16 votes

White House blocks bill to protect US elections

5 comments

  1. soc
    Link
    It sure seems like the president's primary concern is to brush aside anything which acknowledges that our democracy faces external threats.

    It sure seems like the president's primary concern is to brush aside anything which acknowledges that our democracy faces external threats.

    9 votes
  2. Diet_Coke
    Link
    I have a fairly dim view of the state of democracy in the United States. It's a sham, and there's a lot of ways it could be better. However we should take any measures we can to guard against...

    I have a fairly dim view of the state of democracy in the United States. It's a sham, and there's a lot of ways it could be better. However we should take any measures we can to guard against direct manipulation of votes. For the White House's actions here to be legitimate there must be very compelling reasons not to strengthen election security in the bill. I see no reason to believe that there are any compelling reasons, and in fact this bill is being blocked to directly benefit Donald Trump. When elected representatives won't take steps to safeguard elections, what recourse is there? I feel like we're watching our institutions slip away in plain daylight.

    4 votes
  3. Fin
    Link
    Seems clear cut they want to keep power by any means necessary.

    Seems clear cut they want to keep power by any means necessary.

    3 votes
  4. [3]
    Comment removed by site admin
    Link
    1. [2]
      EscReality
      Link Parent
      The fact that they give no reason for the cancellation is shady as fuck. There is no sound reasoning for someone to ever think this is a bad idea. It seems like basic common sense and I find it...

      The fact that they give no reason for the cancellation is shady as fuck.

      A paper record could prove effective against hackers if they tried to change the reporting of votes on the internet, as opposed to altering the votes themselves. Election officials needs to be able to say, “‘Nope, we can check this,’” as Lankford puts it. “Here’s the paper, here’s the machine, here’s our poll count.”

      There is no sound reasoning for someone to ever think this is a bad idea.

      It seems like basic common sense and I find it shocking that it's not already law.

      2 votes
      1. Diet_Coke
        Link Parent
        It's because this country is run by a bunch of geriatrics that have their staff print out their emails to read them.

        It's because this country is run by a bunch of geriatrics that have their staff print out their emails to read them.

        3 votes