I have to agree with the opinion that more scrutiny should have been placed on Wikimedia's Foundation in this matter. As open and relatively accurate Wikipedia can be as for aggregating an...
I have to agree with the opinion that more scrutiny should have been placed on Wikimedia's Foundation in this matter. As open and relatively accurate Wikipedia can be as for aggregating an encyclopedia with references from other source materials, more extensive vetting has to be made. In this case, Nathaniel White wrongfully being misidentified and having their likeness matched to a criminal. How would that process look? I don't know.
In reference to the Black Lives Matter section of the opinion article, I couldn't really find a correlation between the race of Nathaniel White and this matter. Is the author trying to correlate that systemic racism that exists is part of why the Wikimedia Foundation's nonchalant reaction to an individual's name being tainted?
I have to agree with the opinion that more scrutiny should have been placed on Wikimedia's Foundation in this matter. As open and relatively accurate Wikipedia can be as for aggregating an encyclopedia with references from other source materials, more extensive vetting has to be made. In this case, Nathaniel White wrongfully being misidentified and having their likeness matched to a criminal. How would that process look? I don't know.
In reference to the Black Lives Matter section of the opinion article, I couldn't really find a correlation between the race of Nathaniel White and this matter. Is the author trying to correlate that systemic racism that exists is part of why the Wikimedia Foundation's nonchalant reaction to an individual's name being tainted?