There's a lot of interesting data that is beautifully visualized in MIT's tool. Here's a sample of one page covering the state of New York: https://elections.mit.edu/#state-NY Click around. It's...
There's a lot of interesting data that is beautifully visualized in MIT's tool.
Here's a link to the methodology: https://elections.mit.edu/2016-epi-methodology.pdf Doesn't appear so. I don't think primary data would be as easily accessible as official election data. Though,...
Doesn't appear so. I don't think primary data would be as easily accessible as official election data. Though, I think they may have used some of the information in their ranking.
Yeah, I saw that it included midterms. I was really curious to see how what turnouts were like from the primaries to the general to see if there was a higher turnout for the primaries. It wouldn't...
Yeah, I saw that it included midterms. I was really curious to see how what turnouts were like from the primaries to the general to see if there was a higher turnout for the primaries. It wouldn't surprise me one bit.
There's a lot of interesting data that is beautifully visualized in MIT's tool.
Here's a sample of one page covering the state of New York: https://elections.mit.edu/#state-NY
Click around. It's impressive.
It really is an impressive site. Any idea if this includes primary elections?
Here's a link to the methodology: https://elections.mit.edu/2016-epi-methodology.pdf
Doesn't appear so. I don't think primary data would be as easily accessible as official election data. Though, I think they may have used some of the information in their ranking.
On the description of the site (https://elections.mit.edu/) they say:
As an side, the source code and data is here: https://github.com/MEDSL/elections-performance-index
Yeah, I saw that it included midterms. I was really curious to see how what turnouts were like from the primaries to the general to see if there was a higher turnout for the primaries. It wouldn't surprise me one bit.