want hosting here anytime in the foreseeable future.

      13 votes
      1. Amarok
        Link Parent
        I think most of us feel the same way. Technical challenges aside, it's a legal minefield - even displaying a thumbnail on a link submission opens you up to copyright infringements. Let the rest of...

        I think most of us feel the same way. Technical challenges aside, it's a legal minefield - even displaying a thumbnail on a link submission opens you up to copyright infringements. Let the rest of the net worry about hosting images, we'll just link to whoever's doing it in the least annoying ways.

        7 votes
      2. [3]
        starchturrets
        Link Parent
        Honest question - why does everyone hate reddit's image hosting?

        Honest question - why does everyone hate reddit's image hosting?

        2 votes
        1. EscReality
          Link Parent
          because it's unreliable and loads like crap.

          because it's unreliable and loads like crap.

          7 votes
        2. musicotic
          Link Parent
          It is horrendous on mobile

          It is horrendous on mobile

          5 votes
  6. [2]
    talklittle
    Link
    ImgTC is one Imgur alternative that is aiming to be the simple image host that Imgur started out as. Granted they will add ads, video hosting, and a public gallery. The creator tested ads and...

    ImgTC is one Imgur alternative that is aiming to be the simple image host that Imgur started out as. Granted they will add ads, video hosting, and a public gallery. The creator tested ads and found them to be profitable enough to run the site. Which isn't all that surprising, since Imgur itself was bootstrapped and profitable from day one, up until they took VC funding.

    https://old.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/8ug5qm/imgur_is_going_the_way_of_photobucket_and/

    10 votes
    1. CALICO
      Link Parent
      I might have to start using this one. imgur is blocked on my work network, and I've been using ibb.co (don't love it) to host any pics here.

      I might have to start using this one.
      imgur is blocked on my work network, and I've been using ibb.co (don't love it) to host any pics here.

      4 votes
  7. EscReality
    Link
    While I haven't actually seen a topic on this yet, I would assume imgur, it's what most people use and it's usually the most stable with direct links.

    While I haven't actually seen a topic on this yet, I would assume imgur, it's what most people use and it's usually the most stable with direct links.

    5 votes
  8. clone1
    Link
    0x0.st is really convenient

    0x0.st is really convenient

    4 votes
  9. [2]
    Tenar
    Link
    I often end up using mixtape.moe, because I used to use pomf.se but then that died because it was too much work for whoever started it. But if you're looking to make a really simple uploading site...

    I often end up using mixtape.moe, because I used to use pomf.se but then that died because it was too much work for whoever started it. But if you're looking to make a really simple uploading site for you & yours then cloning pomf.se should be super doable, although with most of them you're unsure how long they'll still be up. mixtape.moe has been up for quite a while now so it seems to be fairly trusted. Although the spreadsheet linked from pomf.se on clones includes a good list of alternative image hosts that might be worth checking out.

    2 votes
    1. ssgjrie
      Link Parent
      mixtape.moe was a good solution a few months ago but now it's too slow for popular content. They stopped using a CDN (Cloudflare) because it was too expensive. It still works well, but RIP speed...

      mixtape.moe was a good solution a few months ago but now it's too slow for popular content. They stopped using a CDN (Cloudflare) because it was too expensive. It still works well, but RIP speed if a heavy image or video is popular on reddit.

      1 vote