Advanced's recent activity
-
1 vote
-
Comment on Temu faces deadline from EU over illegal product sales in ~tech
-
Small businesses continue legal battle over denied pandemic aid
5 votes -
Boeing to lay off 10% of employees as strike stalls airplane production
19 votes -
RIAA's flags latest piracy threats, sees a future for AI
6 votes -
X overtakes WeChat in spreading Chinese disinformation about the 2024 US presidential elections
23 votes -
Comment on Temu faces deadline from EU over illegal product sales in ~tech
Advanced I read your comment when you posted it and I wanted to process it before I answer back, to be honest with you, I am kind of undecided here. But for keeping the best news sources here, I would not...I read your comment when you posted it and I wanted to process it before I answer back, to be honest with you, I am kind of undecided here.
But for keeping the best news sources here, I would not post from this website anymore till any news rating agency rate their credibility or till they post an original investigation.
-
Temu faces deadline from EU over illegal product sales
10 votes -
US FBI creates token to expose crypto fraud ring
12 votes -
To make children better fact-checkers, expose them to more misinformation — with oversight
18 votes -
If Kansas schools know social media harms students, why do they use Instagram?
12 votes -
Comment on Samsung's profit apology in ~tech
Advanced Sure, I will delete this post as well to not spread misinformation here.Sure, I will delete this post as well to not spread misinformation here.
-
Twitter/X fails to act on Doppelganger-related notices
11 votes -
Google terminates Kaspersky developer account
12 votes -
X exempt from gatekeeper obligations in EU's Digital Markets Act
17 votes -
Comment on Samsung's profit apology in ~tech
Advanced Is there is a Creative Commons/Public Domain or allowed to republish article reporting into this? I am asking because I don't want to support the broken copyright system, by publishing a...Is there is a Creative Commons/Public Domain or allowed to republish article reporting into this?
I am asking because I don't want to support the broken copyright system, by publishing a copyrighted articles (with very few exceptions).
-
Comment on Samsung's profit apology in ~tech
Advanced I'd like to point out that I chose to share this article from AI because it was free of paywalls and ads, objective in its approach, and because AI-generated content is considered public domain.I'd like to point out that I chose to share this article from AI because it was free of paywalls and ads, objective in its approach, and because AI-generated content is considered public domain.
-
Facing scrutiny over global outage, cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike on track for record year of federal lobbying spending
17 votes -
‘The community is in chaos:’ WordPress.org now requires you denounce affiliation with WP Engine to log in
33 votes -
Mozart’s latest track just dropped
16 votes
I can see from your profile that you mostly use this account for commenting and that is how you approach Tildes.
The way I approach Tildes and social media in general, is when I see something interesting or noteworthy I like to share it and even discuss it if there is a interesting discussion.
Writing about the reason I shared a research paper, blog or news article here is kind of weird, for example some time ago I shared a interesting article for me by a security researcher where he investigated a bad company that published a addon which collect your data and claim to plant trees from this, I shared it because it was super interesting for me.
I have other social media account where I use them from time to time and I follow the same pattern.
I think the only place where I lurk without posting is image boards(Hard Captcha) and Reddit( I don't want to contribute there).
So in short here: you would see me posting here about things I find interesting overall.