This article provides a reporter's first hand account of being embedded with the caravan. I guess he should've just made up stuff to satisfy your preference have having "both sides" presented to...
This article provides a reporter's first hand account of being embedded with the caravan.
I guess he should've just made up stuff to satisfy your preference have having "both sides" presented to this story. Sigh.
Sigh, the title of the article goes to great pains to include the Donald's name. I know the man is (fill in your own adjective here) I don't need to be reminded of it every other headline.
Sigh, the title of the article goes to great pains to include the Donald's name. I know the man is (fill in your own adjective here) I don't need to be reminded of it every other headline.
I'm still not sure what "both sides" of this issue might be. Donald Trump is sending troops to the border to protect our country from this scary caravan of women and children. Oh, right. The...
I'm still not sure what "both sides" of this issue might be. Donald Trump is sending troops to the border to protect our country from this scary caravan of women and children.
Oh, right. The "other side" is that Donald Trump is so desperately trying to exploit this trail of human misery for political gain.
That helps to contextualise the article: this isn't just any old caravan of migrants, it's the one that the President of the USA has been talking about so much lately.
the title of the article goes to great pains to include the Donald's name.
That helps to contextualise the article: this isn't just any old caravan of migrants, it's the one that the President of the USA has been talking about so much lately.
Not all articles need to present both sides of an issue. In fact, one might say that this article is providing the other side that has been missing from so many previous articles about this...
Not all articles need to present both sides of an issue.
In fact, one might say that this article is providing the other side that has been missing from so many previous articles about this situation.
I'll admit I haven't been following this story in a lot of depth, but all the articles I've come across have been about what President Trump said, and how other Americans have reacted to what Trump said, and what the political implications of this migrant caravan are in America. Most stories barely mention the migrants themselves, where they came from, and why they're migrating. This article addresses that oversight and shows us the other side that has been mostly missing from previous articles.
Yes, that's pretty much why I have Drudge Report and Huffington post both on my reading list. Both sides never talk to each other. However, I remember years ago reading articles in the printed...
Yes, that's pretty much why I have Drudge Report and Huffington post both on my reading list. Both sides never talk to each other.
However, I remember years ago reading articles in the printed Newseek and US News and World Report that routinely would at least attempt to cover both sides.
The Independent (UK) sent a reporter to the scary caravan of refugees in Mexico. Did not find a single Middle Easterner.
Sigh. I do so miss the day when articles at least pretended to present both sides of an issue.
This article provides a reporter's first hand account of being embedded with the caravan.
I guess he should've just made up stuff to satisfy your preference have having "both sides" presented to this story. Sigh.
Sigh, the title of the article goes to great pains to include the Donald's name. I know the man is (fill in your own adjective here) I don't need to be reminded of it every other headline.
I'm still not sure what "both sides" of this issue might be. Donald Trump is sending troops to the border to protect our country from this scary caravan of women and children.
Oh, right. The "other side" is that Donald Trump is so desperately trying to exploit this trail of human misery for political gain.
That helps to contextualise the article: this isn't just any old caravan of migrants, it's the one that the President of the USA has been talking about so much lately.
Not all articles need to present both sides of an issue.
In fact, one might say that this article is providing the other side that has been missing from so many previous articles about this situation.
I'll admit I haven't been following this story in a lot of depth, but all the articles I've come across have been about what President Trump said, and how other Americans have reacted to what Trump said, and what the political implications of this migrant caravan are in America. Most stories barely mention the migrants themselves, where they came from, and why they're migrating. This article addresses that oversight and shows us the other side that has been mostly missing from previous articles.
Yes, that's pretty much why I have Drudge Report and Huffington post both on my reading list. Both sides never talk to each other.
However, I remember years ago reading articles in the printed Newseek and US News and World Report that routinely would at least attempt to cover both sides.
What do you think was missing? Do you have a another article?
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/immigration/2018/10/26/five-barriers-honduran-caravan-immigrants-might-find-get-us-seek-asylum
https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2018/10/19/mexico-caravan-guatemala-weir-bpr-nr-vpx.cnn