286437714's recent activity

  1. Men of Tildes: PLEASE consider before commenting on ~life.women and ~lgbt without careful consideration. We are losing members over this issue.

    This is not a request for new rules, as Deimos has made it clear that is not going to happen. This is not a callout post for any individual, including our esteemed admin, or any one user. This is...

    This is not a request for new rules, as Deimos has made it clear that is not going to happen. This is not a callout post for any individual, including our esteemed admin, or any one user.

    This is an honest, earnest plea. I like to joke on Tildes, so this is quite hard to write.

    I've been on Tildes for a few years now, under various usernames. This site has consistently lost great users because people come into ~life.women and ~lgbt to say versions of 'I haven't seen that', 'that's not my experience', or 'I don't think this is a big issue.'

    We lost another user today over this issue. People aren't aware of it, because by the time people are so disgusted they leave, it's usually just a PM notification to their closer contacts who tend to be in a similar headspace, not a dramatic announcement on the front page.

    Tildes is for discussion. Let me give two examples of ways I try not to bring negative discussion to things that the majority of users passionately care about:

      1. I do not care about AI. I do not believe the conversation about it is interesting. Sometimes, it makes me actively angry. But many of you do. Instead of commenting to say 'I think this is boring, and this never impacts my life', I filter the posts, or do not read them.
      1. I don't know what it's like to be a programmer. The plight of programmers is foreign to me. From the outside, looking in, I could make a bunch of assumptions about the hardships experienced by programmers, or system adminstrators, or software engineers are often saying they are experiencing on this site. Instead of saying 'have you tried finding another job?' or 'Well, I've never seen that', to call into question your experiences, I do not comment, because I know nothing about it.

    The experiences of women, who are a minority on this site, are things that the vast majority of users do not have first-hand insight into. The same goes with gay users, asexual users, intersex users, gender non-conforming users, and users who are queer in a way I may never have come across before.

    The pile-ons in these two groups are persistent, ongoing, and I have observed them for enough time to know it's generally not intentional, and it is relatively user-churn agnostic. This site attracts more cisgendered heterosexual men than it does women or queer people. That's how it is.

    I am not asking for a verification system where you have to prove your bona fides before commenting. I am not asking for these groups to be quarantined off, because that further marginalizes minority groups on the site.

    I am asking for users who are not women, or identify as queer, to think very carefully before posting comments that (regardless of the intention) are perceived time and again as invalidating the real experiences of people you do not know, and cannot experience yourself.

    I am very sad that a lot of the people I have made close connections to on Tildes have left due to the prevalence of this issue. We know now that the site is feature-complete. You either try and set the culture, or you end up with one.

    I would like us to set a culture that is more respective of the spaces intended for women and queer people to discuss issues pertaining to their lives. I am very upset that this continuously is a challenge, especially for members who post, comment, and lurk in those groups.

    If you constantly feel the need to 'challenge' or 'dispute' articles and posts made in those groups, please examine why. This cycle of members of these groups having to explain sexism and oppression to people who have not experienced it in the same way women and queer people do is exhausting, and puts the emotional labor on the minority groups on this site.

    The majority of the site is very welcoming to heterosexual men. Regardless of your intention, please do not 'just ask questions' or feel the need to say 'You know, I've never seen that!' or 'This reminds me of when my Project Manager called me out at a scrum unfairly.'

    We are losing valuable intellectual, cultural, and gender diversity over the persistence of the issues outlined above. If you don't care about this, that sucks, but it makes Tildes a much better place for me and many others who are sadly no longer here.

    *TL;DR: If you're inserting yourself into Tildes groups about women's lives and the discussion of LGBT issues without being a member of either group in your actual life, please think twice before posting quick reactions to content that may have made you defensive, or content that you (for whatever reason) feel the need to disprove.

    Assuming good faith, your unsolicited opinion about a topic you have not experienced personally is simply consistently not welcomed by the contributors, commenters, and lurkers who use those groups to discuss issues impacting them directly.

    If you find the content annoying or feel the need to debate its veracity constantly, simply unsubscribe. It is not hard. It is the base level of respect this community relies on to survive.

