-
15 votes
-
Is serviceable CGI here to stay?
I'm here watching Furiosa which has noticeable CGI. So noticeable in fact that my partner, who doesn't give a second thought to the technicalities of movie making commented on it. Painted...
I'm here watching Furiosa which has noticeable CGI. So noticeable in fact that my partner, who doesn't give a second thought to the technicalities of movie making commented on it. Painted backgrounds, obvious green screen and so on.
What is also noticeable is that the movie wasn't cheap to make. It has also excellent, energetic direction, camera work and action set pieces and the character design has the same care as Mad Max Fury Road.
The movie also has this cooky, kinda goofy tone from the get go. Stylistically the CGI doesn't really get in the way because there's a real distinct step between our reality and this crazy world on screen. It serves its purpose.
So what's y'all's thoughts about this? I think with money and time (I guess they're the same thing) the movie could've looked a lot better and avoided the paintbrushly fogginess that comes with the green screen -- but would've that actually been worth it?
(There's also a lot of stunts, real handcrafted care and crazy, inspired camera movement. The movie's good, you should probably consider seeing it.)
10 votes -
"No CGI" is really just invisible CGI
47 votes -
Chatting slow mo with Zack Snyder
4 votes -
The Matrix forever changed the craft of Hollywood filmmaking
13 votes -
The Frighteners (1996) | Almost Cult Classics
4 votes -
Christopher Nolan forgot to credit over 80% of VFX crew on ‘Oppenheimer’
44 votes -
James Cameron breaks down his most iconic films
3 votes -
How Taika Waititi shoots a film at three budget levels
5 votes -
Why Dune's visual effects feel so different
11 votes -
A Computer-Generated Ballet (1965) - The first computer-generated animation of human figures in motion
5 votes -
Sonic’s live-action design upset the entire internet, so the studio is changing it
12 votes