Thanks as always, Bauke! I was thinking about asking this on GitLab (or maybe just to you and @cfabbro directly since it'll probably be mainly the two of you that care), but maybe this is a good...
Thanks as always, Bauke!
I was thinking about asking this on GitLab (or maybe just to you and @cfabbro directly since it'll probably be mainly the two of you that care), but maybe this is a good place to do it instead:
As I mentioned, I'm going to do a full pass through all the issues soon, so this is a good opportunity to move over to a better system for labeling and categorizing them. What do you think we should do differently? These are a few specific things I want to decide:
Should some of the current labels be eliminated or replaced?
Should we use the "Weight" field as complexity, or priority? And what range (1-5? 1-3?) should we use for it?
Should we do something special to try to highlight issues that might be good candidates for people that want to try contributing to the open-source code, or could a combination of priority and low complexity handle that?
Do you think we should try to label which technologies will be involved in each issue, so that people can look for python-only ones, js-only ones, etc.?
All that sounds like a good idea to me too, @deimos... although "good first issue" is a bit of a mouthful and if we're going to use weight for complexity, it's a bit redundant. The only other...
All that sounds like a good idea to me too, @deimos... although "good first issue" is a bit of a mouthful and if we're going to use weight for complexity, it's a bit redundant. The only other suggestion I can think of is adding a "meta" label too, which is something we are lacking.
Thanks as always, Bauke!
I was thinking about asking this on GitLab (or maybe just to you and @cfabbro directly since it'll probably be mainly the two of you that care), but maybe this is a good place to do it instead:
As I mentioned, I'm going to do a full pass through all the issues soon, so this is a good opportunity to move over to a better system for labeling and categorizing them. What do you think we should do differently? These are a few specific things I want to decide:
All that sounds like a good idea to me too, @deimos... although "good first issue" is a bit of a mouthful and if we're going to use weight for complexity, it's a bit redundant. The only other suggestion I can think of is adding a "meta" label too, which is something we are lacking.