    Thank you, and I am sorry if this is coming across as aggressive, mean-spirited, or me taking on airs above the station of a normal user.

    I am just a normal user, asking others like me to be kind and thoughtful.

    7 votes
  2. Comment on Men in tech #YesAllMen in ~life.women

    286437714
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    You say in few words what I spend many words trying to say. Good wrods. Edit. I didn't notice that typo and it was unintentional. I am leaving that there as it's a great encapsulation of me...

    Perhaps people got trained up to spot butt slaps and rape kit gifts and fuck you you whore messages, and they become blind to any other kinds of harrassment. They don't see it. They get angry when people suggest they couldn't see a different kind of gorilla.

    You say in few words what I spend many words trying to say. Good wrods.

    Edit. I didn't notice that typo and it was unintentional. I am leaving that there as it's a great encapsulation of me talking/writing naturally, versus going to great effort to trying to get my thoughts together.

    Never forget, dear @Chocobean, I am far closer to 'good wrods' than I am to eloquent prose in reality. 😂

    3 votes
  3. Comment on Men in tech #YesAllMen in ~life.women

    286437714
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    Having worked there, I have seen gender discrimination in male dominated fields. Just because it looks different doesn't mean it doesn't happen. If anything, the bystander effect is stronger in...

    Having worked there, I have seen gender discrimination in male dominated fields. Just because it looks different doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

    If anything, the bystander effect is stronger in Sweden/Norway (don't know about Denmark, never been for work) because of societal pressures against putting one above one's station.

    I used one of @Chocobean's strategies I learned from a bystander intervention course frequently. My bias is towards direct conflict, but when I said to a woman I worked with 'Hey, I found that sexist', the response was usually 'Thank you, it was.'

    Then I would play stranger from a strange land and say 'Let's not be sexist at work please. In my culture it is considered unprofessional. I expected better.' An embarrassed Swedish officer, desperate to not lose Swedish cultural pride over equality (and being a nice person), would then concur and told individuals or groups to cut it out. Lost drinking buddies, gained access to a whole world of personal stories that are not captured in EU or OECD or World Bank data.

    I found in Sweden that the presence of a foreigner made Cockroach Sexism (hidden, pervasive) easier to call out. Especially if there wasn't a woman in the room and the men felt 'safe' amongst a room full of seemingly cishet men, no matter where they were from. They expected non-Swedes to be more okay with discrimination, leading me to think they were biting their tongues a lot.

    My presence there actually helped draw it out, because I would jokingly call them non-combat trade nerds (I was there to help an enabling taskforce) and that would encourage them to try and be more masculine. Then they'd either say what they thought would impress me, or what they really thought. This obviously extended to other workplace minorities.

    I will say that Swedish sexist discrimination is much less obvious and boorish than American examples I have experience professionally. But I had been through a lot of gender advisor training because Afghanistan and, frankly, working in American task forces. So what looked completely fair and equitable to a Swedish man was not what many Swedish women experienced when I spoke up and called it out.

    Shocking, I know. If only there was some way to shut up and listen to what they were saying by signalling that you do not like people being unkind, shutting your mouth, and listening when they are telling you their subjective experience.

    I was going to send this as a PM to you but hopefully it resonates with someone who reads this that stats in gender equity do not capture what women and GNC people experience on a daily basis, even in the best statistically performing countries in the world.

    13 votes
  4. Comment on Men in tech #YesAllMen in ~life.women

    286437714
    Link Parent
    Especially as one of the posts mentioned South Korea. Not as a comparison, but 'we'd be saying South Korean men!' It implies that the Anglosphere is some kind of extreme outlier in harassment and...

    Especially as one of the posts mentioned South Korea. Not as a comparison, but 'we'd be saying South Korean men!'

    It implies that the Anglosphere is some kind of extreme outlier in harassment and gendered violence. South Korea is one of the least gender equitable societies in the world, and throwing it out there as an example of how to be more precise just seems like Orientalism to me.

    My broader point which I think you're making is, if you're going to come into ~life.women saying 'actually, this isn't a problem in my experience', provide qualitative or quantitative data before hitting post. Or even reconsider whether chiming in to say 'this article/video/whatever isn't Logical and Reasonable' will help the conversation, or just turn it into men telling women their experiences are fake again, often through ignorance of how these comments are perceived.

