How to make class action lawsuits more meaningful to the public
Have you ever received notice that you might be eligible for something from a class-action settlement? Ever notice that the effort required to recover is significant, and the recovery perhaps insultingly miniscule?
I don't know of any data, but I suspect that's true of nearly every class action lawsuit, even those that win in court battles. Maybe the original plaintiffs get a decent recovery, sometimes there's injunctive relief (which means the court forces the defendant to do or not do something). Every once in a while, individual members of the class get a meaningful outcome (vw's dieselgate comes to mind).
The public interest justification for the outcomes where the recover for class members is really small, if one is even ever really offered, is that the cost of the action to the defendant serves as an inducement to all defendants to keep their act together. But see, Tyler Durden's explanation of the actuarial function from Fight Club.
My thought is that instead of any recovery for the individual class members ("fuck 'em, right?"), their portion of the money should go to a public interest fund dedicated to consumer protection. My reason for this is that these small recoveries don't make any useful change for the individual class member consumers. But collectively, might add up to enough to make a meaningful difference to the future activities of producers.
Of course, all the usual caveats about corruption and accountability come into play. But there's a few reasons it might help, if those can be overcome. First, it might prompt faster, lest costly settlements. The payouts would be lower, and also the transaction costs. This shifts the litigation process from focussing on big recoveries to high volume of suits, bringing in more defendants. It would also enable smaller firms to bring suit, the hope being that smaller firms would take on more marginal cases and get more action.
Second, it might actually create a feedback loop. If the fund gets large enough, it could lobby and investigate, providing more information more new suits, and identifying the worst actors, and encouraging useful regulation. Imagine if Consumers Union could return to its glory of the 80's and have a big lobbying fund?
Or, we could just have decent government level consumer protections (hahhahahahahahahah!)
The big problem I see with class actions...more than anything, is that the process is somewhat invisible and the settlements often handwave away acknowledgement of wrongdoing and thus possibility of reform.
A lot of legal settlements read like variants of 'The Narcissists Prayer'
What normally happens to unclaimed settlement money under the current way of doing things?
Depends on the settlement, but in most cases the defendant keeps it. Usually they only have to pay valid claims.
Yes, it seems better for the money to go to some good cause. I don't believe that it will make the settlements particularly more meaningful to the public (if they even notice them go by in the news), but the funding the right organizations might help.
Really? In my experience, it's followed the pattern of:
$X
Y%
of$X
Z%
of$X
Naturally, the specifics of the numbers
X
,Y
, andZ
are dependent on the particulars of the case.So, I don't know that all $X is distributed if the class does not claim it. I have seen $X defined as $A per member with a cap on $X, such that if there are not enough members to claim all $X, it stays with the defendant.
Caveat: I have not investigated this in depth, so my review sample could be invalid for any number of reasons.
In any event, the per member payout is usually so small as to be irrelevant to the member, especially when figuring the effort required to demonstrate their membership in the class.
I haven't done any research here, but I'd definitely believe that it can be case dependent and we've just had different experiences.