As I understand it ...ahem... patriot Pat Toomey blocked it because of a change that made the spending mandatory instead of discretionary with the claim that doing so would mean that the money...
As I understand it POS ...ahem... patriot Pat Toomey blocked it because of a change that made the spending mandatory instead of discretionary with the claim that doing so would mean that the money spent would go towards anything and everything necessary to spend it. Reality of course, not being the case. There was also a fix to close that alleged loophole proposed by democrats to specify that it has to be spent on related items while retaining mandatory status; Toomey blocked the amendment, proving it's not about mandatory vs discretionary in the first place.
The quick version of mandatory vs discretionary spending is this:
Discretionary spending is at the discretion of congress. This is the spending that doesn't happen every October when the two parties point fingers at one another and cause a "government shutdown" until they pull their heads out of their collective assesagree on the total amount of money for all the shit they've voted for the past year.
Mandatory is exactly what it sounds like, money that has been allocated to be spent on certain programs regardless of our sack of shit politicianselected officials doing their damn job. Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid are the two most well known mandatory spending categories, but even they aren't completely immune as the spending is mandatory, but he administration isn't.
Because, you know, if there's any spending that should be discretionary obviously it should be the spending on the healthcare of the troops that these chickenshitchickenhawk politicians send to war any time a brown person finds something our corporate masters wantsomeone needs uhh...freedom.
I agree. Looking at this bill on govtrack.us, Pat Toomey voted yea on Jun 16th, and there have been no changes made regarding spending status of these funds since, which makes his reasoning even...
I agree.
Looking at this bill on govtrack.us, POS Pat Toomey voted yea on Jun 16th, and there have been no changes made regarding spending status of these funds since, which makes his reasoning even more of a bullshit excuse.
I think Sen. Chris Murphy made a good point about the Republicans flipping on the PACT Act today as well: Video
And all of this is made worse with the way the CHIPS act has been rushed thru...
As I understand it
POS...ahem... patriot Pat Toomey blocked it because of a change that made the spending mandatory instead of discretionary with the claim that doing so would mean that the money spent would go towards anything and everything necessary to spend it. Reality of course, not being the case. There was also a fix to close that alleged loophole proposed by democrats to specify that it has to be spent on related items while retaining mandatory status; Toomey blocked the amendment, proving it's not about mandatory vs discretionary in the first place.The quick version of mandatory vs discretionary spending is this:
Discretionary spending is at the discretion of congress. This is the spending that doesn't happen every October when the two parties point fingers at one another and cause a "government shutdown" until they
pull their heads out of their collective assesagree on the total amount of money for all the shit they've voted for the past year.Mandatory is exactly what it sounds like, money that has been allocated to be spent on certain programs regardless of our
sack of shit politicianselected officials doing their damn job. Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid are the two most well known mandatory spending categories, but even they aren't completely immune as the spending is mandatory, but he administration isn't.Because, you know, if there's any spending that should be discretionary obviously it should be the spending on the healthcare of the troops that these
chickenshitchickenhawk politicians send to war any timea brown person finds something our corporate masters wantsomeone needs uhh... freedom.I agree.
Looking at this bill on govtrack.us,
POSPat Toomey voted yea on Jun 16th, and there have been no changes made regarding spending status of these funds since, which makes his reasoning even more of a bullshit excuse.I think Sen. Chris Murphy made a good point about the Republicans flipping on the PACT Act today as well: Video
And all of this is made worse with the way the CHIPS act has been rushed thru...