Rule of thumb: if someone is defending their "scientific" study by claiming, "they want to silence us! We're being cancelled!" chances are good they're full of shit. That kind of thing doesn't...
Rule of thumb: if someone is defending their "scientific" study by claiming, "they want to silence us! We're being cancelled!" chances are good they're full of shit. That kind of thing doesn't tend to impress peer reviewers.
Rule of thumb: if someone is defending their "scientific" study by claiming, "they want to silence us! We're being cancelled!" chances are good they're full of shit. That kind of thing doesn't tend to impress peer reviewers.