    After being on Tildes long enough and seeing the user churn, ignorance isn't an excuse for me. This is one of the two groups where people from without casually post their thoughts on things instead of considering that They Are What The Thing Posted Is About.

    I'm tired of seeing twenty comments only for the poster to reluctantly say 'well, I didn't know that' after a bunch of other people have gone to the emotional labor of educating them.

    This happens over and over and over again.

    12 votes
  5. Comment on Does Tildes welcomes “self-promoting” links to personal blog posts? in ~tildes

    286437714
    Link Parent
    Agreed. I didn't see that, but I'm not sure what the solution would be. I couldn't find anything under the 'press release' tag, so I just filtered source.anthropic, source.openai. All the articles...

    Agreed. I didn't see that, but I'm not sure what the solution would be.

    I couldn't find anything under the 'press release' tag, so I just filtered source.anthropic, source.openai. All the articles were 'OUR LATEST DEVELOPMENT IS TOO DANGEROUS TO HANDLE!' etc, so that was advertising that was easy to get rid of. And as you say, I'm not the client, because I'm not a tech person who cares about market valuations of AI.

    (If someone comes along and says 'well they care about you!', I'll prybar your router.)

    I honestly don't know what the solution would be if someone wanted to avoid game/movie trailers beyond unsubbing from ~games or ~movies.

    Do tags have to be exact? The GTA one currently has trailers.launch, but would adding 'trailers' catch it up?

    2 votes
  6. Comment on Does Tildes welcomes “self-promoting” links to personal blog posts? in ~tildes

    286437714
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    Thank you, I missed that entirely. I'll add it to my filters now. Du er den dyrebare hyldebĂŚr i den tornede busk. EDIT I wasn't able to find anything under the press releases tag, but adding the...

    Thank you, I missed that entirely. I'll add it to my filters now.

    Du er den dyrebare hyldebĂŚr i den tornede busk.

    EDIT I wasn't able to find anything under the press releases tag, but adding the following cleared up all the submissions about the latest model being amazing/this latest model is dangerous/this latest product has AI in the past few months:

    source.anthropic
    source.openai
    source.amazon
    source.google
    revenue
    ipo

    It also got rid of an Amazon press release/media kit/product launch page for a new tablet, and the same for a new Google laptop.

    Interestingly, the foldy-Apple-phone stuff was submitted through tech journalism and consumer electronics websites. Indicating (to me, anyway) there was enough interest for other people to write about them. I do think that's very different than the AI 'data science reports' straight from the company saying how great/dangerous it is, or 'Here's our revenue!' posts.

    2 votes
  7. Comment on Does Tildes welcomes “self-promoting” links to personal blog posts? in ~tildes

    286437714
    Link Parent
    I can't stand this. Self promotion is one thing, reposting a PR or marketing release from AI companies and just highlighting parts of it in the submission comment is in the same category as...

    In fairness I should add that I also dislike it when people post links to content that is mostly or entirely advertising - for example blogs or tweets about AI, written by some big AI company.

    I can't stand this. Self promotion is one thing, reposting a PR or marketing release from AI companies and just highlighting parts of it in the submission comment is in the same category as influencer marketing to me.

    Then I try to read the other comments to see if this is actually something more than a marketing release, and it's people just arguing back and forth about whether AI stock releases are going to be good enough.

    If we could have a press.release or marketing tag I'd filter it immediately. Or a ~AI.bets group, so they can please themselves without cluttering up the tech feed.

    I'm with you @lia - if someone predominantly posts their own work i don't think anyone can be objective about 'I think this is high effort and worth sharing with the community.' But just posting a link to whatever new claims Anthropic or OpenAI or Meta have made, straight to the media release, is surely breaking some kind of 'no advertising rule'.

    If that person wants to write a self post critically analyzing the latest AI marketing scheme, cool. That could be interesting. But direct links to mega corporations' own hype, or even just 'news' articles repeating the press release without critical analysis, is the antithesis of why this site is so good.

