34 votes

US Department of Justice suspends controversial airport search program after investigation

5 comments

  1. [5]
    skybrian
    Link
    From the article: ...

    From the article:

    Earlier this year, David (who wanted his identity concealed because his employer does business with the government) said no to a “consensual search” at the boarding gate for a flight from the Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Airport to New York City.

    David had seen the Atlanta News First Investigates report that suggested asking agents, “Am I free to go?,” or “Am I being detained?,” when confronted at airport boarding gates. David said he refused to give consent because of what he saw in the Atlanta News First Investigates YouTube video.

    A DEA task force officer said David was free to go, but agents would detain his bag. David asked multiple times if he was being detained, and then walked on the plane with his backpack.

    DEA Task Force Officer Nicholas Nimeskern followed David onto the plane and removed his bag without a warrant or probable cause. “So I pulled out my phone and started recording him,” David said. On the video, the officer can be heard saying, “I don’t care about your consent stuff,” when David repeatedly denied the agent’s requests to search his bag.

    Nothing was found inside, but David missed his flight.

    ...

    The Justice Department Inspector General reopened a decades-long investigation of the Operation Jetway program after seeing David’s video, which was first published by the non-profit Institute for Justice.

    “Without the subject, the individual, thinking to immediately use their cell phone to record the event,” said Inspector General Michael Horowitz, “in fact, we clearly wouldn’t have known about it because absent that video, there was no record of the incident.”

    33 votes
    1. [4]
      chocobean
      Link Parent
      So.....this happened to citizens enough times that Atlanta News First did an investigation. Then that video was viewed millions of times. Then they wouldn't have known or have any record if it...

      So.....this happened to citizens enough times that Atlanta News First did an investigation. Then that video was viewed millions of times. Then they wouldn't have known or have any record if it wasn't for this one time?

      Wouldn't have known or wouldn't have taken any of the many other victim's statements seriously?

      Bodycam everybody in power now.

      31 votes
      1. [3]
        xk3
        Link Parent
        Well... if police destroy evidence you need to prove that it was done "maliciously". If the bodycam was accidentally lost or the footage accidentally deleted then there's not much you can do...

        Well... if police destroy evidence you need to prove that it was done "maliciously". If the bodycam was accidentally lost or the footage accidentally deleted then there's not much you can do

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._Youngblood

        13 votes
        1. vord
          Link Parent
          "Accidentally." That's why it's important to be permitted to record anybody in a position of power at any time.

          "Accidentally."

          That's why it's important to be permitted to record anybody in a position of power at any time.

          12 votes
        2. chocobean
          Link Parent
          Good bodycam everybody in power yesterday. We have the technology to upload videos off the cams. And there should also be a heavy penalty / people go free without cam footage. But hey the entire...

          Good bodycam everybody in power yesterday. We have the technology to upload videos off the cams. And there should also be a heavy penalty / people go free without cam footage. But hey the entire thing is rotten so there's no point listing every flaw. Good accountability now, period.

          4 votes