-
11 votes
-
Sweden halts adoptions from South Korea after claims of falsified papers on origins of children
10 votes -
Not your grandma’s granny flat: How San Diego hacked state housing law to build ADU ‘apartment buildings’
16 votes -
US Supreme Court, under pressure, issues non-binding ethics code for justices, without mechanisms for enforcement
48 votes -
Norway's government risks crisis over a contentious package of EU energy bills
5 votes -
Leonard Leo: The man behind the Republican US Supreme Court majority
24 votes -
California public school students will learn about labor rights under first-of-its-kind law
44 votes -
New developments in US antitrust enforcement - more and new types of cases brought under Joe Biden, new leaders at the Federal Trade Commission
14 votes -
Professionals in Sweden are pushing back hard against a rightwing plan to make them snitch on undocumented migrants
23 votes -
Why the US left's version of the Federalist Society failed
16 votes -
Opinion: Why a Navajo leader’s federal conviction gives US prosecutors a road map to take on former president Donald Trump
15 votes -
US Supreme Court accepts case challenging Donald Trump's eligibility to run for president based on the 14th amendment and the January 6 capitol riot
60 votes -
French satirical newspaper 'Charlie Hebdo' blasts proposed Danish blasphemy law
38 votes -
A proposed law to ban caste discrimination in California has touched a nerve, led to controversy
41 votes -
Interactive tool infographic shows antiprotest bills and laws in the United States
11 votes -
Opinion - Antonin Scalia was wrong about the meaning of ‘bear arms’ (2018)
33 votes -
Analysis: Defendant Mark Meadows testifies in hearing on whether to remove Georgia election trial to federal court
7 votes -
US President Joe Biden is still trying to forgive student debt in ‘a very direct confrontation’ with US Supreme Court, expert says
59 votes -
US federal judge to hear arguments on Mark Meadows’ request to move Georgia election case from state court to federal court
12 votes -
A right-wing sheriffs group that challenges federal law is gaining acceptance across many regions of the US
58 votes -
Two prominent conservative law professors write article arguing Donald Trump ineligible to run for US President under 14th amendment
72 votes -
Was Merrick Garland’s approach correct all along?
20 votes -
Laurence Tribe dissects alleged Donald Trump co-conspirator Kenneth Chesebro's misrepresentation of Laurence Tribe's writing to support the false US elector scheme and January 6
10 votes -
US President Joe Biden's IRA shuts Africa out of critical minerals supply chains
6 votes -
"Blood on your hands" - The legal dimension of metaphors in the case of Zooey Zephyr
7 votes -
US President Joe Biden signs historic order moving prosecution of US military sexual assault outside chain of command
133 votes -
Israel’s top court will hear challenges to a new law that weakens its power, the law has sparked large protests
10 votes -
How and why the work of John Hart Ely a liberal scholar, profoundly influenced the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v Wade re abortion rights in the US
5 votes -
US Supreme Court rules 5-4 against Navajo Nation, stating that United States has no "duty" to "supply tribes with adequate water"
73 votes -
Sweden's Supreme Court approves the extradition of a supporter of the Kurdistan Workers' Party to Turkey, ahead of NATO membership talks with Ankara
8 votes -
Trendy neighbourhood in Copenhagen bracing for major protests over anti-ghetto law – critics say it's racist and pushing out remaining social housing
5 votes -
US Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed
17 votes -
Child labor laws are under attack in states across the country
9 votes -
The invasion of Iraq was a turning point on to a path that led towards Ukraine
9 votes -
Sanna Marin's human rights legislation for indigenous Sámi fails – Sámi Parliament Act failed to get past the final committee stage in Finnish parliament
3 votes -
Why most gun laws aren’t backed up by evidence
7 votes -
BBC offices in India raided by tax officials amid Narendra Modi documentary fallout
9 votes -
Amsterdam bans cannabis in its red light district
16 votes -
New Jersey requiring students to learn 'media literacy' to fight 'disinformation'
15 votes -
Congress passes law banning non-disclosure agreements in sexual harassment cases
14 votes -
Supreme court rules against Scottish parliament holding new independence referendum
9 votes -
Sanna Marin's Finnish government could collapse, as human rights laws stalled – new Sámi Parliament Act is the right of self-determination
6 votes -
Germany plans to legalise recreational cannabis
10 votes -
Regardless of the outcome of the November 1 polls, Denmark is expected to maintain its restrictive immigration policies
2 votes -
How to make class action lawsuits more meaningful to the public
Have you ever received notice that you might be eligible for something from a class-action settlement? Ever notice that the effort required to recover is significant, and the recovery perhaps...
Have you ever received notice that you might be eligible for something from a class-action settlement? Ever notice that the effort required to recover is significant, and the recovery perhaps insultingly miniscule?
I don't know of any data, but I suspect that's true of nearly every class action lawsuit, even those that win in court battles. Maybe the original plaintiffs get a decent recovery, sometimes there's injunctive relief (which means the court forces the defendant to do or not do something). Every once in a while, individual members of the class get a meaningful outcome (vw's dieselgate comes to mind).
The public interest justification for the outcomes where the recover for class members is really small, if one is even ever really offered, is that the cost of the action to the defendant serves as an inducement to all defendants to keep their act together. But see, Tyler Durden's explanation of the actuarial function from Fight Club.
My thought is that instead of any recovery for the individual class members ("fuck 'em, right?"), their portion of the money should go to a public interest fund dedicated to consumer protection. My reason for this is that these small recoveries don't make any useful change for the individual class member consumers. But collectively, might add up to enough to make a meaningful difference to the future activities of producers.
Of course, all the usual caveats about corruption and accountability come into play. But there's a few reasons it might help, if those can be overcome. First, it might prompt faster, lest costly settlements. The payouts would be lower, and also the transaction costs. This shifts the litigation process from focussing on big recoveries to high volume of suits, bringing in more defendants. It would also enable smaller firms to bring suit, the hope being that smaller firms would take on more marginal cases and get more action.
Second, it might actually create a feedback loop. If the fund gets large enough, it could lobby and investigate, providing more information more new suits, and identifying the worst actors, and encouraging useful regulation. Imagine if Consumers Union could return to its glory of the 80's and have a big lobbying fund?
Or, we could just have decent government level consumer protections (hahhahahahahahahah!)
9 votes -
Denmark's former foreign intelligence chief has been formally charged with leaking highly classified information
8 votes -
Recordings within eight feet of police illegal in Arizona under bill signed into law by Doug Ducey
20 votes -
Minnesota lawmakers voted to legalize THC edibles. Some did it accidentally.
12 votes -
California lawmakers reject ballot proposal that aimed to end forced prison labor
10 votes -
The conservative Supreme Court's favorite judicial philosophy requires a very, very firm grasp of history — one that none of the justices seem to possess
16 votes