    8 votes
  8. Comment on I survived the certificate expiration of October 19th 2026 and all I got was to make a silly shitpost in ~tildes

    286437714
    Link Parent
    Yeah I'm not a fool. I know the websites aren't actually inside my computer. They're in the router, and it needs to be told what will happen if it takes hostages.

    Yeah I'm not a fool. I know the websites aren't actually inside my computer.

    They're in the router, and it needs to be told what will happen if it takes hostages.

    5 votes
  9. Comment on I survived the certificate expiration of October 19th 2026 and all I got was to make a silly shitpost in ~tildes

    286437714
    Link Parent
    The contingency planner in me wants to establish a rendezvous point in case Tildes disappears without warning. The idiot-who-struggles-with-Excel-and-solves-problems-with-force in me does not know...

    The contingency planner in me wants to establish a rendezvous point in case Tildes disappears without warning.

    The idiot-who-struggles-with-Excel-and-solves-problems-with-force in me does not know how, and will probably try threatening the router with a prybar.

    9 votes
  10. Comment on I survived the certificate expiration of October 19th 2026 and all I got was to make a silly shitpost in ~tildes

    286437714
    Link
    For non computer people, what is a TLS certificate and how do I avoid it hurting me again in future?

    For non computer people, what is a TLS certificate and how do I avoid it hurting me again in future?

    9 votes
  11. Comment on Prime Minister Mark Carney confirms four dead and next of kin notified after fire at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright in Alberta in ~news

    286437714
    Link Parent
    They're mostly made out of reconfigurable/replaceable pre-frabricated walls on a concrete slab. Slab absorbs blast damage, walls can be relplaced if they get banged up too bad from ballistics or...

    They're mostly made out of reconfigurable/replaceable pre-frabricated walls on a concrete slab. Slab absorbs blast damage, walls can be relplaced if they get banged up too bad from ballistics or concussion damage.

    We had one that was concrete and steel that was to train on specific low-collateral damage ammunition natures, and also to demonstrate what a catastrophic ricochet did if using standard NATO 5.56 indoors.

    The doors can range from extremely strong (to practice breaching) to just a piece of composite wood if it needs to be replaced every ten minutes, if sections are rotating through from an infantry company to get certified on urban building clearance. Given it's Company-sized casualties and four fatalities, my guess is that infantry sections were rotating through for clearance certification and the rest of the exposed Company were waiting outside. It's like a fairground ride line, or, if there's a long wait, people nap or try to get rest on their packs.

    All that is really irrelevant I think. Even though my logical brain knows that the best way to survive a fire like this is to drench yourself and get very low under wet clothing/packs/blankets/buddies, that all requires prep time. With a fire moving that fast, I doubt my logical brain would have time to a) kick in and b) do anything other than run on instinct.

    Poor people. I have worked with some truly wonderful CAF personnel. When I was younger, I put it down to being 'like Americans, but polite'. But the older I got the more I saw there was a very large difference between Canadian national pride and the way that filters through to the ethics and virtues instilled in the members of the Armed Forces. That has obviously become much more pronounced to the non-Canadians amongst us over the last two years.

    3 votes
  12. Comment on Prime Minister Mark Carney confirms four dead and next of kin notified after fire at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright in Alberta in ~news

    286437714
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    That tracks. It could have been a range safety hut, a quartermaster store, field maintenance area for vehicles, or even just a non-functional terrain feature that was built for the training range...

    That tracks. It could have been a range safety hut, a quartermaster store, field maintenance area for vehicles, or even just a non-functional terrain feature that was built for the training range (like a mobile command post or a non-scenario medic station).

    That explains the disparity between deaths and casualties. Poor people. I've seen fires move that fast from the air and it's terrifying seeing it head towards trucks or engineering sections, even if you know they can theoretically survive.

    The ground footage I've seen from helmet mounted cameras, especially from Canadian firefighters, is terrifying.

    They only have seconds to get into specialty trucks with water canons where reactive armor would be on a military vehicle, and they have to roll down fire resistant blankets on all doors and windows in case the pressure wave or temperature blows the glass out.

    1 vote
  13. Comment on Prime Minister Mark Carney confirms four dead and next of kin notified after fire at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright in Alberta in ~news

    286437714
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    Training and exercise deaths are a huge issue. There's a whole secondary field of study on the trauma incurred by a soldier, sailor, or aircrew member who sees someone die, or comes close to death...
    • Exemplary

    Training and exercise deaths are a huge issue.

