It's embedded in the site you linked. That's where I found it. There's no policy, as such. Only @Deimos can change links, so the "policy" boils down to his personal judgement. However, based on...
Nice, I didn't know about it.
It's embedded in the site you linked. That's where I found it.
Maybe we could replace topic link with the blog post? I'm not sure what the policy on link replacement is.
There's no policy, as such. Only @Deimos can change links, so the "policy" boils down to his personal judgement. However, based on his previous actions and his public statements, I believe he would be in favour of replacing this particular link.
Another option is for you to delete this topic and submit a new one based on the blog post. If you do this, note that the central word is "steganography", not "stenography". (I already fixed this for you.)
I completely missed it, I just played with it for a while and then just shared the link. Maybe I could read the text on the site as well. I just did it, hopefully fixed everything. Thank you for...
It's embedded in the site you linked. That's where I found it.
I completely missed it, I just played with it for a while and then just shared the link. Maybe I could read the text on the site as well.
Another option is for you to delete this topic
I just did it, hopefully fixed everything. Thank you for correction, English is not my mother language and I never used the word before :-)
This is a tool to encode/decode data in chess games. It first encodes the input data as a bignum, and then encodes the bignum in the move choices in the chess game. The "without blunders" mode uses p4wn to try to avoid playing bad moves. This mode is less likely to arouse suspicion among actual chess players, but results in longer games.
The developer's blog post is much more informative.
For instance:
Nice, I didn't know about it.
Maybe we could replace topic link with the blog post? I'm not sure what the policy on link replacement is.
It's embedded in the site you linked. That's where I found it.
There's no policy, as such. Only @Deimos can change links, so the "policy" boils down to his personal judgement. However, based on his previous actions and his public statements, I believe he would be in favour of replacing this particular link.
Another option is for you to delete this topic and submit a new one based on the blog post. If you do this, note that the central word is "steganography", not "stenography". (I already fixed this for you.)
I completely missed it, I just played with it for a while and then just shared the link. Maybe I could read the text on the site as well.
I just did it, hopefully fixed everything. Thank you for correction, English is not my mother language and I never used the word before :-)
Nor have I! I just noticed that your title looked different to the title on the website. :)
HN discussion
This is really cool, thanks for sharing.