atmk's recent activity
-
Comment on How to succeed in a cramming-based academic system? in ~science
-
How to succeed in a cramming-based academic system?
I'm an intuitive learner. I learn by constantly asking questions, the answers to which i can then effortlessly remember. By messing around and seeing what happens, and then asking why. Lecturers...
I'm an intuitive learner. I learn by constantly asking questions, the answers to which i can then effortlessly remember. By messing around and seeing what happens, and then asking why. Lecturers have been enthusiastic about my approach but said I'm going to struggle because the school system in my country wasn't designed for people who learn like this. I want to kill myself.
The way I see myself learning stuff:
- Here's a fresh store-bought kombucha scoby
- Here's a scoby from the same store that I've been growing for 6 weeks
- If I sequenced the DNA from equivalent cells in each of these scobys, would I find any differences? Why?
Same with my latest interest: Law. I've watched a few (mock) court cases and researched whatever questions I came up with, to get an understanding of how courts worked, and had a look at the cited laws.In physics tests I end up running out of time because whenever I forget an equation I need, I try to intuit/derive it, which I would manage given enough time.
The way we are actually expected to learn stuff:
- Listening to a lecturer talk for 12×2 hours, and/or reading the referenced literature. Anything mentioned could be on the test.
I have been trying to do it the mainstream way anyway, but I am getting such bad grades that I've had to re-take a year. Even if I found strategies to help me focus I'd still clearly have a competitive disadvantage to people to whom this approach comes naturally. This feels unfair since I know there is a way that I could learn about my field as effortlessly as other people do listening to these lectures.
How does someone like me succeed in academia instead of just scraping through?
I understand that my prefered methpd which I outlined is what you do at PhD level. I'm afraid that by force-feeding my brain all this information that it currently sees as irrelevant, I will kill my curiousity, which I don't want to do because it's the thing that's allowed me to get this far with practically no effort (I went through the archetypal Smart Kid thing in middle school).
For context, I'm in 1st year bachelor's biochemistry (repeating the year). Although I think that at least in my country, all university courses have the format I described.
Since I am also struggling with ADHD I honestly feel like giving up on Uni and going for some sort of apprentiship-style thing. I would like to have a degree though because it's sort of a requirement nowadays and I am genuinely interested in my subject area. Alternatively, what kind of professions seek my method of inquisitively deep-diving into stuff, as I described?
19 votes -
Comment on Children predict the year 2000 (1966, video) in ~life
atmk Yes, considering one of them was mentioning quite metaphorical things like going to the 'funeral of a computer' (which I'm not really sure how to picture), I would expect many of their visions...Yes, considering one of them was mentioning quite metaphorical things like going to the 'funeral of a computer' (which I'm not really sure how to picture), I would expect many of their visions come from sci-fi
-
Comment on California is preparing to defend itself — and the nation — against Donald Trump 2.0 in ~enviro
atmk This is great to hear. What do you think the Democrats (or civil society?) are doing correctly that is allowing actual pro-welfare state legislation to be passed over there? (Instead of the...This is great to hear. What do you think the Democrats (or civil society?) are doing correctly that is allowing actual pro-welfare state legislation to be passed over there? (Instead of the Democrats just being less right wing than the Republicans as is the case in the rest of the US, at least from an outsider's perspective)
-
Comment on <deleted topic> in ~life.men
atmk Interesting, there seems to be a wave of people speaking out about the horrors of boarding schools at the moment. A couple of months ago I watched an interview with Richard Beard, who wrote a...Interesting, there seems to be a wave of people speaking out about the horrors of boarding schools at the moment. A couple of months ago I watched an interview with Richard Beard, who wrote a similar book detailing his experiences, 'Sad Little Men'.
-
Comment on How universal basic income became the pessimist’s utopia in ~finance
atmk (edited )LinkOne thing I don't understand with proposals for UBI is where the money would come from. From a purely mathematical standpoint. The only way I can see it working is if it was introduced gradually...One thing I don't understand with proposals for UBI is where the money would come from. From a purely mathematical standpoint.
The only way I can see it working is if it was introduced gradually as jobs were automated. Otherwise I see it leading to a shortage of work. Here's my thinking:Let's assume that everyone is given an amount of money that fully satisfies them, meaning they leave their job. Suddenly all jobs in the economy become vacant (as people are happy with their guaranteed income), meaning that the economy grinds to a halt. Eventually people will want to use their ideally-sized incomes to buy things like food, but there won't be anyone around to sell the food to them, as they too will be smugly sitting at home with an income they are happy with. This would cause the price of everything to skyrocket, up to a price for which others would once again be willing to provide the service, which would however render people's ideally-sized incomes valueless.
This is my proposed solution:
The economy carries on as usual. Automation will eventually be developed. As a job – let's say a bricklayer's – gets automated, the employer keeps paying the bricklayer their salary, because the work they are paying for will still be getting done. Except that now the work will be done by a robot on behalf of the bricklayer. The bricklayer will now be free to do whatever they please with their time, however they'll still retain a legal bond to their ex-job, as they'll be contracting the robot to do their work for them. The robot would be bought and owned by the bricklayer – not the employer who would be banned from buying robots. The ex-worker pays for its upkeep and insurance out of their (ie. the robot's) salary, and it is in their interest to invest into improvements so that they can keep as much of the salary as possible.This approach would prevent ludditeism. I would be interested to explore it further. What are your thoughts?
-
Comment on What programming/technical projects have you been working on? in ~comp
atmk That sounds interesting. Have you gotten any ergonomic use out of it? I once thought about making a voice controlled extension for Firefox that would aid skimming though webpages. You would say...That sounds interesting. Have you gotten any ergonomic use out of it?
I once thought about making a voice controlled extension for Firefox that would aid skimming though webpages. You would say the question/info you were looking for and it would use a BERT-like ml model to highlight the most relevant part of the text
Thank you for this reply. Yes, I have also found LLMs to be very useful as they allow me to follow a conversation based learning style for which I would have previously needed a tutor. I'll comment again if I think of any more questions