Law's recent activity

  1. Comment on Valve: Rape Day will not be released on Steam in ~games

    Law
    Link Parent
    That was a weird example to give but yes in definition it´s correct.

    That was a weird example to give but yes in definition it´s correct.

  2. Comment on Valve: Rape Day will not be released on Steam in ~games

    Law
    Link Parent
    It depends on, killing someone might be seen as "justified" or atleast understandable in some scenarios. Like games depicting wars, horror etc whereas rape always is a cruel/wicked action....

    It depends on, killing someone might be seen as "justified" or atleast understandable in some scenarios. Like games depicting wars, horror etc whereas rape always is a cruel/wicked action. Therefore a game depicting rape will in most cases be worse then a game about killing (since usually the "killing" games can justify their killing). But as you said the indiscriminate killing and senseless violence is probably just as ugly (only game I can think of is manhunter).
    TL;DR: Killing is understandable (not necessarily right depending on moral view) whereas rape is always absolute morally repulsive.

    13 votes

  3. Comment on Valve: Rape Day will not be released on Steam in ~games

    Law
    Link Parent
    I don´t really like your normative reasoning at the end. Just because the world is rotten at the moment it justifies any rotten action that might occur which I find totally wicked. If we take your...

    I don´t really like your normative reasoning at the end. Just because the world is rotten at the moment it justifies any rotten action that might occur which I find totally wicked. If we take your reasoning to the extreme we should allow any vile acts since the world already is vile. Can you see the fault in that reasoning?

    2 votes

  4. Comment on Valve: Rape Day will not be released on Steam in ~games

    Law
    Link Parent
    Disagree, per definition they are censoring the game (prohibit = "to not allow"). That it will be available elsewhere is kinda irrelevant.

    Disagree, per definition they are censoring the game (prohibit = "to not allow"). That it will be available elsewhere is kinda irrelevant.

  5. Comment on Girl Scouts sue Boy Scouts over trademark as boys welcome girls in ~finance

    Law
    Link
    To extend a service doesn´t cause a monopoly as GSOU claims. The existence of their own organisation directly contradict that statement lol. However it will marginalize GSOU, it´s quite common...

    To extend a service doesn´t cause a monopoly as GSOU claims. The existence of their own organisation directly contradict that statement lol.
    However it will marginalize GSOU, it´s quite common sense but I don´t know how that would break any law of sorts though.

    1 vote