-
15 votes
-
‘Historic breakthrough’: Norway’s giant oil fund dives into renewables
7 votes -
Energy secretary Rick Perry approves deal to sell nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia
9 votes -
Puerto Rico just passed a bill to require 100% renewable electricity by 2050
13 votes -
Companies organize to make it easier to buy renewable energy
5 votes -
'Coal is on the way out': Study finds fossil fuel now pricier than solar or wind
13 votes -
A battle is raging over the largest solar farm east of the Rockies
10 votes -
Even in a warmer Europe, wind and solar could still keep the lights on
5 votes -
Where will the materials for our clean energy future come from?
7 votes -
Solar farms shine a ray of hope on bees and butterflies
5 votes -
Green New Deal doesn't include nuclear. Good? Bad? What do you think?
18 votes -
On Thorium Power (and the 'hype' thereof)
I've noticed, particularly on reddit but also elsewhere on the english-speaking internet, that thorium nuclear (MSR/LFTR) power is being hyped. And I can't help but feel suspicious. It seems too...
I've noticed, particularly on reddit but also elsewhere on the english-speaking internet, that thorium nuclear (MSR/LFTR) power is being hyped. And I can't help but feel suspicious. It seems too good to be true. "burns our nuclear waste", "infinite fuel", "Absolutely safe", "Proliferation is not an issue". Stuff like that. Not gonna provide much evidence for those claims existing here, but I'll say that you can usually find them in any big thread involving energy sources and there's a few TED talks too. Coal, conventional nuclear, renewables, any of those is apparently strictly inferior and we're complete morons for not switching already. Coal apparently causes more damage through radiation than nuclear, nuclear is dirty and renewables need something... anything.. to keep them company in case we can't get enough wind/sun. (Also, batteries and hydroelectric storage don't exist.)
German wikipedia has this to say about thorium hype: "Der MSR/LFTR als Teil einer Thoriumnutzung erhält etwa seit dem Jahr 2010 insbesondere im angelsächsischen Raum starke Unterstützung verschiedener Organisationen, während Nuklear- und Energieexperten eher zurückhaltend sind. Einige dieser Befürworter halten den LFTR sogar für die Lösung fast aller Energieprobleme.[2][3][4][5] Kritiker sprechen aus unterschiedlicher Motivation heraus vom MSR- oder Thorium-Hype[6] oder sogar von Astroturfing[7]." - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%BCssigsalzreaktor - paraphrased: MSR/LFTR received strong support in english-speaking areas by various orgs, while nuclear- and energy experts are mostly silent. Some supporters regard LFTR as solution to all energy problems. For various reasons, critics call thorium hyped or even astroturfed. [citations are mostly english, for the curious]
Meanwhile, there's major problems regarding practicality, we can't estimate just how secure it is (keep in mind modern reactor concepts are all "theoretically safe" as long as you keep the human out of the loop and maintain the facility properly.) Proliferation risks of thorium fueled reactors are immense due to U233 (232-contamination doesn't make the weapon less dangerous when used, just more dangerous to handle.). Also, no serious evidence for the capability to burn nuclear waste. And decommissioning a thorium plant seems, as of now, to be just as much of a shit job as a conventional nuclear plant - if not worse.
My main question with this is: How do you view thorium power / did you notice the same trends as I did? I'm just trying to form a conclusion between the hype and a maybe cynical pessimism.
18 votes -
Scientists create liquid fuel that can store the sun's energy for up to eighteen years
15 votes -
Waste crisis looms as thousands of solar panels reach end of life
8 votes -
As US coal use drops to 1979 levels, EPA may ease rules on new coal plants
7 votes -
Lost lands? The American wilderness at risk in the Donald Trump era.
11 votes -
Qatar says it will leave OPEC and focus on natural gas
11 votes -
The week in energy: Not all oil is equal
7 votes -
Britain's largest battery is actually a lake
11 votes -
'Records falling everywhere': Australian solar panel demand goes through the roof
14 votes -
UK scientists turn coffee industry waste into electricity
7 votes -
Two years since South Australia was plunged into darkness during a statewide blackout, new light has been shed on the cost of the Tesla battery.
5 votes -
Solar panels replaced tarmac on a motorway. Here are the results.
14 votes -
Water security: The Himalayan hydro-political tug-of-war
7 votes -
Hurricane Florence, worries grow over half dozen nuclear power plants in storm's path
23 votes -
How China's giant solar farms are transforming world energy
9 votes -
Air-conditioners do great good, but at a high environmental cost
13 votes -
Scientists warn the UN of capitalism's imminent demise
16 votes -
Use of water for electricity generation triggers outcry in Mexico
5 votes -
Why Nord Stream 2 is the world’s most controversial energy project
3 votes -
The $3 Billion Plan to Turn Hoover Dam Into a Giant Battery
13 votes -
The Arctic is melting. Here’s why cooperation and diplomacy get so complicated.
7 votes -
As economics improve, solar shines in rural America
8 votes -
The troubled quest for the superconducting wind turbine
5 votes -
Deepwater Horizon disaster altered building blocks of ocean life
11 votes -
Massachussetts renewable energy bill clears Senate
8 votes -
Has anyone implemented solar technology into their home, what has been your experience - any good resources on solar technology for the home?
Does anyone have any experience with the Tesla Powerwall? I was surprised the price was relatively reasonable for what you get, but that didn't include install, materials, and all that.
12 votes -
Billions in US solar projects shelved after Trump panel tariff
8 votes -
Massive wind farm approved in central Queensland
5 votes