-
19 votes
-
Glow-in-the-dark succulents could be the future of ambient lighting
38 votes -
A new type of vaccine is needle-free and doubles as dental floss
29 votes -
Would you get sick in the name of science?
11 votes -
Online mathematics programs may benefit most the kids who need it least
22 votes -
Inside arXiv — the most transformative platform in all of science
22 votes -
When people think that protests are more likely to be met with state violence, they are more likely to view confrontational tactics as legitimate and effective
17 votes -
A comfortable life for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use
66 votes -
How do you keep up with the research in your field?
Do you have a weekly or daily routine? A preferred application? For context, I’m an ecologist that focuses on statistics and modeling and I work in a few different ecosystems. I’ve always...
Do you have a weekly or daily routine? A preferred application?
For context, I’m an ecologist that focuses on statistics and modeling and I work in a few different ecosystems. I’ve always struggled to feel like I have a good understanding of the literature and I think there are a few main reasons.
- Quantity: It’s overwhelming. There is so. Much. Research. And there’s more literally every day that is or might be relevant.
- Sources: Relatedly, there are so many journals to try to keep up with. And certainly more that I should be keeping up with that I’m not even aware of.
- Method: I haven’t found an interface that really works for me. I end up ignoring emails with journal table of contents. Scrolling through RSS feeds on Zotero or Mendeley is awful. Going to the journal websites is even worse.
- Scheduling: I block out time in my calendar, but there’s always something else I’d rather work on. It’s hard to force myself to focus on it.
- Workflow: The exploration-exploitation trade off. If I skim through all the titles of a bunch of different journals, I end up just spending the whole time downloading papers which then sit in my Zotero library without getting read. If I stop to look in more detail, I don’t get through much of the article list.
- Retention: It’s hard to read something over and really retain it. I’ve taken notes (digitally and on paper) but that adds to the time it takes to skim titles and abstracts, which reduces the number I can cover.
One of the downsides of everything being digital is that I also find it harder to skim an article and get the gist of it. Flipping through a magazine lets you skim the titles and figures to easily get the main idea. Online, I need to read the title, click in a new tab if it seems interesting, scroll around to skim the abstract, and scroll and/or click to the figures. Flipping back and forth to the abstract or different sections is also harder.
What I’d really like is something kind of like a forum or link aggregator where I could skim titles and click an expander to view the abstract and figures.
16 votes -
Norway has launched a new scheme to lure top international researchers amid growing pressure on academic freedom in the US
11 votes -
Sci-Net: A new social network platform to request and share research articles
24 votes -
Those dire wolves aren’t an amazing scientific breakthrough. They’re a disturbing symbol of where we’re heading.
35 votes -
How population stratification led to a decade of sensationally false genetic findings
15 votes -
Scientists have bred "Woolly Mice" on their journey to bring back the mammoth
40 votes -
Mean World Syndrome - moderate to heavy exposure to violence-related content in mass media may cause people to perceive the world to be more dangerous than it is
36 votes -
Revisiting stereotype threat
6 votes -
‘Unprecedented risk’ to life on Earth: Scientists call for halt on ‘mirror life’ microbe research
55 votes -
The Business-School research scandal that just keeps getting bigger
11 votes -
Turtle genomes fold in a special way
6 votes -
Better know a bird: The wild and kinky mating rituals of the crested auklet
16 votes -
Giant rats in tiny vests trained to sniff out illegally trafficked wildlife
21 votes -
Botanists identify thirty-three global ‘dark spots’ with thousands of unknown plants
16 votes -
Scores of papers by Eliezer Masliah, prominent US neuroscientist and top National Institutes of Health official, fall under suspicion
25 votes -
Scientific rigor proponents retract paper on benefits of scientific rigor
13 votes -
Scientists receive Ig Nobel Prize for discovering mammals can breathe through anuses
43 votes -
The Marshmallow Test and other predictors of success have bias built in, researchers say
28 votes -
Scientists research man missing 90% of his brain who leads a normal life
27 votes -
Does anyone have experience working as an independent researcher?
Ive been working in engineering for a few years now. Ive gotten pretty good at my job, and Ive learned a lot. But it was never really my intention to work at a big corporation my whole life. When...
Ive been working in engineering for a few years now. Ive gotten pretty good at my job, and Ive learned a lot. But it was never really my intention to work at a big corporation my whole life.
When I was a kid, on TV there were all these scientists and researchers who just had money to do research somehow. They didnt go to an office or go to meetings, they just had funding somehow to go do science stuff. There was often a big lab built right into their home so they could just wake up and tinker around with stuff. That was the dream for me growing up.
I could always just keep working where I am now, but I cant really do the kind of research I want within the normal structured environment that big companies want me to work in. I want to work on a difficult problem that I would expect to take years of experimentation before I would even hope of making any big breakthroughs.
Im wondering if anyone here has ever done any kind of work as an independent researcher. Like, living off grant money or something like that. Ive been looking at SBIR/STTR grants as a possible first step, but that would only get me 3 years, and after that Id need to find a continued income source.
17 votes -
Engineers develop a recipe for zero-emissions fuel: soda cans (aluminium), seawater and caffeine
34 votes -
Maglev titanium heart now whirs inside the chest of a live patient
24 votes -
Why don’t we know how antidepressants work yet?
30 votes -
Genomic prediction of IQ is modern snake oil
11 votes -
How AI revolutionized protein science, but didn’t end it
16 votes -
For many Olympic medalists, silver stings more than bronze
14 votes -
Elephants call each other by name, study finds
35 votes -
Male birth control gel (that is applied to the shoulders) is safe and effective, new trial findings show
72 votes -
Internet addiction affects the behavior and development of adolescents
8 votes -
Why the pandemic probably started in a lab, in five key points
44 votes -
Frozen human brain tissue was successfully revived for the first time
34 votes -
UNM researchers find microplastics in canine and human testicular tissue
23 votes -
How much research is being written by large language models?
14 votes -
Wiley to shutter nineteen more journals, some tainted by fraud
20 votes -
New candidate genes for human male infertility found by analyzing gorillas' unusual reproductive system
7 votes -
mRNA cancer vaccine reprograms immune system to tackle glioblastoma
12 votes -
What cats’ love of boxes and squares can tell us about their visual perception
30 votes -
The Homo Economicus as a prototype of a psychopath? A conceptual analysis and implications for business research and teaching.
6 votes -
‘Like a film in my mind’: hyperphantasia and the quest to understand vivid imaginations
18 votes -
Canadian science gets biggest boost to PhD and postdoc pay in twenty years
7 votes -
Loneliness can kill, and new research shows middle-aged Americans are particularly vulnerable
31 votes -
Scientists studied how cicadas pee. Their insights could shed light on fluid dynamics.
7 votes