13
votes
What if journalists covered controversial issues differently — based on how humans actually behave when they are polarized and suspicious?
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- Complicating the Narratives - The Whole Story
- Authors
- Solutions Journalism
- Published
- Jun 27 2018
- Word count
- 9871 words
Very thoughtful article, but I think ultimately these methods take time and don't generate the drama that seems to now drive media.
A lot of what's mentioned can definitely be applicable to everyday conversation though. I especially like:
Haven't read the article yet (on my read-later-list), but subject and title remind me of a related thing about media-behavior-with-predictable-effects, this Screenwipe segment on the reporting of mass shootings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2o1V4lX_g4
Very different issue, but yes. Same for suicide, coverage creates cases.
This is something I'm actually happy with, as this has definitely improved in the last few years. Pretty much everything the forensic psychologist suggested (except the bodycount) has been changed. Victims are now the focus, while killers are often unnamed in stories.
This was a great article. I am all for exploring the divide and not camping on one side or the other. I had posted an article the other day about Americans tuning out, and expounding on the complexity in any issue sounds wonderful. I hope the news outlets figure out a way to make doing so profitable.