IMO elected leaders should posses certain qualities. Even if you don't agree with their stances, you should be able to say that they are intelligent, reasoned, principled, thoughtful, etc.. This...
IMO elected leaders should posses certain qualities. Even if you don't agree with their stances, you should be able to say that they are intelligent, reasoned, principled, thoughtful, etc..
This guy can't string a coherent thought together. He is none of those things. He does not represent the best of america. I would argue he is the worst of america and even the worst of american stereotypes.
I don't care about his embarrassment or how he looks, he has shown himself to have no shame or dignity. I am deeply embarrassed to have him represent me.
It's honestly exhausting reading the transcript because of how inarticulate he is and how most of what he's saying doesn't really lead anywhere and he constantly repeats himself.
It's honestly exhausting reading the transcript because of how inarticulate he is and how most of what he's saying doesn't really lead anywhere and he constantly repeats himself.
This is so embarrassing.
How so? How it makes him or how it makes us look?
IMO elected leaders should posses certain qualities. Even if you don't agree with their stances, you should be able to say that they are intelligent, reasoned, principled, thoughtful, etc..
This guy can't string a coherent thought together. He is none of those things. He does not represent the best of america. I would argue he is the worst of america and even the worst of american stereotypes.
I don't care about his embarrassment or how he looks, he has shown himself to have no shame or dignity. I am deeply embarrassed to have him represent me.
It's honestly exhausting reading the transcript because of how inarticulate he is and how most of what he's saying doesn't really lead anywhere and he constantly repeats himself.
Here's a recording if you missed it and would like to watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi3ATmjJtp0