Yeah, I'd hope that a better option would be to agree to a property tax cut only after the facility had been up and running for 5 or 10 years, with a stipulated level of employment for the area.
Yeah, I'd hope that a better option would be to agree to a property tax cut only after the facility had been up and running for 5 or 10 years, with a stipulated level of employment for the area.
Sounds like another "FoxCon" scam.
I wonder if they can put a stipulation on the fab actually being built and operational for X number of years?
Yeah, I'd hope that a better option would be to agree to a property tax cut only after the facility had been up and running for 5 or 10 years, with a stipulated level of employment for the area.