16 votes

California, USA must triple its rate of carbon emissions reductions to reach 2030 target, report says

5 comments

  1. [4]
    scroll_lock
    Link
    Comment box Scope: summary, some personal opinion Tone: neutral Opinion: yes, demarcated as such Sarcasm/humor: none Some US states like California have specifically pledged to significantly...
    Comment box
    • Scope: summary, some personal opinion
    • Tone: neutral
    • Opinion: yes, demarcated as such
    • Sarcasm/humor: none

    Some US states like California have specifically pledged to significantly reduce their carbon emissions by 2030 (only six years away). While their goals are admirable, real-world policy and investment in a green and sustainable future has not been on-track to meet those targets on schedule.

    California Air Resources Board (CARB) data shows that the state’s yearly greenhouse gas emissions increased 3.4 percent in 2021, while an early estimate by CARB shows emissions began decreasing the following year.

    The new report said the promotion of zero-emissions vehicles (ZEVs) and buildings, as well as renewable sources of energy, must be accelerated to meet California’s goal of reducing emissions to 40 percent of 1990 levels by the end of the decade. To achieve this, the state would need to move from an average yearly reduction of roughly 1.5 percent to about 4.6 percent. However, as 2023 emissions data is not yet available, the percentage may be higher.

    Transportation emissions in California — which went up 7.4 percent from 2020 to 2021 — make up almost 40 percent of its carbon footprint. Overall emissions from heavy-duty trucks, cars and other vehicles went down more than 10 percent from 2019 to 2021, which illustrates the state’s success in reducing its biggest pollution source. Heavy-duty vehicle emissions fell 14.1 percent from 2018 to 2021.

    “To meet our upcoming target of 50% of electricity from renewable sources by 2026, we need to double the speed we are adding RPSeligible renewables to our power mix, from 4.3% per year to 8.7% per year.”

    ZEVs made up one-quarter of all new vehicle sales last year, an all-time high for the state. California also reached its 2025 ZEV onroad goal of 1.5 million in April of 2023, two years ahead of target. If the trajectory stays the same, it will meet its five million ZEV target for 2030 a year early.

    Recent government policy changes:

    A new goal for decarbonization of the power sector was adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in February 2024. It calls for a 58 percent reduction in emissions by 2035, as compared to 2020 levels. In order to achieve the goal, the state needs to lower power emissions by 6.3 percent yearly from 2021 to 2035, according to Beacon Economics — almost twice the 3.5 percent average rate from 2011 to 2021. From 2020 to 2021, there was an upward trend of 4.8 percent.

    In my opinion, California's commitments to do things like ban the production of fossil fuel-powered vehicles by 2035 has done a lot to change behavior of major manufacturers across the country. This is important because, whether or not the state is perfectly on-time with reaching its goals, their intentions are still taken seriously. The state is very serious about decarbonization considering it is one of the only ones in the union with a dedicated and powerful Air Resources Board. Its governor, legislature, and voter base support decarbonization and it has demonstrated an ability to lead the way in several industries, notably transportation.

    I also find it significant that many states tie their own environmental regulations to California's. The state has an outsized impact on American emissions for this reason. The more aggressive its actual legislation (not just imaginary targets), the more the green transition can accelerate nationwide.

    I'm not sure CA will be able to literally triple its movement toward sustainability quite this fast, but it's possible. The cost of renewable energy continues to plummet, even as the state has ended some subsidies for solar energy, and breakthroughs in battery storage technology happen frequently. Funding from Joe Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and 2021 Infrastructure Jobs and Investment Act have been recent sources of billions of dollars in green investment in California. When these investments start to pay off in the next few years, emissions in the state could drop significantly.

    9 votes
    1. [3]
      totallynotfamous
      Link Parent
      I’m sorry, but they couldn’t find any other timeframe for comparison?

      Transportation emissions in California — which went up 7.4 percent from 2020 to 2021

      I’m sorry, but they couldn’t find any other timeframe for comparison?

      7 votes
      1. ackables
        Link Parent
        The ecowatch article is just a regurgitation of this article. The original author actually had a point to including that.

        Emissions from the transportation sector—which accounts for nearly 40% of the state’s carbon footprint—increased by 7.4% from 2020 to 2021 following the easing of pandemic travel restrictions. But overall, greenhouse gas emissions from passenger cars, heavy-duty trucks, and other vehicles were more than 10% lower in 2021 compared to 2019. This shows the state is making considerable progress cutting its largest source of pollution. Emissions from heavy-duty vehicles have consistently decreased every year since 2018, resulting in a 14.1% reduction in 2021 compared to that year.

        The ecowatch article is just a regurgitation of this article. The original author actually had a point to including that.

        5 votes
      2. ackables
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        Well ideally this increase would be smaller than the decrease going into 2020 because remote workers could remain at home. This suggests that even though there was a rise in emissions after COVID...

        Well ideally this increase would be smaller than the decrease going into 2020 because remote workers could remain at home.

        Overall emissions from heavy-duty trucks, cars and other vehicles went down more than 10 percent from 2019 to 2021, which illustrates the state’s success in reducing its biggest pollution source.

        This suggests that even though there was a rise in emissions after COVID lockdowns ended, the overall trend is still towards a decrease in vehicle emissions.

        I will say that there was a definite point that could have been made using these two statistics, but the author didn't for some reason. It seems like either the editor heavily cut down the article, or the author is regurgitating from other sources without having a clear goal in mind.

        Edit: I actually found the source for all these quotes that the author took and rearranged to try and make it seem original. This article used these statistics to actually make a point.


        I wish that there was more of an emphasis on building new transit-oriented development in California when trying to solve the housing crisis. If California can abolish parking minimums for developers and require developers to pay an extra tax to fund public transit it seems like it could help solve two problems at once.

        3 votes
  2. ackables
    Link
    I found this article linked in the article posted: https://esgnews.com/california-faces-uphill-battle-to-meet-ambitious-2030-climate-goals-despite-progress-in-key-sectors/ It says largely the same...

    I found this article linked in the article posted: https://esgnews.com/california-faces-uphill-battle-to-meet-ambitious-2030-climate-goals-despite-progress-in-key-sectors/

    It says largely the same thing as the ecowatch article, but it's arranged much better. I recommend reading this is you feel like some of the statistics in the ecowatch article feel out of place.

    4 votes