In the study they say Google gathers data on the LineageOS and on the /e/OS they do not. The /e/OS is a fork of the LineageOS and it uses the MicroG implementation of the Google services. I wonder...
In the study they say Google gathers data on the LineageOS and on the /e/OS they do not. The /e/OS is a fork of the LineageOS and it uses the MicroG implementation of the Google services. I wonder why they have installed the OpenGapps on the LineageOS instead of the MicroG that /e/OS uses, and if that's the reason LineageOS gets worse results.
By default, the LineageOS does not come with OpenGapps or with MicroG.
Are the people who made the study trying to make the /e/OS look better than the LineageOS on purpose? Are they incompetent? Or, is there another reason for the results?
In the study they say Google gathers data on the LineageOS and on the /e/OS they do not. The /e/OS is a fork of the LineageOS and it uses the MicroG implementation of the Google services. I wonder why they have installed the OpenGapps on the LineageOS instead of the MicroG that /e/OS uses, and if that's the reason LineageOS gets worse results.
By default, the LineageOS does not come with OpenGapps or with MicroG.
Are the people who made the study trying to make the /e/OS look better than the LineageOS on purpose? Are they incompetent? Or, is there another reason for the results?