The tl;dr from the article. Still an interesting read about the fact that the whole archive is still sitting in a locked office - just not published. I suppose obviously the feds know that raiding...
Why was only 1% of the Snowden archive published by the journalists who had full access to it? Ewen MacAskill replied: “The main reason for only a small percentage – though, given the mass of documents, 1% is still a lot – was diminishing interest.”
The tl;dr from the article. Still an interesting read about the fact that the whole archive is still sitting in a locked office - just not published. I suppose obviously the feds know that raiding a publications offices is a bad look.
I'd wager there's also the aspect of some of the documents just being a general threat to national security if published- and enough has already been revealed to get the general gist. The world...
I'd wager there's also the aspect of some of the documents just being a general threat to national security if published- and enough has already been revealed to get the general gist.
The world collectively not caring though has been disheartening. I've seen more guilt-tripping Snowden seeking refuge in the one country that'll take him rather than anger over mass surveillance.
The tl;dr from the article. Still an interesting read about the fact that the whole archive is still sitting in a locked office - just not published. I suppose obviously the feds know that raiding a publications offices is a bad look.
I'd wager there's also the aspect of some of the documents just being a general threat to national security if published- and enough has already been revealed to get the general gist.
The world collectively not caring though has been disheartening. I've seen more guilt-tripping Snowden seeking refuge in the one country that'll take him rather than anger over mass surveillance.