    There's a whole secondary field of study on the trauma incurred by a soldier, sailor, or aircrew member who sees someone die, or comes close to death themselves, but don't feel like they've earned the ability to seek help because it wasn't 'real'. It wasn't enemy action, it was an accident, or negligence, or bad leadership. I would be very unsurprised if Canadian Army meteorologists end up with psychological injuries after this incident.

    But this was a huge, pre-deployment combat exercise. My feeling is that it won't get thrown in the bucket of 'oh, died in a workplace safety accident' bucket. It'll be given the resources, ceremony, and respect that a mass combat casualty incident would be given, if I know my Canadians. And I think that's good for the people involved, and good for the Canadian Armed Forces.

    But, my experience is that the less warlike the incident, the worse it gets for the people involved. It can be really useful to get people in military accidents to attend non-military treatment, as the biggest per-capita causes of PTSD in developed countries are things like road traffic accidents and difficult childbirth.

    In military circles, certainly no one would outright express 'that wasn't on operations, so it's not real', but it is often the undercurrent of feeling if someone's leg isn't blown off or there's not visible damage. And because non-military treatment with civilians is not covered by the CAF care scheme (or really any military care scheme, military contractors or no care), it's a big issue that needs to be dealt with.

    Dying or being badly injured on an exercise like this one doesn't necessarily hurt worse than dying on deployment, because it's understood that the participant was doing their best to get ready to be deployed, with full commitment to the shared virtue ethic. Far more people die in the raise, train, and sustain cycle of developed militaries than on operations, even Americans. That might have changed since Iran, I don't know. But getting training for combat, getting ready for deployment, and maintaining readiness means doing inherently dangerous things. The people I know would not say a traumatic incident in a large-scale exercise was a shit way to go. Shit, as in, 'didn't die doing what they signed up for or were training for'.

    I was in a bunker one day in my home country's operational headquarters and an ambulance arrived. We were all just working away and they rolled a bodybag past. It was the friendly ground planning Captain who was training for his special forces selection course, and had a heart attack on the treadmill. Shit way to go. And twenty or thirty people saw him die and just had to get back to work. In theory, they could have requested psychological leave, but the culture implicitly discourages it.

    And that's what I'd say what is really difficult, in my anecdotal experience. For the people who can't continue service in any role after training causes severe injury, or a death that they narrowly avoided. It's then compounded if it's just a regular part of a workday for a service member, but doesn't reach the level of national tragedy this one does, so it's incomprehensible to the civilian world.

    Reading into statements, these CAF members were doing live-fire section attacks and grenade drills on a large training range, and given they were due for deployment, this was likely their final certification exercise before deployment to Estonia. I think a civilian could probably understand that. Preparing to be deployed to Europe to be ready for high-intensity warlike operations is inherently dangerous, and using real munitions can start a fire.

    I'm not for a second saying the survivors of this tragedy have it good, but preparing for a potential war against Russia to defend democracy in Europe is what most soldiers would consider an honorable pursuit. Everyone in Canada is going to know about the CFB Wainwright fire, so they won't have to explain it.

    But then there's the other side of training and exercise injuries. I have a friend who was strangled on a parachute training rig I would have to draw with paper and pen to explain how it works, and how - even though it looks like a fairground ride - it's actually the last thing you do before you jump out of an aircraft and do your first static jump, and requires a month of preparation. He doesn't talk about his injury, because to him, it is embarrassing to say 'I got PTSD because someone rigged a harness incorrectly and I nearly suffocated.'

    I know someone else who got stuck in a helicopter underwater escape cage through no fault of their own because of an equipment fault from the supplier. They couldn't get back in the water, lost flight status, don't want to talk about it. Their biggest fear is someone making a joke that they're afraid of swimming pools.

    And then others that happen in workplaces that don't involve jumping out of an aircraft or learning how to get out of a new model helicopter as a pilot. Strip away the uniforms and the weapons and what you see in the commercials, any military is mostly like any other job.

