For what it's worth, only 2 sentences of this article actually talk about NOAA's "fierce opposition". Here they are: Anyway, this reasoning surprised me. I thought their big issue would have been...
For what it's worth, only 2 sentences of this article actually talk about NOAA's "fierce opposition". Here they are:
However, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is fiercely opposed to the salvage mission. The agency argues in court documents that the telegraph should be left undisturbed, since it is likely to be surrounded "by the mortal remains of more than 1500 people."
Anyway, this reasoning surprised me. I thought their big issue would have been something to do with disturbing some kind of fragile ecosystem within the wreckage. Who cares about some bones from literally over a hundred years ago?
I can imagine "the descendents" is the simple answer to your question, but the NOAA opposition is baked into the judgment, it's not extant like the article title might imply.
I can imagine "the descendents" is the simple answer to your question, but the NOAA opposition is baked into the judgment, it's not extant like the article title might imply.
For what it's worth, only 2 sentences of this article actually talk about NOAA's "fierce opposition". Here they are:
Anyway, this reasoning surprised me. I thought their big issue would have been something to do with disturbing some kind of fragile ecosystem within the wreckage. Who cares about some bones from literally over a hundred years ago?
I can imagine "the descendents" is the simple answer to your question, but the NOAA opposition is baked into the judgment, it's not extant like the article title might imply.