Academic publishers face class action over ‘peer review’ pay, other restrictions
34
votes
Showing only topics in ~science with the tag "journals.academic".
Back to normal view /
Search all groups
-
-
Wiley to shutter nineteen more journals, some tainted by fraud
20 votes -
A peer reviewed journal with nonsense AI images was just published
33 votes -
Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?
8 votes -
‘Zombie papers’ just won’t die. Retracted papers by notorious fraudster still cited years later.
9 votes -
What Sci-Hub’s latest court battle means for research
11 votes -
The top scientific journal retractions of 2021
9 votes -
The rapid sharing of pandemic research shows there is a better way to filter good science from bad
7 votes -
Nature to join open-access Plan S, publisher says
10 votes -
ACM signs letter against open access publication of federally funded studies
@americanpublish: Proud to join 125+ other organizations to oppose a costly proposed Administration policy that would undermine scientific discovery, American jobs, & our global competitiveness. Read the coalition letter: https://t.co/Lm8gDO56MG @americanpublish @AmericanCancer @globalIPcenter
9 votes -
The top retractions of 2019
7 votes -
The war to free science: How librarians, pirates, and funders are liberating the world’s academic research from paywalls
17 votes -
Coca-Cola's contracts with researchers reserved the right to kill studies
15 votes -
Academic papers should be free
24 votes -
Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research – it should be free
28 votes -
Top cancer researcher fails to disclose corporate financial ties in major research journals
9 votes -
European science funders ban grantees from publishing in paywalled journals
16 votes -
State of California funded research must be public within one year
15 votes -
Capitalism is ruining science
28 votes