    People in combat trades get lost learning navigation, they worry they'll die of thirst if there's a missed supply drop, they fear they nearly died when a shell went off unexpectedly at their gun station, there was a near-miss with an aircraft and they nearly got hit on a runway.

    But it's a workplace, and 90% of the force is in barracks or an office. People trip, they fall, they get concussed, they get electrocuted, they get bullied, and obviously sexual assault happens as much (or slightly less, depending) in a military workplace as it does in any other workplace.

    The brainstem doesn't really care near-death trauma, seeing someone die trauma, or sexual trauma takes place in a warlike background or not. It's often the 'mundane', 'non-military' injuries that cause more psychological stress for service people.

    In addition to this, there's the embarrassment factor. I had a tank commander boss who had seen the aftermath of civilian-on-civilian atrocities in a particularly well-known conflict. So, when a mortar round killed someone on his statistically very safe base in Iraq, he didn't feel like he'd 'earned' the right to speak to a psychologist or a doctor when he got home. He ended up with extremely bad PTSD.

    When something visibly awful happens, especially if it gets politicians involved, armies of psychologists and doctors and care support workers are mobilized to help. But when it's just part of the day job and it means having to come forward yourself, especially when you have a culturally accepted benchmark of what 'trauma' is? Much more difficult, much fewer resources.

    All of that to say, in this particular example, probably none of the CAF soldiers involved dreamed of dying on Canadian territory, but knew - logically - it was more likely than dying overseas. As this exercise was a capstone exercise for a combined combat trade taskforce, no one's going to be looking at the victims and thinking they're faking their distress and not worthy of care from the state. No service person would say 'doesn't count' because they hadn't been deployed yet.

    But random death or injury in normally very low-risk training does hurt worse. Especially the ones that are extremely hard to explain to someone who hasn't lived that life, even if they wore a different uniform or did a different job.

    Source: Carl A Castro's papers and writing are a good place to start, but there are many other specialized academics who look into death and trauma in the context of non-combat operations or exercises. I remember the findings being that forced medical separations (being fired cause you're hurt) have an insanely higher suicide statistic than combat trauma or warlike exercise trauma, but I don't have time to find an exact source, and this was on a course years ago.

    9 votes
  14. Comment on Prime Minister Mark Carney confirms four dead and next of kin notified after fire at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright in Alberta in ~news

    286437714
    (edited )
    Link Parent
    One of the general officers involved says they were doing section attacks. This is usually done by infantry in open-field training ranges, or in specially built 'kill houses'. The latter are more...

    One of the general officers involved says they were doing section attacks. This is usually done by infantry in open-field training ranges, or in specially built 'kill houses'.

    The latter are more for urban operations and given the unit was being certified for Estonia, it's likely they were out in a field that caught fire (based on what information is available now, I obviously could be wrong).

    There's a chance that CFB Wainwright has an urban training complex, but for that many to be injured, I think it's more likely it was a flashfire caused by spent casings, ricochet heat, or different grenade natures. To have a fire take out a whole company-sized casualty list implies to me that it was outdoors, but, again, could be wrong.

    Edit: Looks like the early reports of gas infrastructure explosions were wrong. Fast-moving grass fire in dry vegetation with high winds. The fire moved 1km in 30-60 seconds, which is consistent with wildfire speeds in a catastrophic incident. It makes sense the initial reports would describe a gas-explosion like fireball, because that's what gusting wind, dry-vegetation fires look like, and most people haven't seen it. It's a giant fireball that looks like it must be powered by some accelerant.

    Although it's not currently wildfire season in Canada, as has been frequently documented, disasters like this no longer follow predictable patterns due to climate change.

    4 votes
  15. Comment on Since season 4 of The Diplomat is out today, here is one of the best scenes from the show (season 2 episode 6 spoilers!) in ~tv

    286437714
    Link Parent
    It is so weird to see Keri Russell be an actual American after The Americans. I really hope the series finale to The Diplomat is her going to a penthouse apartment in London, taking off her wig as...

    It is so weird to see Keri Russell be an actual American after The Americans.

    I really hope the series finale to The Diplomat is her going to a penthouse apartment in London, taking off her wig as Philip hands her a coffee, and saying 'That was a long one.'

    4 votes